Abstract
Adaptation studies has frequently been hamstrung by its own habituated drama of fidelity, where evaluation of each adaptation becomes a game in which the adaptation must be shown to be an insufficiently faithful and thus inevitably inferior copy of a sanctified original. (Puckishly declaring the adaptation to be superior to the original is, alas, only the champions’ tier of this sport.) Recent developments in adaptation theory, however, have begun to move beyond this impasse, turning to texts that have no clear and privileged source material — either too many or too few — and inviting us to consider them as adaptations anyway. Such works push us past the bad conscience of fidelity and infidelity towards a new notion of transtextual exchange that networks varied narratives, genres, and media, reframing adaptation not as some marginal practice of quasi-legitimate textual banditry but as a central component of any creative act.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works cited
Boucher, G. (2012) ‘Cabin in the Woods: After Long Hike, a Sly (and Bloody) Riddle,’ latimes.com, date accessed 26 March 2012.
The Cabin in the Woods (2012) [DVD] directed by Drew Goddard, Lions Gate, US.
Canavan, G. (2014) ‘Something Nightmares Are From: Metacommentary in Joss Whedon’s The Cabin in the Woods,’ Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 10:2/ 11:1.
Cartmell, D. and I. Whelehan (2010) Screen Adaptation: Impure Cinema (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Flood, A. (2014) ‘Superheroes a “cultural catastrophe,” says comics guru Alan Moore,’ TheGuardian.com, date accessed 21 January 2014.
Harman, G. (2013) Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy (Washington: Zero Books).
Houellebecq, M. (2005) H.P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life (San Francisco: Believer Books).
Jameson, F. (2005) Archaeologies of the Future (Durham: Duke University Press).
Lovecraft, H.P. (2013) The Complete Cthulhu Mythos Tales (New York: Fall River Press).
Metz, J. (2014) ‘What’s Your Fetish?: The Tortured Economics of Horror Simulacra in The Cabin in the Woods,’ Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 10:2/11:1.
Nevins, J. (2013) ‘To Understand the World Is To Be Destroyed By It: On H.P. Lovecraft,’ lareviewofbooks.com, date accessed 5 May 2013.
Sanders, J. (2006) Adaptation and Appropriation (New York: Routledge).
Stross, C. (2013) ‘What Scared H.P. Lovecraft,’ Antipope.org, date accessed 27 November 2013.
Whedon, J. and D. Goddard (2012) The Cabin in the Woods: The Official Visual Companion (London: Titan Books).
Whelehan, I. (1999) ‘Adaptations: The Contemporary Dilemmas’ in D. Cartmell and I. Whelehan (eds.) Adaptations: From Text to Screen, From Screen to Text (London: Routledge).
Woofter, K. and J. Stokes (2014) ‘Once More into the Woods: An Introduction and Provocation,’ Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 10:2/11:1.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Gerry Canavan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Canavan, G. (2015). You Think You Know the Story: Novelty, Repetition, and Lovecraft in Whedon and Goddard’s The Cabin in the Woods . In: Hassler-Forest, D., Nicklas, P. (eds) The Politics of Adaptation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443854_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443854_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49542-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44385-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)