Skip to main content

Participation in the Internet Era

  • Chapter
Reclaiming the Public Sphere

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change ((PSCSC))

  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

The UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression has stressed that he believes the Internet to be one of the most powerful instruments of the 21st century for ‘increasing transparency in the conduct of the powerful, access to information, and for facilitating active citizen participation in building democratic societies’ (La Rue, 2011, p. 4). As an example, the rapporteur highlighted the Arab Spring of 2011, which illustrated the role of the Internet in mobilizing populations in their call for better respect for human rights.1 This chapter presents four different perspectives on digital media as means of public participation, provides empirical examples across different arenas, and discusses the structures / actors that can restrict digital media as means of public participation. I argue that there is positive potential related to the public’s increased ability to communicate and participate in public life, but also new challenges related to participation in the digital domain. One challenge is linked to the role and powers of the private actors that control the digital media. The communication infrastructure and online platforms where social life unfolds critically differ from the physical sphere. There is also a distinction between access to participate in policy processes, and access to the means to influence a particular outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anheier, H. K. and Carlson, L. (2002) Civil Society: What It Is, and How to Measure It. CCS Briefing (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, K. (2004) WSIS Phase II, APC Working paper, (Tunis: PREPCOM I, 23–26 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildt, C. (2011) ‘Freedom of expression on the Internet: Cross-regional statement’, Human Eights Council, 17th session, Geneva, 10 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, T. M. and Todd, L. (2006) ‘The Configuration of Local Economic Power and Civic Participation in the Global Economy’, Social Forces 84(4), pp. 2241–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. (2010) Internet Self-Regulation and Fundamental Rights (London: Index on Censorship), pp. 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C., Gercke, M., De Marco, E. and Dries-Ziekenheiner, H. (2009) Internet Blocking: Balancing Cybercrime Responses in Democratic Societies. Report prepared within the framework of Open Society Institute funding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B. and Carpentier, N. (2005) ‘The unbearable lightness of full participation in a global context: WSIS and civil society participation’, 8. Media@lse. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2011) Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-democratic Struggle (Bristol, England: Chicago Intellect).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009) Communication Power (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2011) ‘Discourses of Technology and Liberation: State Aid to Net Activists in an Era of Twitter Revolutions’, Communication Review 14(3), pp. 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, H. R. (January 21, 2010). ‘Remarks on Internet Freedom’, from http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm, date accessed 6 September 2011.

  • Coleman, S. and J. Blumler (2009) The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. and Gaventa, J. (2001) From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy (Brighton: IDS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. M. (2011) ‘Who Are the 99%? Occupy Research Aims to Find Out’, http://www.shareable.net/biog/who-are-the-99-occupy-research-aims-to-find-out, date accessed 8 December 2011.

  • Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R. and Zittrain, J. (eds) (2010) Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, R. J., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R. and Zittrain J. (eds) (2008) Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) ‘EU directive on e-commerce’ (2000/31/EC). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2012) Inside Occupy (Frankfurt: am Main, Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, M. S. (2009). The Myth of Digital Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, J. et al. (2006) ‘Introduction’ in H. K. Hansen and J. Hoff (eds), Digital Governance://Networked Society (Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press/ NORDICOM), pp. 9–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. (2011) Castells and the Media (Chichester: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, R. F. (2012) ‘Framing the net: How discourse shapes law and culture’, Unpublished thesis, Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies. Copenhagen, Roskilde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S. (2012) ‘Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space and Emerging Logics of Aggregation’, American Ethnologist 39(2), pp. 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rue, F. (2011) ‘Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression’, United Nations General Assembly A/66/290, Human Rights Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, J. (2012) ‘Internet rights are human rights: Freedom of expression, freedom of association and democracy, New issues and threats’. APC Issue Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, J. (EDRI) (2011) The Slide from’ self-regulation’ to Corporate Censorship (Brussels: EDRI)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S.N, Sharma, N. and Sharma, K. (1984) Participation and Development (Delhi, India: NBO Publishers’ Distributors).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2011) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (New York: PublicAffairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (2011) ‘Yet Another Facebook Revolution: Why Are We So Surprised?’, The Guardian, 23 January 2011, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/ jan/23/social-networking-rules-ok, date accessed 12 July 2011.

  • Ó Siochrú, S. (2004) ‘Will the Real WSIS Please Stand Up?: The Historic Encounter of the Information Society and the Communication Society’, Gazette 66(3/4), pp. 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2000) ‘Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation’, Science, Technology and Human Value, 25(1), pp. 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. (2011) ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations’ “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. G. (1983) Impact Assesment and Sustainable Resourse Management (Harlow, UK: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1948) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Comittee (1996) ‘General Comment No. 25: The right to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the right of equal access to public service (art. 25)’, CCPR/C/21/Rev.l/Add.7 (Geneva United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Council (2012) ‘The Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet’, A/HRC/20/L.13 (Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Council (2011) Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eecke, P. and Truyens, M. (2009) EU Study on the New Rules for a New Age? Legal Analysis of a Single Market for the Information Society (Brussels: DLA Piper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerwelle, G. (2011) ‘Die Freiheit im Netz’, Frankfurter Rundschau, http://www.fr-online.de/politik/meinung/die-freiheit-im-netz/-/1472602/8496970/-/, date accessed 14 July 2011.

  • World Summit on the Information Society (2003a) Declaration of Principles (Geneva: WSIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Summit on the Information Society (2003b) Plan of Action (Geneva: WSIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C. (2006) A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Rikke Frank Jørgensen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jørgensen, R.F. (2014). Participation in the Internet Era. In: Askanius, T., Østergaard, L.S. (eds) Reclaiming the Public Sphere. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137398758_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics