Abstract
Many European countries have promoted the development of household services in order to foster employment, particularly among the least skilled. France has been a pioneer in this field (Chapter 2) and is also the country where public support of household services has been the most consequential. Besides job creation, France’s policy has also explicitly aimed at responding to social needs, by subsidising the consumption of child- and eldercare home services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adema, W., P. Fron and M. Ladaique (2011), ‘Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive? Indicators on Social Spending, 1980–2012, and a Manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, n. 124, OECD Publishing.
Bailly, F., F.-X. Devetter and F. Horn (2013), ‘Can working and employment conditions in the personal services sector be improved?’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37 (2), pp. 299–321.
Carbonnier, C., (2009), ‘Réduction et crédit d’impôt pour l’emploi d’un salarié à domicile, conséquences incitatives et redistributives’, Economie et statistique n. 427–428, pp. 67–100.
Carbonnier, C., B. Palier and M. Zemmour (2014), ‘Tax cuts or social investment? Evaluating the opportunity cost of the French employment strategy’, LIEPP Working Paper n. 31.
Dares (2014), ‘Les dépenses en faveur de l’emploi et du marché du travail en 2011’, Dares analyse n. 018. Available at http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/ pdf/2014–018–2.pdf (Accessed: 26 April 2015 )
Despujol, B., B. Proisy and G. Thibault (2012), Services à la personne: bilan économique et enjeux de croissance, Oliver Wyman.
DGTrésor (2013), Evaluation des voies et moyens, tome II, annexe au projet de loi de finance pour 2014, Paris, La documentation française.
Flipo, A. (1998), ‘Aspects redistributifs des mesures incitatives au développement des emplois familiaux en France’, in Méhaut, P. and P. Fossé (eds.) Les politiques sociales catégorielles–fondements, portée et limites, Tome 2. Paris, L’Harmattan, pp. 343–360.
Flipo, A., D. Fougère and L. Olier (2007), ‘Is the household demand for in-home services sensitive to tax reductions? The French case’, Journal of Public Economics, 91 (1–2), pp. 365–385.
Frölich, M. (2004), ‘Finite-sample properties of propensity-score matching and weighting estimators’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (1), pp. 77–90.
Garbinti, B., (2011), ‘La réduction d’impôt pour l’emploi à domicile, 1992–2011, Bilan d’une politique publique’, Masters thesis, Paris School of Economics.
Givord, P., (2010), ‘Méthodes économétriques pour l’évaluation des politiques publiques’, Document de travail de la DESE, INSEE.
Howard, C., (1997), The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Korpi, W. and J. Palme (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63 (5), pp. 661–687.
Marbot, C., (2008), ‘En France, qui recourt aux services à domicile?’, INSEE références, France portrait social, pp. 143–162.
Marbot, C., (2013), Les services à la personne en France: étude descriptive et trois évaluations de politique publique, PhD thesis, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
Marbot, C., and D. Roy (2011), ‘Evaluation de la transformation de la réduction d’impôt en crédit d’impôt pour l’emploi de salariés à domicile en 2007’, Document de travail de l’Insee G2011 /22.
Marx, I., L. Salanauskaite and G. Verbist (2013), ‘The paradox of redistribution revisited: And that it may rest in peace?’ GINI Discussion Papers 82, Amsterdam Institute for Advance Labor Studies.
Observatoire National de la petite enfance (2014), ‘L’accueil du jeune enfant en 2012, données statistiques’, Caisse Nationale des Allocations Familiales, Paris, France.
Piketty, T., (1998), ‘L’emploi dans les services en France et aux Etats-Unis: une analyse structurelle sur longue période’, Economie et statistique, 318, pp. 73–99.
Rosenzweig, M. R. and K. I. Wolpin (2000), ‘Natural “Natural Experiments” in Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 38 (4), pp. 827–874.
Sécurité Sociale (2013), Programmes de qualité et d’efficience, Famille, Projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale 2014, Annexe 1, Paris, La documentation française.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Clément Carbonnier
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carbonnier, C. (2015). Job Creation, Public Cost and the Distributive Profile of Tax Allowances for Household Services in France. In: Carbonnier, C., Morel, N. (eds) The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe. Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137473721_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137473721_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57728-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47372-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)