Abstract
Deep participation is a basic mechanism underlying social transformation. Found within the context of rapid socioeconomic and political change, it also provides the dynamic center point for formulation of a participatory social theory. Deep participation’s final result is a change-of-type social change characterized by greater inclusiveness and social integration. This potential for harmonious social change is particularly vital in today’s world. Social, political, and economic divisions are intensifying worldwide, and the limitations of simply using political threat or economic coercive power are becoming all too apparent. Deep participation’s potential to assist groups maneuvering through difficult times therefore has positive and far-reaching implications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thomas Cahill (1995), How the Irish Saved Civilization (New York: Anchor Books Doubleday), p. 5.
Immanuel Wallerstein (1999), The End of the World as We Know It (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 121–122.
Randall Collins (1994), Four Sociological Traditions (New York: Oxford University Press).
Mary Douglas (1986), How Institutions Think (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press), p. 114.
Amartya Sen (1992), Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 270–271.
Samir Amin (2009), Eurocentrism, translated by R. Moore and J. Membrez, 2nd edition (New York: Monthly Review Press), p. 23.
David Eagleman (2011), Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain (New York: Vintage Books), pp. 8–9.
The ORAP NGO in Southern Africa often uses this approach. ORAP objectives are described in Sithembiso Nyoni (1987), “Indigenous NGOs, Liberation, Self-Reliance and Development”, World Development Journal: Development Alternatives, Vol. 1, No. 1, supplement, pp. 551–556. This can be found on WorldCat.
Edward Said (1993), Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage Books), pp. 9–10.
James Ferguson (2006), Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), p. 175.
Achille Mbembe (2001), On the postcolony (Berkeley: University of California Press), p. 3. Please note that the word “postcolony” has no capitals.
Bruce Kapferer, ed. (2005), The Retreat of the Social: The Rise and Rise of Reductionism (New York; Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books), p. 3.
Scott Richard Lyons (2010), X-Marks: Native Signatures of Assent (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), p. 30.
Copyright information
© 2015 Paula Donnelly Roark
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roark, P.D. (2015). Formulating a Participatory Social Theory. In: Social Justice and Deep Participation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436870_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436870_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49366-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43687-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)