Abstract
Auteurism has a long history in film culture and film studies, with “visionary” directors frequently providing a focal point for readings, and celebrations, of cinematic art (see Staiger). In a recent analysis of US and UK film reviews, Annemarie Kersten and Denise Bielby conclude:
[C]omments related to Auteurism are … significantly more prominent in reviews of films that received critical recognition. Specifically, criticism that focuses on the director as a creative visionary and the interpretation of the universe he or she presents is used the least in reviews of popular films, more so in those of professional [or film industry] prizewinners, and most in reviews of films that achieve critical acclaim. (194–95)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Trans. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990.
Baym, Nancy K. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
Booy, Miles. Love and Monsters: The Doctor Who Experience, 1979 to the Present. London: I.B. Tauris, 2012.
Brooker, Will. Batman Unmasked: Analyzing a Cultural Icon. London: Continuum, 2000.
Butler, David. Fantasy Cinema: Impossible Worlds on Screen. London: Wallflower, 2009.
Eco, Umberto. Faith in Fakes: Travels in Hyperreality. London: Minerva, 1995.
Ferenczi, Aurélien. Masters of Cinema: Tim Burton. London: Phaidon Press, 2010.
Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” Trans. Kari Hanet. Screen xx.1 (Spring 1979): 13–33.
Fowkes, Katherine A. The Fantasy Film. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Furby, Jacqueline and Claire Hines. Fantasy. London: Routledge, 2012.
Gerstner, David. “The Practices of Authorship” in Authorship and Film. Ed. David A. Gerstner and Janet Staiger. New York: Routledge, 2003, 3–25.
Grant, Catherine. “Auteur Machines? Auteurism and the DVD” in Film and Television After DVD. Ed. James Bennett and Tom Brown. New York: Routledge, 2008, 101–15.
Gray, Jonathan. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press, 2010.
Hills, Matt. Fan Cultures. London: Routledge, 2002.
—. “Ringing the Changes: Cult Distinctions and Cultural Differences in US Fans’ Readings of Japanese Horror Cinema” in Japanese Horror Cinema. Ed. Jay McRoy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005, 161–74.
—. “Star Wars in Fandom, Film Theory, and the Museum: The Cultural Status of the Cult Blockbuster” in Movie Blockbusters. Ed. Julian Stringer. London: Routledge, 2003, 178–89.
Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
—. “‘Do You Enjoy Making the Rest of Us Feel Stupid?’: alt.tv.twinpeaks, the Trickster Autor and Viewer Mastery” in Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. David Lavery. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1995, 51–69.
—. Textual Poachers. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Kersten, Annemarie and Denise D. Bielby. “Film Discourse on the Praised and Acclaimed: Reviewing Criteria in the United States and United Kingdom.” Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture. 10.3 (2012): 183–200.
Mathijs, Ernest and Jamie Sexton. Cult Cinema. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Monk, Claire. “Heritage Film Audiences 2.0: Period Film Audiences and Online Fan Cultures.” Participations. 8.2 (2011): 431–77.
Salisbury, Mark, ed. Burton on Burton. London: Faber and Faber, 1997.
Sandvoss, Cornel. Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
Smith, Justin. Withnail and Us: Cult Films and Film Cults in British Cinema. London: I.B. Tauris, 2010.
Staiger, Janet. “Authorship Approaches” in Authorship and Film. Ed. David A. Gerstner and Janet Staiger. New York: Routledge, 2003, 27–57.
Tryon, Charles. Reinventing Cinema: Movies in the Age of Media Convergence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hills, M. (2013). “Tim Is Very Personal”: Sketching a Portrait of Tim Burton’s Auteurist Fandom and Its Origins. In: Weinstock, J.A. (eds) The Works of Tim Burton. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137370839_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137370839_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47542-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37083-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)