Skip to main content

From Doubt to Supposition: the Construction-Specific Meaning Change of the Finnish Verb Epäillä

  • Chapter
Perspectives on Complementation
  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces an interesting meaning change phenomenon concerning the Finnish mental process verb epäillä ‘doubt/suppose’. The chapter will also illustrate how different complementation patterns may affect the interpretation of the main clause verb. In Modern Finnish, the verb epäillä displays a peculiar polysemy: in certain contexts it is interpreted to convey doubt, and in certain other contexts supposition. Both meaning variants describe the epistemic stance of the conceptualizer,1 but the directions of this stance are mutually contrary. This current polysemy is the result of diachronic changes (cf. Hansen 2012: 241).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwood, J., L-G. Andersson and Ö. Dahl (1977) Logic in Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boas, H. (2005) ‘Determining the Productivity of Resultatives. A Reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff’. Language, 81: 448–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortson IV, B.W. (2006) ‘An Approach to Semantic Change’ in B.D. Joseph and R.D. Janda (eds) Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 648–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (2013) ‘Principles of Constructional Change’ in T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 419–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, T. (1978) ‘Negation in Language: Pragmatics, Function, Ontology’ in P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press), pp. 69–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, T. (1991) ‘The Evolution of Dependent Clause Morpho-Syntax in Biblical Hebrew’ in E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds) Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 257–310.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (2013) ‘Constructionist Approaches’ in T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakulinen, L. (1979) Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys [The Structure and Development of Finnish Language] (Helsinki: Otava).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M-B.M. (2012) ‘A Pragmatic Approach to Historical Semantics’ in K. Allan and J.A. Robinson (eds) Current Methods in Historical Semantics (Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton), pp. 233–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpert, M. (2012) ‘Diachronic Collostructional Analysis: How to Use It and How to Deal with Confounding Factors’ in K. Allan and J.A. Robinson (eds) Current Methods in Historical Semantics (Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton), pp. 133–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B. (2006) ‘Grammaticalization’ in B.D. Joseph and R.D. Janda (eds) Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 575–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, P. (1991) ‘On Some Principles of Grammaticization’ in E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds) Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 17–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.R. (1989) A Natural History of Negation (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, R. and G.K. Pullum (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of English Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISK 2004 = Hakulinen, A., M. Vilkuna, R. Korhonen, V. Koivisto, T-R. Heinonen and I. Alho (2004) Iso suomen kielioppi [A Comprehensive Finnish Grammar] (Helsinki: SKS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, S. (2005) ‘The Role of Verb Meaning in Locative Alternations’ in M. Fried and H.C. Boas (eds) Grammatical Constructions. Back to the Roots (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 101–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iyeiri, Y. (2009) ‘The Historical Development of the Verb doubt and Its Various Patterns of Complementation’ in U. Römer and R. Schultze (eds) Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 153–69.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iyeiri, Y. (2010) Verbs of Implicit Negation and their Complements in the History of English (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1917) Negation in English and Other Languages. Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske meddelelser I, 5. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst & søn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1924) The Philosophy of Grammar (London: George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, R. (2014) ‘Näkökulma kirjoitelman dialogisuuteen. Kuinka- ja miten-yhdyslauseet ylioppilasaineessa [Kuinka and miten ‘how’ Clause Constructions in Finnish Matriculation Essays]’. Virittäjä, 118: 72–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen, A. (1998) Puhekuviot, tilanteen ja rakenteen liitto. Tutkimus kielen omaksumisesta ja suomen konditionaalista [A Study of Acquisition of Language and Finnish Conditional Mood] (Helsinki: SKS).

    Google Scholar 

  • KS = Kielitoimiston sanakirja [The New Dictionary of Modern Finnish] (2006) Helsinki: Kotus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (2008) Cognitive Grammar — a Basic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miestamo, M. (2007) ‘Negation — an Overview of Typological Research’. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1/5 (2007): 552–70. OnED = Online Etymology Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, E.F. (1981) ‘Towards a Taxonomy of Given-New Information’ in P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press), pp. 223–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin (1998) ‘Building Verb Meanings’ in M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds) The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors. (Stanford: CLSI), pp. 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAOB = Svenska Akademiens Ordbok. g3.spraakdata.gu.se/saob/

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, S. (2008) ‘Lauseiden tekstuaalisesta jäsennyksestä [On the Textual Organization of Clauses]’. Virittäjä 112(1): 24–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKES = Suomen kielen etymologinen sanakirja [The Etymological Dictionary of Finnish] (1981) (Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura [Finno-Ugrian Society]).

    Google Scholar 

  • SSA = Suomen sanojen alkuperä: etymologinen sanakirja 1: A-K [The Origin of Finnish Words: Etymological Dictionary] (1992) (Helsinki: SKS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (2000) ‘De Dicto Complementation in Japanese’ in K. Horie (eds) Complementation (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 33–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E.C. and G. Trousdale (2010) ‘Gradience, Gradualness and Grammati-calization. How Do They Intersect?’ in E.C. Traugott and G. Trousdale (eds) Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 19–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, A. (2005) Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jutta Salminen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salminen, J. (2015). From Doubt to Supposition: the Construction-Specific Meaning Change of the Finnish Verb Epäillä . In: Höglund, M., Rickman, P., Rudanko, J., Havu, J. (eds) Perspectives on Complementation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450067_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics