Skip to main content

The Stakeholder Organization Theory and its Systemic Foundation Revisited

  • Chapter
The True Value of CSR
  • 1427 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the main systemic arguments that support the so-called stakeholder theory. It starts with Bocheński’s contribution to the philosophy of an enterprise, and then refers to Midgley’s intervention theory in general and the boundary question of an organization, as well as to Friedman and Miles’s critical realist stakeholder theory. Next the issue of praxiological evaluation of human action enriched by ethicality shows the systemic approach to axiological analysis of human activity. Finally, the usefulness of the approach to the problem of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is reviewed and a systemic definition of a responsible company is given. The study then considers De George’s ‘myth of corporate social responsibility’, and links an organization systemically with Bunge’s systemic ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agazzi, E. (1997) Good, Evil and Science (in Polish), OAK Publishers, Warsaw [English edition (2004) Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise, edited by Craig Dilworth, Rodopi, Amsterdam].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocheński, J.M. (1993) ‘Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung’, quoted after Polish translation (a lecture delivered 18 March 1985 at the invitation of the Hofmann Bank AG im Zunfthaus zur Meisen, Zurich), in: Bocheński, J.M. (ed.), Logic and Philosophy, PWN, Warsaw, pp. 162–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1989) Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 8, Ethics: The Good and the Right, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1970) ‘Operation Research as a Profession’, Management Science, 17B, 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De George, R.T. (1996) ‘The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility: Ethics and International Business’ in: Houck, J.W. and Williams, O.F. (eds), Is the Good Corporation Dead? Social Responsibility in a Global Economy, Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp. 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2006) Stakeholder: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparski, W.W. and Ryan, L.V. (2005) ‘Foundations of Corporate Integrity: A Praxiological Approach’ in: Alexandre, V. and Gasparski, W.W. (eds), French and Other Perspectives in Praxiology, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, pp. 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.P. and Moon, J. (eds) (2012) Corporate Social Responsibility: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, Vols. 1–4, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., Polos, L. and Carroll, G.R. (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, J.W. and Williams, O.F. (eds) (1996) Is the Good Corporation Dead? Social Responsibility in a Global Economy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955) ‘The Structural Study of Myth’, Journal of American Folklore, 78 (October–December), 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000) Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L. and Cochius, T. (2011) ISO 26000: The Business Guide to the New Standard on Social Responsibility, Greenleaf Publishing, Aizlewood’s Mill, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (2002) Sociology (in Polish), Znak Publishers, Cracow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983) Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Social Philosophy, Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Wojciech W. Gasparski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gasparski, W.W. (2015). The Stakeholder Organization Theory and its Systemic Foundation Revisited. In: Fryzel, B. (eds) The True Value of CSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433206_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics