Abstract
The American university system, like most American institutions, rests on a long history of exclusionary and delegitimizing practices, ranging from not admitting or hiring people of color to disregarding their experiences and discrediting their scholarship (Hurtado, 1992; Hurtado, Millem, Clayton-Pedersen, & Alen, 1998; Markus, 2008). These practices have influenced, and in many ways continue to shape, ideas about who belongs in the academy and about what counts as the “right” or “good” way to participate in it (Hurtado et al., 1998; Oyserman & Markus, 1998; Plaut & Markus, 2005). The extent to which universities acknowledge this history and its impact on contemporary life in the academy varies substantially. Some universities cultivate an atmosphere of trust and transparency by explicitly engaging this history and encouraging members of the campus and surrounding community to dialogue and to hold each other accountable for addressing issues of equity and social justice. Other universities side-step difficult dialogues by keeping in check serious questions of accountability and by engaging in emblematic celebrations of “diversity.” With rare exceptions, universities frequently invoke narratives of progress in lieu of providing measurable outcomes (Moreno, Smith, Clayton-Pedersen, Parker, & Teraguchi, 2006).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agathangelou, A. M., & Ling, L. H. M. (2002). An unten(ur)able position: The politics of teaching for women of color in the U.S. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4, 368–398.
American Council on Education. (2007). American College president: Executive summary. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://www.acenet.edu/Content/navigationmenu/ProgramsServices/CPa/Executive_Summary.htm.
American Federation of Teachers. (2010). Promoting racial and ethnic diversity in the faculty: What higher education unions can do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
Antonio, A. L. (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 582–602.
Anzaldúa, G. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39, 363–391.
Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. New York: Pearson.
Brown-Glaude, W., Harley, S., Hawkesworth, M., & Litt, J. (Eds.). (2008). Doing diversity in higher education: Faculty leaders share challenges and strategies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cokley, K. O. (2002). Ethnicity, gender and academic self-concept: A preliminary examination of academic disidentification and implications for psychologists. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 378–388.
Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 218–228.
Curtis, J. W. (2011). Persistent inequality: Gender and academic employment. Prepared for “New Voices in Pay Equity”: An Event for Equal Pay Day, April 11, 2011.
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 1–52.
Fox, M. J. T. (2008). American Indian women in academia: The joys and challenges. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 1, 202–221.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Gordon, M. (2004). Diversifications of the faculty. In F. W. Hale (Ed.), What makes racial diversity work in higher education (pp. 183–198). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Gurin, P., Nagda, B. R. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17–34.
Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women’s studies. Old West-bury, NY: Feminist.
Hurtado, S. (1992). The campus racial climate: Contexts of conflict. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 539–569.
Hurtado, S., Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pedersen, A. R., & Alen, W. R (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 279–302.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Major, B., Spencer, S., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34–50.
Major, B., Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). Attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15(1–2), 113–141.
Mohanty, S. P. (2010). The future of diversity: Academic leaders reflect on American higher education. New York: Palgrave.
Moody, J. (2004). Faculty diversity: Problems and solutions. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.). (1983). This bridge called my back. Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table.
Moreno, J. F., Smith, D. G., Clayton-Pedersen, A. R, Parker, S., & Teraguchi, D. H. (2006). The revolving door for underrepresented minority faculty in higher education. San Francisco: James Irvine Foundation.
Moya, P. M., & Markus, H. R. (2010). Doing race: An introduction. In H. R. Markus & P. M. Moya (Eds.), Doing race: 21 essays for the 21st century (pp. 1–101). New York: Norton.
Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55–71.
Nussbaum, D., & Steele, C. M. (2007). Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 127–134.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. (1998). Self as social representation. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 107–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plaut, V. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). The “inside” story: A cultural-historical analysis of how to be smart and motivated, American style. In A. Elliott & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 457–488). New York: Guilford.
Reagon, B. J. (2000). Coalition politics: Turning the century. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home girls: A black feminist anthology. New York: Rutgers University Press.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
Smith, J. L., Sansone, C., & White, P. H. (2007). The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 99–114.
Stanley, C. A. (2006). Coloring the academic landscape: Faculty of color breaking the silence in predominantly white colleges and universities. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 701–736.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 34 (pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic.
Thompson, M., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2002). When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 183–203.
Thornton Dill, B. (2009). Intersections, identities, and inequalities in higher education. In B. T. Dill & R. E. Zambrana (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The Condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014–083). Characteristics of Post-secondary Faculty.
Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Solving social problems like a psychologist. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 101–102.
Yoder, J. D., Schleicher, T. L., & McDonald, T. W. (1998). Empowering token women leaders: The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 209–222.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Gladwell, M. (2011, February). The order of things. The New Yorker, pp. 14–21.
Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Zúñiga, X. (2012). Engaging race and gender: Intergroup dialogues in higher education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Markus, H. R., & Moya, P. M. L. (2012). Doing race: 21 essays for the 21st century. New York: Norton.
Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Phillips, K. W., Kim-Jun, S. Y., & Shim, S. (2010). The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. In R. van Dick & K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 253–272). New York: Routledge.
Sommers, S. R. (2008). Beyond information exchange: New perspectives on the benefits of racial diversity for group performance. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & K. W. Phillips (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams, vol. 11 (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Sturm, S. P. (2006). The architecture of inclusion: Interdisciplinary insights on pursuing institutional citizenship. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 29, 247–334.
Sturm, S. P., Eatman, T., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and community engagement in higher education. Catalyst Paper retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://fullparticipation.net.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Stephanie A. Fryberg and Ernesto Javier Martínez
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fryberg, S.A., Martínez, E.J. (2014). Constructed Strugglers. In: Fryberg, S.A., Martínez, E.J. (eds) The Truly Diverse Faculty. The Future of Minority Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456069_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456069_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68739-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45606-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)