Abstract
Our personal experiences as emerging scholars1 shape the contours of this chapter. What began as a conversation many years ago over a cup of coffee has become a deeper reflection, channeling the various opinions and feelings of our graduate cohort,2 and presented here as a first iteration that attempts to make sense of these shared experiences. The validity afforded to drawing from our ‘personal experience’ has itself long informed feminist modes of meaning-making: we have learned to value the personal as political, to find our voice, to enunciate, and also to acknowledge the limitations of our point of view. Because an important part of our training as feminist scholars has been to locate relations of power, this reflection has meant locating ourselves within a complex network of agents, to willfully complicate, rather than reduce the complexities of, the issues with which we are confronted. The feminist struggle is ongoing, and at once internal, structural, and institutional.
Ideally, feminist labour/mentorship/activism are all aspects of the same thing, that is, living one’s politics. Fostering real collectivity and questioning the hierarchies entrenched in academia. Respecting people as people, while stirring the pot.
— Anonymous
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, S. (1994) Gendered Education (Buckingham: Open University Press).
Ahmed, S. (1998) Differences that Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge University Press).
Ahmed, S. (2010) ‘Feminist Killjoys (and Other Willful Subjects)’, The Scholar & Feminist Online, 8(3), http://sfonline.barnard.edu/polyphonic/ahmed_01.htm (accessed 3 April 2013).
Allen, A. (2003) Why Privacy Isn’t Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal Accountability (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
Beauvoir, S. de (1948) The Ethics of Ambiguity, trans. Bernard Frechtman (Secaucus, NJ: Citadel).
Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia University Press).
Callaway, H. (1992) ‘Ethnography and Experience: Gender Implications in Fieldwork and Texts,’ in E. Oakely and H. Callaway (eds) Anthropology and Autobiography (London and New York: Routledge), 29–48.
Chapman, O. and Sawchuk, K. (2012) ‘Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and “Family Resemblances”,’ Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 5–26.
Clamen, J., Gillies, K. and Salah, T. (2013) ‘Working for Change: Sex Workers in the Union Struggle,’ in E. Van der Meulen, E. Durisin and V. Love (eds) Selling Sex: Experience, Advocacy and Research on Sex Work in Canada (Vancouver: UBC Press), 113–29.
Clifford, J. (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.E. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Cook, I. et al. (2005) ‘Positionality/Situated Knowledge,’ in D. Sibley, P. Jackson, D. Atkinson, and N. Washbourne (eds) Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Ideas (London and New York: I.B. Tauris), 16–26.
Engelstad, E. and Gerrard, S. (eds) (2005) ‘Challenging Situatedness,’ in E. Engelstad and S. Gerrard (eds) Challenging Situatedness: Gender, Culture and the Production of Knowledge (University of Chicago Press), 1–26.
England, K.V.L. (1994) ‘Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research,’ The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–9.
Flanders, J. and Muñoz, T. (2012) ‘An Introduction to Humanities Data Curation,’ DH Curation Guides, http://guide.dhcuration.org/intro/ (accessed 3 April 2013).
Fullick, M. (2011) “‘My grief lies all within” — PhD Students, Depression and Attrition,’ University Affairs, 14 December, www.universityaffairs.ca/speculative-diction/my-grief-lies-all-within-phd-students-depression-attrition/ (accessed 26 April 2014).
Gardner, P. (2012) ‘Extended Session: Feminist Scholarship Division’, www.icahdq.org/conf/2012/print_program.pdf (accessed 3 April 2013).
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books).
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books).
Godard, B. (1989) ‘Theorizing Feminist Discourse/Translation,’ Tessera, 6, 42–53.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge).
Hart, J. (2008) ‘Mobilization Among Women Academics: The Interplay between Feminism and Professionalization,’ NWSA Journal, 20(1), 184–208.
Hartsock, N. (1998) The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays (Colorado: Westview Press).
Hey, V. (2004) ‘Perverse Pleasures: Identity Work and the Paradoxes of Greedy Institutions,’ Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 33–43.
Juhasz, A. and Lerner, J. (eds) (2006) F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Lorde, A. (2007) ‘The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House’, in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press), 110–14.
McPherson, T. (2010) ‘Animating the Archive: Old Codes and New Media,’ 9 April, www4.uwm.edu/c21/pdfs/recaps/10spring/mcpherson_recap.pdf (accessed 3 April 2013).
Mill, J.S. (1974) On Liberty, ed. G. Himmelfarb (London: Penguin Books).
Nagar, R. and Geiger, S. (2007) ‘Reflexivity and Positionality in Feminist Fieldwork Revisted,’ in A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, J. Peck and T. Barnes (eds) Politics and Practice in Economic Geography (London: Sage), 267–78.
Namaste, V., Vukov, T., Saghie, N., Jean-Gilles, J., Lafrenière, M., Leclerc, N., Leroux, M., Monette, A. and Williamson, R. (2007) ‘HIV and STD Prevention Needs of Bisexual Women: Results from Projet Polyvalence,’ Canadian Journal of Communication, 32(3), 357–82.
Patai, D. (1994) ‘When Method Becomes Power,’ in A. Gitlin (ed.) Power and Method (New York: Routledge), 61–76.
Petty, S. and Crow, B. (2008) ‘Introduction to Digital Feminisms,’ Atlantis, 32(2), 2–5.
Rose, G. (1997) ‘Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics,’ Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–20.
Sandoval, C. (1995) ‘New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the Oppressed,’ in C.H. Gray (ed.) The Cyborg Handbook (New York: Routledge), 407–22.
Sarikakis, K. and Shade, L. (eds) (2008) Feminist Interventions in International Communication: Minding the Gap (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
Scalar (2013) (Website), www.scalar.ca.
Shade, L. and Crow, B. (2004) ‘Canadian Feminist Perspectives on Digital Technology,’ Topia, 11, 161–76.
Solnit, R. (2012) ‘Best of TomDispatch: Rebecca Solnit, The Archipelago of Arrogance,’ Tom Dispatch, 19 August, www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175584/ (accessed 3 April 2013).
Spivak, G.C. (1992) ‘Women in Difference: Mahasweta Devi’s Douloti the Bountiful,’ in A. Parker, M. Russo, D. Sommer and P. Yaeger (eds) Nationalisms and Sexualities (London: Routledge), 96–120.
Wolf, D.L. (1997) ‘Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork,’ in D. Wolf (ed.) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork (Boulder: Westview).
Zellner, A. (2011) ‘Banishing Imposter Syndrome,’ Grad Hacker Industries, 2 September, www.gradhacker.org/2011/09/02/banishing-impostor-syndrome/ (accessed 26 April 2014).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Andrea Zeffiro and Mél Hogan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeffiro, A., Hogan, M. (2015). Suture and Scars: Evidencing the Struggles of Academic Feminism. In: Silva, K., Mendes, K. (eds) Feminist Erasures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454928_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454928_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49805-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45492-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)