Skip to main content

Strange Fascination: Kipling, Benjamin, and Early Cinema

  • Chapter
Virtual Victorians
  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

Published less than a decade after the Lumière brothers mounted the first public exhibition of the cinematograph, Rudyard Kipling’s short story “Mrs. Bathurst” (1904) offers one of the earliest and most troubling accounts of the seductive allure of the virtual—the immaterial realm disclosed by projecting an image onto a reflective surface, such as a screen in the case of the cinematograph, or by illuminating the pixels of a liquid crystal display in a mobile device or computer monitor. As Slavoj Žižek writes, the “virtual,” in this sense, is not simply a product of our increasingly sophisticated means for projecting images; it is also and perhaps more importantly a distinctive fantasy, one that has a history stretching from “prehistoric Lascaux paintings to computer-generated Virtual Reality.”1 What defines this fantasy is the presence of a frame that offers, in its most elementary form, a way of distinguishing between self and other, between where one is and where one is not (and cannot be). “Is not the interface of the computer,” Žižek writes, “the last materialization of this frame? What defines the properly ‘human dimension’ is the presence of a screen, a frame through which we communicate with the ‘suprasensible’ virtual universe to be found nowhere in reality.”2 Where many theorists—from psychoanalytic film scholars of the “suture school” to contemporary theorists of cyberculture—have tended to understand the fascination of the screen in terms of a narcissistic identification with the image it makes present, and in terms of the libidinal pleasures of mastery that such an identification affords, Kipling’s story suggests something altogether more radical.3

The things I look at see me just as much as I see them.

—Valéry

N.B. The images associated with this chapter are housed in the digital annex at www.virtualvictorians.org .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the “suture school” of psychoanalytic film scholarship and the role of narcissism in the experience of cinematic spectatorship, see Christian Metz, “The Imaginary Signifier,” Screen 16, no. 2 (1975): 14–76; Jacques Alain Miller, “Suture (Elements of the Logic of the Signifier),” Screen 18, no. 4 (1977–78): 21–25;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Screen 16, no. 3 (1975): 6–18;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. and Kaja Silverman, The Subject of Semiotics (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983). On the function of narcissism in computer-mediated communications and virtual culture,

    Google Scholar 

  4. see Andre Nusselder, Interface Fantasy: A Lacanian Cyborg Ontology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Claudia Springer, Electronic Eros: Bodies and Desire in the Postindustrial Age (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  6. and Sherry Turlde, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. On the connections between cinema and the exhibitionary culture of the nineteenth century, see Jonathan Crary, Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miriam Bratu Hansen, Babel and Babylon: Spectatorship in American Silent Film (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anne Friedberg, Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  10. and Lynda Nead, The Haunted Gallery: Painting, Photography, Film, c. 1900 (New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. While there are no firsthand reports of spectators openly panicking at the sight of the oncoming train when the Lumières’ films were first exhibited, the fleeting fantasy that it might somehow pass into the theater itself is a commonplace of many contemporary reviews, including (in addition to Gorky’s) those of Felix Renault (in France) and Ottomar Volkmer (in Austria). See Martin Loiperdinger, “Lumière’s ‘Arrival of the Train’: Cinema’s Founding Myth,” The Moving Image 4, no. 1 (2004): 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Veronica Alfano Andrew Stauffer

Copyright information

© 2015 Veronica Alfano and Andrew Stauffer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keep, C. (2015). Strange Fascination: Kipling, Benjamin, and Early Cinema. In: Alfano, V., Stauffer, A. (eds) Virtual Victorians. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393296_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics