Abstract
The struggle to unify the Islamic peoples under religiously sanctified governance by various competing actors has existed since the death of the Prophet Muhammad. No other individual could contain in the same corpus both religious and temporal authority. These religious political challenges to establish a state that exemplified Islamic principles and could be governed by an ordained official had largely been contained within the Islamic world until the contemporary era. The rise and fall of the major caliphates, competing minor dynasties and self-proclaimed individuals was part of the ebb and flow of the Islamic political experience. The twentieth century, however, resulted in the end of the last caliphate, that is, the last political order that spoke to the Islamic legitimacy and unity project, as well as the rise of a different kind of world order. Disparate peoples were colonised and decolonised and sovereign states were formed on the ruins of former empires. A new world order was formed after World War Two and, following the last great empire, the Soviet Union, nation-state sovereignty defined international relations. This order was underwritten by the last remaining superpower, the US, an order that the great powers such as China, Russia, India, Japan and the EU largely observe. In this, the Islamic drive for unity and legitimacy was nearly extinguished. The obstacles provided by the international order and its powerful adherents were unsurpassable. This has had the result of projecting the order and legitimacy project out of the Islamic sphere into the world at large.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Cornelia Beyer (2009) ‘Hegemony Equilibrium and Counterpower: A Synthetic Approach’, International Studies 23 no. 3, 414.
Colin Wight (2009) ‘Theorising Terrorism: The State Structure and History’, International Relations 23 no. 1, 103.
John Huizinga (1957) Varieties of History (London: Thames and Hudson), p. 293.
Feisal Abdul Rauf (2005) What’s Right with Islam is What’s Right With America: A New Vision for Muslims and the West (San Francisco: Harper Collins), p. 177.
David McLellan (1995) Ideology (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), p. 1.
Michael Freeden (2003) Ideology: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 123.
Lyman Tower Sargent (2009) Contemporary Political Ideologies (Belmont: Wadsworth), p. 2.
Simon Blackburn (1994) The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 185.
Bruce B. Lawrence (1995) Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press), p. 79.
Assaf Moghadam (2008) ‘The Salafi-Jihad as a Religious Ideology’, CTC Sentinel 1 no. 3, 15.
Christopher G. Flood (2001) ‘Myth and Ideology’, in Kevin Schilbrack (ed.) Thinking Through Myths: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge), p. 189.
Daniel Philpott (2002) ‘The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations’, World Politics, 55 no. 1, 92.
Ibn Khaldun (1967) The Muqqaddimah: An Introduction to History 1377 (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 5.
Francis Fukuyama (1992) The End of History and the Last Man (New York: The Free Press).
E. H. Carr (1961) What is History (New York: Random House), pp. 161–162.
Alexander Wendt (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 249.
Hedley Bull (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Palgrave).
Alexander Wendt (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organisation 46 no. 2, 391–425.
William W. Newmann (2011) ‘Hegemonic Disruption: The Asymmetric Challenge to US Leadership’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 5 no. 3, 76.
E. H. Carr (2001) The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939, 1939 (London: Palgrave), p. 81.
Ian Clark (2009) ‘Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony’, European Journal of International Relations 15 no. 2, 203–228.
Ian Clark (2011) Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 9.
P. J. Taylor (1996) The Way the Modern World Works: World Hegemon (Chichester: John Wiley), p. 24.
Cornelia Beyer (2008) Violent Globalism: Conflict and Response to Empire (Oxon: Ashgate), p. 17.
Robert Cox (1993) ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’, in Stephen Gill (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 52.
Bruce Cronin and Barak Mendelsohn (2005) ‘Sovereignty Under Attack: The International Society Meets the al-Qaeda Network’, Review of International Studies 31 no. 1, 45.
Ian Clark (2009) ‘Bringing Hegemony Back in: The United States and International Order’, International Affairs 85 no. 1, 23.
Christopher Layne (1993) ‘The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise’, International Security 17 no. 4, 7.
Richard N. Haass (1999) ‘What to do With American Primacy’, Foreign Affairs 78 no. 5, 37.
Robert Pape (2005) ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States’, International Security 30 no. 1, 37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 John A. Turner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, J.A. (2014). Historical and Ideological Challenges. In: Religious Ideology and the Roots of the Global Jihad. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409577_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409577_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48873-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40957-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)