Abstract
International Relations theory has largely remained an effort at producing forms of theorization concentrating on the transcendence of a spatio-temporal particular and on a double autonomization: as a specific locus of interactions, and as specific mode of knowledge production. International theory can be said to pertain to an ephemeral attempt at theorizing an immanently fluid and ever changing set of processes, in which continuous instantiations and relationalities are actualizing a fleeting and ever elusive assemblage we term ‘international’. This chapter mobilizes the concepts of traces (Ginzburg) and assemblage (fr. agencement, Deleuze) in order to highlight what an ephemeral international theory would look like from an ontological, epistemological and normative perspective.
I would like to thank Michele Acuto and Simon Curtis for inviting me to participate to this volume. All translations are my own as well as all errors that probably remain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Xavier Guillaume
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guillaume, X. (2014). Agencement and Traces: A Politics of Ephemeral Theorizing. In: Acuto, M., Curtis, S. (eds) Reassembling International Theory. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48072-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38396-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)