Skip to main content

Subjectivity in Autistic Language: Insights on Pronoun Atypicality from Three Case Studies

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine a clinical feature typically associated with the speech of children with autism: pronoun reversal and avoidance. Children with autism are reported to use the second-person pronoun you or third-person pronoun he/she to refer to themselves, as well as to use the first-person pronoun I to refer to the person addressed. This behaviour is referred to as pronominal reversal. In addition, affected children make frequent use of proper names to refer to self or the addressee and sometimes deploy agentless passive constructions. These speech patterns are referred to as pronominal avoidance. These phenomena are located at the intersection of linguistic and social-relational processes, and as such they constitute a particularly interesting area of investigation. For the study of language acquisition generally, these phenomena reveal language’s social underpinnings, as well as the relationship between language and the development of self. For autism research, atypical pronoun usage offers potential insights about core features of the condition.

On est en presence d’une classe de mots, les «pronoms personnels», qui échappent au statut de tous les autres signes du langage. A quoi donc je se réfère-t-il? A quelque chose de très singulier, qui est exclusivement langagier: je se réfère à l’acte de discours individual où il est prononcé, et il désigne le locuteur. […] La réalité à laquelle il renvoie est la réalité du discours. C’est dans l’instance de discours où je désigne le locuteur que celui-ci s’énonce comme «sujet». Il est donc vrai à la lettre que le fondement de la subjectivité est dans l’exercice de la langue.

(Benveniste, De la subjectivité dans le langage, 1958)

We are in the presence of a class of words, the ‘personal pronouns,’ that escape the status of all the other signs of language. Then, what does I refer to? To something very peculiar which is exclusively linguistic: I refers to the act of individual discourse in which it is pronounced, and by this it designates the speaker. […] The reality to which it refers is the reality of the discourse. It is in the instance of discourse in which I designates the speaker that the speaker proclaims himself as the ‘subject.’ And so it is literally true that the basis of subjectivity is in the exercise of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, M. J., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, R. (1936). The self- and other-words of a child. American Journal of Sociology, 41, 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartak, L., & Rutter, M. (1974). The use of personal pronouns by autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 4, 217–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E. (1971). Subjectivity in language (Mary Elizabeth Meek, Trans.). Problems in general linguistics (pp. 223–230). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press. (original — 1958 — Journal de Psychologie, 55 — July–September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, R. (1980a). Pronoun errors in autistic children: Support for a social explanation. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 15(1), 39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, R. (1980b). Speech roles and the development of personal pronouns. Journal of Child Language, 7, 509–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiat, S. (1982). If I were you and you were me: The analysis of pronouns in a pronoun-reversing child. Journal of Child Language, 9, 359–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 339–355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In J. Bruner & M. Garman (Eds.), Human growth and development: Wolfson College lectures 1976 (pp. 85–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1908). A study of the early use of self-words by a child. Psychological Review, 15, 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P. S., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1993). Pronoun reversals: Who, when, and why? Journal of Child Language, 20, 573–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. E., & Demuth, K. (2012). Individual differences in pronoun reversal: Evidence from two longitudinal case studies. Journal of Child Language, 39, 162–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, W. H. (1979). Personal pronouns and the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(3), 247–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. R. (1990). On the origins of self and the case of autism. Development and Psychology, 2, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. R. (2010). Explaining autism. Autism, 14(5), 391–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. R. (2011). Autism and the self. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of self (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. R., Lee, A., & Hobson, J. A. (2010). Personal pronouns and communicative engagement in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 653–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Hobson, P. R., & Chiat, S. (1994). I, you, me, and autism: An experimental study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 155–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (2012). Experiencing language. Anthropological Theory, 12(2), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshima-Takane, Y., & Benaroya, S. (1989). An alternative view of pronominal errors in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 73–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no type interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech and Language Research, 53(2), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterponi, L., de Kirby, K., & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking language in autism. Autism, first published online as, doi: 10.1177/1362361314537125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. (1989). The ‘I’ of discourse. In B. Lee & G. Urban (Eds.), Semiotics, self and society (pp. 27–51). Berlin: Mouton the Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, D. D. (1977). Participant deixis in English and baby talk. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 271–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Recommended reading

  • • Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 339–355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • • Sterponi, L., de Kirby, K., & Shankey, J. (2015). Rethinking language in autism. Autism, 19(5), 517–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Laura Sterponi, Kenton de Kirby, and Jennifer Shankey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sterponi, L., de Kirby, K., Shankey, J. (2015). Subjectivity in Autistic Language: Insights on Pronoun Atypicality from Three Case Studies. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428318_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics