Abstract
Whether as a subfield of political science or as a discipline in its own right, policy studies have come a long way since Harold Lasswell’s seminal work on the policy cycle (Howlett & Ramesh, 2003, p. 702; Sabatier, 2007; Savard & Banville, 2012). Nowadays, policy scholars use various theoretical frameworks to understand policymaking, including advocacy coalitions (Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1993), multiple streams (Kingdon, 2003), and punctuated equilibrium (Baumgartner & Jones, 2009). To a significant extent, these frameworks emphasize the influence of “ideas,” for instance, worldviews, ideologies, cognitive filters, and causal beliefs, on policy change (Real-Dato, 2009). This should not come as a surprise since ideas have recently gained ascendency in social research alongside the “usual suspects” of interests, institutions, and socioeconomic conditions (Béland & Cox, 2011; Jacobs, 2015).
I wish to thank the editors, Michael Howlett and John Hogan, for their kind invitation to contribute to this volume and for their comments on this chapter. I also thank Daniel Béland for his comments on various versions of this work. This chapter is based on and extends my previous work on policy paradigms, which was mostly conducted while I was a postdoctoral fellow at the Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité sociale du Québec and at the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy (JSGS), University of Saskatchewan Campus. Postdoctoral funding from the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Société et culture (FRQ-SC) and the Canada Research Chair on Public Policy at JSGS is gratefully acknowledged for this period.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and Policy Change. Governance, 26(2), 239–58.
Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Ideas, Paradigms, and Confusions. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 475–80.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agenda and Instability in American Politics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 39(1), 1–18.
Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–18.
Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berman, S. (2013). Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences since “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State.” Governance, 26(2), 217–37.
Bird, A. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Its Significance: An Essay Review of the Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 859–83.
Blyth, M. M. (1997). “Any More Bright Ideas?” The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 229–50.
Boothe, K. (2013). Ideas and the Limits on Program Expansion: The Failure of Nationwide Pharmacare in Canada since 1944. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 46(2), 419–53.
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carson, M., Burns, T. R., & Calvo, D. (Eds.). (2009). Paradigms in Public Policy: Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the EU. Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm Man vs. the Bricoleur: Bricolage as an Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–67.
Carstensen, M. B. (2015). Conceptualising Ideational Novelty: A Relational Approach. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(2), 284–97.
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–51.
Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., & Atkinson, M. M. (1996). Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16(03), 273–301.
Cox, R. H., & Béland, D. (2013). Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability. Governance, 26(2), 307–28.
Daigneault, P.-M. (2014a). Reassessing the Concept of Policy Paradigm: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Policy Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453–69.
Daigneault, P.-M. (2014b). Puzzling about Policy Paradigms: Precision and Progress. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 481–4.
Daigneault, P.-M. (2014c). Three Paradigms of Social Assistance. Sage Open, 4(4), 1–8. doi: 10.1177/2158244014559020
Daigneault, P.-M. (2015). Ideas and Welfare Reform in Saskatchewan: Entitlement, Workfare or Activation? Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique. FirstView [article published online before print], 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S0008423915000098
Daigneault, P.-M., & Jacob, S. (2012). Les concepts souffrent-ils de négligence bénigne en sciences sociales? Eléments d’analyse conceptuelle et examen exploratoire de la littérature francophone à caractère méthodologique. Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, 51(2), 188–204.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2004). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Greener, I. (2001). Social Learning and Macroeconomic Policy in Britain. Journal of Public Policy, 21(02), 133–52. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X01001076
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–96.
Hall, P. A. (2003). Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 373–404). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harper, D. (2001). Paradigm. Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=paradigm
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2007). Re-visiting the New Orthodoxy of Policy Dynamics: The Dependent Variable and Re-aggregation Problem in the Study of Policy Change. Canadian Political Science Review, 1(2), 50–62.
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–46.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (2nd ed.). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Huo, J. (2009). Third Way Reforms: Social Democracy After the Golden Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Process Tracing the Effects of Ideas. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (pp. 41–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2006). Building Blocks for a New Social Architecture: The LEGO Paradigm of an Active Society. Policy & Politics, 34(3), 429–51.
Kay, A. (2006). The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Kay, A. (2007). Tense Layering and Synthetic Policy Paradigms: The Politics of Health Insurance in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 579–91.
Kay, A. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as a Hermeneutic Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 47–63.
Kay, A. (2011). UK Monetary Policy Change during the Financial Crisis: Paradigms, Spillovers, and Goal Co-ordination. Journal of Public Policy, 31(2), 143–61.
Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Measuring and Explaining Policy Paradigm Change: The Case of UK Energy Policy. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 513–30.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012 [1962]). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Leeuw, F. L. (2003). Reconstructing Program Theories: Methods Available and Problems to be Solved. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 5–20.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Change. Bristol: Policy Press.
Oliver, M. J., & Pemberton, H. (2004). Learning and Change in 20th-Century British Economic Policy. Governance, 17(3), 415–41.
Orenstein, M. A. (2013). Pension Privatization: Evolution of a Paradigm. Governance, 26(2), 259–81.
Palier, B. (2005). Ambiguous Agreement, Cumulative Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 127–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, C. (2007). How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Princen, S., & ’t Hart, P. (2014). Putting Policy Paradigms in Their Place. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 470–4.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2008). NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software (Version 8).
Real-Dato, J. (2009). Mechanisms of Policy Change: A Proposal for a Synthetic Explanatory Framework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 117–43.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.). (2007). Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sartori, G. (2009 [1984]). Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In D. Collier & J. Gerring (Eds.), Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori (pp. 97–150). London: Routledge.
Saskatchewan. Government of Saskatchewan. (January 1996). Redesigning Social Assistance: Preparing for the New Century—Discussion Paper. Regina, SK: Department of Social Services.
Saskatchewan. Government of Saskatchewan. (March 1997). Children, Families and Independence: Social Assistance Redesign—Progress Report. Regina, SK: Government of Saskatchewan.
Saskatchewan. Government of Saskatchewan. (n.d.). Building Independence: Investing in Families. Regina, SK: Government of Saskatchewan.
Savard, J.-F., & Banville, R. (2012). Policy Cycles. In L. Côté & J.-F. Savard (Eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration. Québec. Retrieved from www.dictionnaire.enap.ca
Skogstad, G. (Ed.). (2011). Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Skogstad, G., & Schmidt, V. (2011). Introduction: Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. In G. Skogstad (Ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics (pp. 3–35). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Surel, Y. (2000). The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-Making. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4), 495–512.
White, L. A. (2012). Must We All Be Paradigmatic? Social Investment Policies and Liberal Welfare States. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 45(3), 657–83.
Wilder, M. (2014). Ideas Beyond Paradigms: Relative Commensurability and the Case of Canadian Trade-Industrial Policy, 1975–95. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 1004–21.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Pierre-Marc Daigneault
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daigneault, PM. (2015). Can You Recognize a Paradigm When You See One? Defining and Measuring Paradigm Shift. In: Hogan, J., Howlett, M. (eds) Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56900-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43404-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)