Abstract
This chapter presents the main systemic arguments that support the so-called stakeholder theory. It starts with Bocheński’s contribution to the philosophy of an enterprise, and then refers to Midgley’s intervention theory in general and the boundary question of an organization, as well as to Friedman and Miles’s critical realist stakeholder theory. Next the issue of praxiological evaluation of human action enriched by ethicality shows the systemic approach to axiological analysis of human activity. Finally, the usefulness of the approach to the problem of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is reviewed and a systemic definition of a responsible company is given. The study then considers De George’s ‘myth of corporate social responsibility’, and links an organization systemically with Bunge’s systemic ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agazzi, E. (1997) Good, Evil and Science (in Polish), OAK Publishers, Warsaw [English edition (2004) Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise, edited by Craig Dilworth, Rodopi, Amsterdam].
Bocheński, J.M. (1993) ‘Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung’, quoted after Polish translation (a lecture delivered 18 March 1985 at the invitation of the Hofmann Bank AG im Zunfthaus zur Meisen, Zurich), in: Bocheński, J.M. (ed.), Logic and Philosophy, PWN, Warsaw, pp. 162–186.
Bunge, M. (1989) Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 8, Ethics: The Good and the Right, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Churchman, C.W. (1970) ‘Operation Research as a Profession’, Management Science, 17B, 37–53.
De George, R.T. (1996) ‘The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility: Ethics and International Business’ in: Houck, J.W. and Williams, O.F. (eds), Is the Good Corporation Dead? Social Responsibility in a Global Economy, Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp. 17–35.
Drucker, P.F. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2006) Stakeholder: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gasparski, W.W. and Ryan, L.V. (2005) ‘Foundations of Corporate Integrity: A Praxiological Approach’ in: Alexandre, V. and Gasparski, W.W. (eds), French and Other Perspectives in Praxiology, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, pp. 175–190.
Gond, J.P. and Moon, J. (eds) (2012) Corporate Social Responsibility: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, Vols. 1–4, Routledge, London.
Hannan, M.T., Polos, L. and Carroll, G.R. (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Houck, J.W. and Williams, O.F. (eds) (1996) Is the Good Corporation Dead? Social Responsibility in a Global Economy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, London.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955) ‘The Structural Study of Myth’, Journal of American Folklore, 78 (October–December), 428–444.
Midgley, G. (2000) Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York.
Moratis, L. and Cochius, T. (2011) ISO 26000: The Business Guide to the New Standard on Social Responsibility, Greenleaf Publishing, Aizlewood’s Mill, Sheffield.
Sztompka, P. (2002) Sociology (in Polish), Znak Publishers, Cracow.
Ulrich, W. (1983) Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Social Philosophy, Haupt, Berne.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Wojciech W. Gasparski
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gasparski, W.W. (2015). The Stakeholder Organization Theory and its Systemic Foundation Revisited. In: Fryzel, B. (eds) The True Value of CSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433206_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433206_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49261-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43320-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)