Skip to main content

From Rome to Maastricht: The Golden Age of an Exceptional Policy?

  • Chapter
Transformations in EU Gender Equality

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to present an overview of the activities of the EC in the fight against inequalities between women and men and the promotion of gender equality, between the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 and the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. In terms of the European integration process in general and gender equality policy in particular, the signing of the Treaty of Rome can be seen as a kind of big bang: the starting point from which everything else sprang. However, although the Treaty was fundamental, it was not final. As we will see in this chapter, the EC’s gender equality policy cannot be limited to primary law; the Treaty’s legal foundations alone do not help us understand the developments in equality that have occurred in the three decades that followed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. International Labour Organisation, Social Aspects of European Economic Co-operation. Report by a Group of Experts, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CJEC, Court ruling of 8 April 1976. Gabrielle Defrenne v. Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena. Case 43/75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Community, Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights for Workers 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission. Amended proposal of the Council directive relative to parental leave and family leave 9 November 1984, COM (84) 631 final (OJ C 316 of 27.11.1984);

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission, proposed directive relative to the burden of proof in the area of equal pay and equal treatment of men and women, 24 May 1988, COM (88) 269 final (OJ C 176 of 05.07.1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. CJEC, Court ruling 25 May 1971. Gabrielle Defrenne v. Belgian State. Case 80–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CJEC, Court ruling 8 April 1976. Gabrielle Defrenne v. Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena. Case 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CJEC, Court ruling 15 June 1978. Gabrielle Defrenne v. Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena. Case 149–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CJEC, Court ruling 15 June 1978. Gabrielle Defrenne v. Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena. Case 149–77, Summary, par. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. CJEC, Court ruling 13 May 1986. Bilka Kaufhaus GmbH v. Karin Weber von Hartz. Case 170/84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CJEC, Court ruling 8 November 1990. Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v. Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV Centrum) Plus. Case C-177/88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CJEC, Court ruling 25 July 1991. Criminal proceedings against Alfred Stoeckel. Case C-345/89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CJEC, Court ruling 17 May 1990. Douglas Harvey Barber v. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group. Case C-262/88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. CJEC, Court ruling 12 July 1984. Ulrich Hofmann v. Barmer Hersatzkasse. Case 184/83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CJEC, Court ruling 17 October 1989. Handels-og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark v. Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting for Danfoss. Case 109/88.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CJEC, Court ruling 8 November 1990. Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v. Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV Centrum) Plus. Case C-177/88.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CJEC, Court ruling 31 March 1981. J.P. Jenkins v. Kingsgate (Clothing Productions) Ltd. Case 96/80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. CJEC, Court ruling 13 May 1986. Bilka Kaufhaus GmbH v. Karin Weber von Hartz. Case 170/84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. United Nations, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Parliament, Resolution on the creation of an ‘ad hoc’ committee on women’s rights, 26 October 1979 (OJ C 289 of 19.11.1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. CJEC Judgment of the Court (Second chamber) of 27 June 1989. J.E. G. Achterberg-te Riele and others v. Sociale Verzekeringsbank. Joined cases 48/88, 106/88 and 107/88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Sophie Jacquot

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacquot, S. (2015). From Rome to Maastricht: The Golden Age of an Exceptional Policy?. In: Transformations in EU Gender Equality. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436573_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics