Skip to main content

Reframing Gender and Visual Pleasure: New Signifying Practices in Contemporary Cinema

  • Chapter
Sensational Pleasures in Cinema, Literature and Visual Culture
  • 1629 Accesses

Abstract

The term, “to-be-looked-at-ness” (116), coined by Laura Mulvey1 in her seminal article Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, and assigned to women as sexual objects in Hollywood visual culture, has assumed a new egalitarianism in contemporary cinema. While the premise of Mulvey’s essay entailed an objectification of the female body by an assumed male spectator, film now diverges from these norms of female representation. In Mulvey’s model, the classic Hollywood film typically positioned its female as a passive object within the narrative, merely functioning in relation to an active male who prompted the story to unfold. Related studies of masculinity by film scholar Steve Neale2 claimed that the male in film could not be subject to an erotic look because of Hollywood’s underlying fear of homosexuality. However, recent filmmakers adopt increasingly diverse ways of representing and looking at both sexes. For example, Girlfight3 presents its female protagonist in a gender-neutral mode. The framing of Diana Guzman (Michelle Rodriguez) does not distinguish her from her male counter- parts, and lingering shots of her body focus solely on her strength and stamina. Likewise, the cinematography of Black Swan4 accentuates the female lead’s musculature and agility, while both women protagonists propel their respective narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ashcraft, K. and Flores, L. (2003). “Slaves with White Collars: Persistent Performances of Masculinity in Crisis”. Text and Performance Quarterly 23(1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrân, M. (2004). “Mas Macha: The New Latina Action Hero”. In: Yvonne Tasker (ed.), Action and Adventure Cinema. London and New York: Routledge: 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benshoff, H. and Griffin, S. (2009). America on Film: Representing Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality at the Movies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2007). License to Thrill: A Cultural History of the James Bond Films. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M-A. (1993). “Subjectivity and Desire: An(other) Way of Looking”. In: Antony Easthope (ed.) Contemporary Film Theory. London and New York: Longman: 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, R. (2002). Only Entertainment. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fojas, C. (2009). “Sports of Spectatorship: Boxing Women of Color in Girlfight and Beyond”. Cinema Journal 49(1): 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2001) [1953]. A Case of Hysteria: Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funnell, L. (2011). “I know Where You Keep Your Gun’: Daniel Craig as the Bond-Bond Girl Hybrid in Casino Royale”. The Journal of Popular Culture 44(3): 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, G. (1964). Goldfinger. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. (2009). “Male Masochism in Casino Royale.” In: Christoph Lindner (ed.) Revisioning 007: James Bond and Casino Royale. London: Wallflower Press: 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1993). “The Minor Phase”. In Antony Easthope (ed.) Contemporary Film Theory. London and New York: Longman: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley R. and Westlake, M. (1993). “From Casablanca to Pretty Woman: the Politics of Romance”. In: Antony Easthope (ed.) Contemporary Film Theory. London and New York: Longman: 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, K. (2009). “Fighting for Subjectivity: Articulations of Physicality in Girlfight”. Journal of International Women’s Studies 10(3): 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2001). “James Bond’s Penis”. In: Peter Lehman (ed.) Masculinity: Bodies, Movies, Culture. London and New York: Routledge: 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey L. (1993). “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. In: Antony Easthope (ed.) Contemporary Film Theory. London and New York: Longman: 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nale, S. (1993). “Masculinity as Spectacle: Reflections on Men and Mainstream Cinema”. In: Steve Cohan and Ina Rae Hark (eds) Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema. London and New York: Routledge: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omry K. (2009). “Bond, Benjamin, Balls: Technologised Masculinity in Casino Royale.” In: Christoph Lindner (ed.) Revisioning 007: James Bond and Casino Royale. London: Wallflower Press: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2000). Marked Men: Masculinity in Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddell, C. (2007). “Virility and Vulnerability, Splitting and Masculinity”. Extrapolation 48(3): 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey J. (1994). Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, M. (2000). Thelma and Louise. London: BFI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Y (1993a). “Dumb Movies for Dumb People”. In: Steve Cohan and Ina Rae Hark (eds) Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema. London and New York: Routledge: 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Y(1993b). Spectacular Bodies: Gender, Genre and the Action Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tincknell, E. (2009). “Double-O Agencies: Femininity, Post-Feminism and the Female Spy”. In: Christoph Lindner (ed.) Revisioning 007: fames Bond and Casino Royale. London: Wallflower Press: 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremonte, C. and Racioppi, L. (2009). “Body Politics and Casino Royale: Gender and (Inter)national Security”. In Christoph Lindner: The fames Bond Phenomenon: A Critical Reader. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press: 184–201.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

  • Alien. Dir. R. Scott. Perf. S. Weaver, T. Skerritt and J. Hurt. Brandywine Poductions/Twentieth Century-Fox Productions, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Swan. Dir. D. Aronofsky Perf. N. Portman, M. Kurds and V. Cassel. Fox Searchlight Pictures/Cross Creek Pictures/Protozoa Pictures/Phoenix Pictures/ Dime Entertainment, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casino Royale. Dir. M. Campbell. Perf. D. Craig, E. Green and J. Dench. Columbia Pictures/Eon Productions/Casino Royale Productions/Stillking Films/Babelsberg Film/Danjak/United Artists, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. No. Dir. T. Young. Perf. S. Connery U. Andress and B. Lee. Eon Productions, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumb and Dumber. Dirs. P. Fanelly and B. Fanelly Perf. J. Caney J. Daniels and L. Holly. New Line Cinema/Motion Pictures Corporation of America (MPCA), 1994. Fight Club. Dir. D. Fincher. Perf. B. Pitt, E. Noton and H. Bonham Carter. Fox 2000 Pictures/regency Enterprises/Linson Films/Atman Entertainment/Knickerbocker Films/Taurus Film, USA 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girlfight. Dir. K. Kusama. Perf. M. Rodriguez, S. Douglas and J. Tirelli. Green-Renzi/Independent Film Channel (IFC), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinger. Dir. G. Hamilton. Perf. S. Connery, G. Fröbe and H. Blackman. Eon Productions, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Dir. G. Verbinski. Perf. J. Depp, G. Rush and O. Bloom. Walt Disney Pictures/Jeny Bruckheimer Films, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty Woman. Dir. G. Marshall. Perf. R. Gere, J. Roberts and J. Alexander. Touchstone Pictures/Silver Screen Partners IV, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sex and the City. Dir. M. P. King. Perf. S. J. Parker, K. Cattrall and C. Nixon. New Line Cinema/Home Box Office (HBO)/Darren Star Productions, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelma and Louise. Dir. R. Scott. Perf. S. Sarandon, G. Davis, H. Keitel and B. Pitt. Pathé Entertainment/Percy Main/Star Partners III/Metro-Goldwin-Mayer (MGM), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Frances Pheasant-Kelly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pheasant-Kelly, F. (2014). Reframing Gender and Visual Pleasure: New Signifying Practices in Contemporary Cinema. In: Padva, G., Buchweitz, N. (eds) Sensational Pleasures in Cinema, Literature and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363640_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics