Abstract
The salience of religious activism and mobilizations throughout the contemporary world is perhaps the main reason for the popularity of the notion of the postsecular. The latter is inspired by hopes for greater inclusiveness towards religious groups and their aspirations, realizing that they are not necessarily incompatible with emancipatory political agendas, as well as the insight that religion remains a key component of social and political life that no amount of modernizing ‘progress’ and expansion of scientific knowledge can make disappear. At the same time, the term also owes much of its currency to the assumption that religion had actually been pushed back by modernization processes but has now ‘returned.’ However, an array of scholarship has demonstrated that religion actually never went away but was powerfully transformed by European imperial expansion and the rise of the nation state (Asad, 2003; Masuzawa, 2005; van der Veer, 2001). To make matters more complex, it is now increasingly clear that the modern comparative category of ‘religion’ that provides the basis for any discussion of secularization is actually the product of the same modernization processes that until relatively recently were widely believed to be responsible for an assumed decline of religion. Modern practices of governmentality delineated religion as a sphere of life separate from politics, law, economy, science, and society, and, as such, the universal category of religion is co-constituted through what is frequently regarded as its binary opposite, the secular.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asad, T. (1999). ‘Religion, Nation-State, Secularism.’ In P. van der Veer and H. Lehmann (eds) Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, 178–196. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Asad, T— (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bhargava, R. (2007). ‘The Distinctiveness of Indian Secularism.’ In T.N. Srinivasan (ed.) The Future of Secularism, 20–53. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2008). ‘In Spite of the Times: The Postsecular Turn in Feminism.’ Theory, Culture & Society 25(1), 1–24.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (1999). ‘Occult Economies and the Violence of Abstraction: Notes from the South African Postcolony.’ American Ethnologist 12(2), 291–343.
Csordas, T. (2009). ‘Introduction: Modalities of Transnational Transcendence.’ In T. Csordas (ed.) Transnational Transcendence: Essays on Religion and Globalization, 1–30. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Edun, E.H. (1984). ‘Tajjia (Tazzia).’ In Uttam Bissoondoyal (ed.) Indians Overseas: The Mauritia Experience, 28–34. Moka, Mauritius: Mahatma Gandhi Institute.
Eisenlohr, P. (2006a). ‘The Politics of Diaspora and the Morality of Secularism: Muslim Identities and Islamic Authority in Mauritius.’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 12(2), 395–412.
Eisenlohr, P— (2006b). Little India: Diaspora, Time and Ethnolinguistic Belonging in Hindu Mauritius. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Eisenlohr, P— (2012). ‘Cosmopolitanism, Globalization, and Islamic Piety Movements in Mauritius.’ City & Society 24(1), 7–28.
Madan, T.N. (1998). ‘Secularism in Its Place.’ In R. Bhargava (ed.) Secularism and Its Critics, 297–320. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Masuzawa, T. (2005). The Invention of World Religions, or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nandy, A. (1990). ‘The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance.’ In V. Das (ed.) Mirrors of Violence, 69–93. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Parsuraman, A. (1988). From Ancestral Cultures to National Culture: Mauritius. Moka, Mauritius: Mahatma Gandhi Institute Press.
Robbins, J. (2009). ‘Is the Trans- in Transnational the Trans- in Transcendent? On Alterity and the Sacred in the Age of Globalization.’ In T. Csordas (ed.) Transnational Transcendence: Essays on Religion and Globalization, 55–72. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rudnyckyj, D. (2009). ‘Spiritual Economies: Islam and Neoliberalism in Contemporary Indonesia.’ Cultural Anthropology 24(1), 104–141.
Taylor, C. (2006). ‘Religious Mobilizations.’ Public Culture 18(2), 281–300.
— (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
— (2010). ‘Afterword: Apologia pro Libro suo.’ In M. Warner, J. Vanantwerpen, and C. Calhoun (eds) Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, 300–321. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
van der Veer, P. (2001). Imperial Encounters: Religion and Modernity in India and Britain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Patrick Eisenlohr
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eisenlohr, P. (2014). Religious Aspirations, Public Religion, and the Secularity of Pluralism. In: Braidotti, R., Blaagaard, B., de Graauw, T., Midden, E. (eds) Transformations of Religion and the Public Sphere. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401144_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401144_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48632-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40114-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)