Skip to main content

Leadership Frameworks for Interprofessional Learning

  • Chapter
Leadership and Collaboration

Abstract

Shared leadership, where influence is distributed among health professionals, is considered essential for the complex challenges facing healthcare. In this chapter, the concept of shared leadership related to interprofessional practice is discussed. We describe the different types of leaders within healthcare and what team processes support developing shared leadership. In addition, we present the evidence supporting shared leadership and how shared leadership can be measured with social network analysis. We then discuss the implications of these concepts for interprofessional practice and educating health professionals. We conclude with some specific recommendations for training students in shared leadership and interprofessional practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Heart Association. (2010). 2010 handbook of emergency cardiovascular care. Dallas: American Heart Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D. and Naquin, C. (2001). Group learning in organizations. In M. Turner (ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research. New York: Erlbaum: 369–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. and Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharwani, A., Harris, G. and Southwick, F. (2012). A business school view of medical interprofessional rounds: transforming rounding groups into rounding teams. Academic Medicine, 87(12): 1768–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld, N. and Grote, G. (2013). Shared leadership in multiteam systems: How cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety. Human Factors, 56(2): 270–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas, E. and Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. Castellan (ed.), Individual and group decision making: current issues. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 221–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J., Tesluk, P. and Marrone, J. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 1217–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D., Gronn, P. and Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 85 7–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiazGranados, D., Dow, A., Perry, S. and Palesis, J. (2014). Understanding patient care as a multi-team system. In R. Rico, M. Shuffler and E. Salas (eds), Pushing the boundaries: Multiteam systems in research and practice (in press). London: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. and Kukenberger, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership-team performance relations. Journal of Management, ePub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, A., DiazGranados, D., Mazmanian, P. and Retchin, S. (2013). Applying organizational science to healthcare: a framework for collaborative practice. Academic Medicine, 88(7): 952–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 32(1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior on work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 350–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbardissi, A., Regenbogen, S., Greenberg, C., Berry, W., Arriaga, A., Moorman, D. et al. (2009). Communication practices on 4 Harvard surgical services: A surgical safety collaborative. Annals of Surgery, 250(6): 861–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (eds), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, C. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 877–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddara, W. and Lingard, L. (2013). Are we all on the same page? A discourse analysis of interprofessional collaboration. Academic Medicine, 88(10): 1509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the qualty chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (2012). Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., Ziegert, J., Knight, P. and Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 590–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzle, B., Zala-Mezo, E., Wacker, J., Kolbe, M., Spahn, D. and Grote, G. (2010). Leadership in anesthesia teams: the most effective leadership is shared. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(6), e46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L., Vanstone, M., Durrant, M., Fleming-Carroll, B., Lowe, M., Rashotte, J. et al. (2012). Conflicting messages: examining the dynamics of leadership on interprofessional teams. Academic Medicine, 87(12): 1762–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., DeChurch, L., Mathieu, J., Panzer, F. and Alonso, A. (2005). Teamwork in multi-team systems. Journal of Applied Pyschology, 90(5): 964–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. (1962). Leadership behaviour: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, DC: US Civil Service Commission, Office of Career Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, H. and Foti, R. (2013). The impact of shared leadership on teamwork mental models and performance in self-directed teams. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1): 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A. and Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3): 232–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F., DeRue, D. and Karam, E. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1): 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, I. and Edmondson, A. (2006). Making it safe: The effect of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological status and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7): 941–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retchin, S. (2008). A conceptual framework for interprofessional and co-managed care. Academic Medicine, 83(10): 929–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. and McKelvery, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4): 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Waldman, D. and Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leader-ship and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2): 181–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassernman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Learning in communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. and van Fleet, D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organiza-tions. In M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press: 147–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S., Rittman, A. and Marks, M. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12(4): 451–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Alan Dow, Nital Appelbaum and Deborah DiazGranados

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dow, A., Appelbaum, N., DiazGranados, D. (2015). Leadership Frameworks for Interprofessional Learning. In: Forman, D., Jones, M., Thistlethwaite, J. (eds) Leadership and Collaboration. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432094_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics