Skip to main content

Effects of Heterogeneity on Measuring Efficiency Scores: The Case of China’s Banking Sector

  • Chapter
Experiences and Challenges in the Development of the Chinese Capital Market

Abstract

Banks play a central role in the financial system and also in the real economy, as the 2008 financial crisis has vividly illustrated. The measurement of banking performance has gained importance for both policy makers and practitioners in relation to their decision making. Hence, empirical assessment of the efficiency of banking institutions has received considerable attention in the banking literature (see Berger and Humphrey, 1997; Berger, 2007; Fethi and Pasiouras, 2010 for a comprehensive review of banking efficiency studies). However, efficiency measures can vary substantially across different samples and empirical specifications, which may limit the use of efficiency measures by decision makers. Some previous studies (e.g., Bauer et al., 1998; McKillop et al., 2005; Bos et al., 2009) have compared the efficiency of financial institutions which is obtained using different approaches or specifications. They reported that efficiency scores vary considerably across different models. Therefore, choosing an appropriate frontier model is very important for measuring banking efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K. & Schmidt, P. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunbas, Y., Gardener, E.P.M., Molyneux, P. & Moore, B. 2001. Efficiency in European banking. European Economic Review, 45, 1931–1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. & Coelli, T.J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. & Coelli, T.J. 1988. Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data, Journal of Econometrics, 38, 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.W., Berger, A.N., Ferrier, G.D. & Humphrey, D.B. 1998. Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods, journal of Economics and Business, 50, 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. 1995. The profit-structure relationship in banking. Tests of market power and efficient structure hypotheses, journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27, 404–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. 2007. International comparisons of banking efficiency. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 16, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. & DeYoung, R. 1997. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks, journal of Banking & Finance, 6, 849–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N., Hasan, I. & Zhou, M. 2009. Bank ownership and efficiency in China: What will happen in the world’s largest nation? journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. & Humphrey, D.B. 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. & Mester, L.J. 1997. Inside the Black Box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? journal of Banking & Finance, 2, 895–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, J.P., Hasan, I. & Wachtel, P. 2005. Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries, journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J.W.B., Koetter, M., Kolari, J.W & Kool, C.J.M. 2009. Effects of heterogeneity on bank efficiency score. European journal of Operational Research, 195, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B. & Molyneux, P. 2003. A comparison study of efficiency in European banking. Applied Economics, 35, 1865–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, L. & Rossi, S.P.S. 2002. Do environmental variables affect the performance and technical efficiency of the European banking systems? A parametrical analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. European Journal of Finance, 8, 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B. & Girardone, C. 2006. Bank competition, concentration and efficiency in the single European market. The Manchester School, 74, 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J. 1996. A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. CEPA Working paper, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J., Perelman, S. & Romano, E. 1999. Accounting for environmental influences in stochastic frontier models: With application to international airline. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin, V. 2007. Banking in China. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R. & Nolle, D.E. 1996. Foreign-owned banks in the United States: Earning market share or buying It? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fethi, M. & Pasiouras, F. 2010. Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, S. & Taci, A. 2005. Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X. & Heffeman, S. 2007. Cost X-efficiency in China’s banking sector. China Economic Review, 18, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. 2005. Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 269–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, I. & Marton, K. 2003. Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2249–2271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.P., Lang, W., Mester, L.J. & Moon, C. 1996. Efficient banking under interstate branching. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 1045–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.P. & Mester, L.J. 1993. A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: Evidence on the too-big-to-fail doctrine. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.P. & Mester, L.J. 2008. Efficiency in Banking: Theory, Practice, and Evidence. In Berger, A.N., Molyneux P. & Wilson, J.O.S. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Banking, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isik, I. & Hassan, M.K. 2003. Efficiency, ownership and market structure, corporate control and governance in the Turkish banking industry. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30, 1363–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C.X., Yao, S.J. & Zhang, Z.Y. 2009. The effects of governance changes on bank efficiency in China: A stochastic distance function approach. China Economic Review, 20, 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C.A.K., Materov, LS. & Schmidt, P. 1982. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Jou ni al of Econ om etri cs, 19, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan, K. 1981. An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. & Lovell, C.A.K. 2000. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. & Wang, D. 2007. Economic reforms, efficiency and productivity in Chinese banking. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 32, 105–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D.G., Glass, J.C. & Ward, A. 2005. Cost efficiency, environmental influences and UK credit unions, 1991 to 2001. Managerial Finance, 31, 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. & van den Broeck, J. 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. 1993. Efficiency in the savings and loan industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. 1996. A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences. Journal of Banking Sc Finance, 20, 1025–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. 1997. Measuring efficiency at U.S. banks: Accounting for heterogeneity is important. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M.M. & Lee, L. 1981. The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesia weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poghosyan, T. & Kumbhakar, S. 2010. Heterogeneity of technological regimes and banking efficiency in former socialist economies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezvanian, R. & Mehdian, S. 2002. An examination of cost structure and production performance of commercial banks in Singapore. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensarma, R. 2006. Are foreign banks always the best? Comparison of state-owned, private and Foreign banks in India. Economic Modelling, 23, 717–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.E. 1980. Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. Journal of Econometrics, 13, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecles, P.L. & Tabak, B.M. 2010. Determinants of bank efficiency: The case of Brazil. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1587–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, H. & Satake, M. 2009. Market discipline and bank efficiency. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutes and Money, 19, 792–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Yizhe Dong, Douglas Cumming, Alessandra Guariglia, Wenxuan Hou, and Edward Lee

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dong, Y., Cumming, D., Guariglia, A., Hou, W., Lee, E. (2015). Effects of Heterogeneity on Measuring Efficiency Scores: The Case of China’s Banking Sector. In: Cumming, D., Guariglia, A., Hou, W., Lee, E. (eds) Experiences and Challenges in the Development of the Chinese Capital Market. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454638_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics