Abstract
American social science has always been preoccupied with methodology. In the last twenty-five years, however, it has become a near obsession. While questions around method have always been a concern of the human sciences, twentieth-century U.S. social science is, for the most part, unique in its desire to use methodology as natural science does, to ground its claims to truth. Although social inquiry always employs various techniques—statistical, historical, ethnographic, for example—the effort to emulate what many consider the rigorous methodologies of the natural sciences continues within sociology, psychology, and other disciplines in the human sciences. Arguably the tendency toward privileging methodology is a symptom of the insecurity shared by most branches of the human sciences about the scientific status of their findings. In the tradition of Karl Popper (1934), many in the social sciences have concluded that the task of the social sciences is to construct an exact science of humans and their societies incrementally, strictly eschewing meta-theory. The motto is that science cannot ask a question for which an algorithm or technique is not available for its answer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, Theodor W., et al., 1971. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Alford, Robert R. 1998. The Craft of Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.
Bergson, Henri. [1911] 1944. Creative Evolution. New York: Random House (Modern Library Edition).
Bridgman, P. W. 1929. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan.
Canguilhem, Georges. 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Cliford, James, and George Marcus. eds. 1986. Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. [1888] 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1996. Against Method. London: Verso.
Forman, Paul. 1971. “Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory.” In Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1994. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.
Freud, Sigmund. 1977. The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Avon.
Gadamer, Hans G. 1975. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
Gergen, Kenneth J. [1982] 1994. Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. 2d ed. London: Sage.
—. 1994. Realities and Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Hanson, Norwood R. 1965. Patterns of Discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Henriques, Julian, Wendy Hollway, Cathy Urwin, Couze Venn, and Valerie Walkerdine. [1984] 1998. Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London: Routledge.
Horkheimer, Max. 1992. Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
Hume, David. 1978. Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1962. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by R. Gibson. New York: Collier Books.
—. 1970. Crisis of the European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kuhn, Tomas. 1996. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lather, Jatti. 1986. “Research as Praxis.” Harvard Educational Review. 56(3): 257–277
Levins, Richard, and Richard C. Lewontin. 1986. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mach, Ernst. [1884] 1959. Science of Mechanics. New York: Dover Books.
Marcus, George E., and Michael M. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, Robert. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Popper, Karl. 1934. Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1963. Search for Method. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Vintage Books.
Spinoza, Benedict. 1994. A Spinoza Reader. Edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tylor, Edward B. 1881. Anthropology: An Introduction to the Study of Man and Civilization. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Copyright information
© 2015 Stanley Aronowitz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aronowitz, S., Ausch, R. (2015). A Critique of Methodological Reason. In: Against Orthodoxy. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137387189_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137387189_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43887-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38718-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)