Abstract
In the world of public protection the application of sanctions to those assessed as posing a risk of harm takes a significant departure from how most offenders are dealt with. In essence, this distinction is simple to understand; it is based upon the harm people might pose in the future as much as on the harm they have already done. In other words they are to be dealt with for potential, future crimes or harmful behaviour. Indeed, in the most recent developments, discussed below, it is not even necessary for some individuals to have a previous history of criminal behaviour. They, like others, can be brought into the ‘system’ through the use of civil-law-based measures grounded upon a suspicion (or some might say prediction) that they might harm individuals in the future. Underpinning these measures and in essence forming their central rationale is the assessment of the risk of harm an individual may pose to the public. We will discuss risk assessment elsewhere in this chapter and it runs as a theme throughout the volume. Suffice it to say that there should be sufficient doubts about its effectiveness to at least pause the constant introduction of new criminal, civil and regulatory measures deployed against this group. However, any analysis of these measures over the past 2 decades might suggest that the only caution exercised has been the reluctance to be more discriminating in the use of the high-risk or dangerous label; indeed, public protection has become a very inclusive agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACPO (2010). Guidance on protecting the public: Managing sexual offenders and violent offenders (2nd ed., version 2). Wyboston, Beds: NPIA.
Beccaria, C. ([1764] 1986). On aimes and punishments. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.
Best, J. (2001). How claims spread: Cross-national diffusion of social problems. New York: Aldine De Grayter.
Bottoms, A. E. and Brownsword, R. (1982). The dangerousness debate after the Houd report. British Journal of Criminology, 22(3), 229–254.
Brooks, A. D. (1984). Defining the dangerousness of the mentally ill: Involuntary civil commitment. In M. Craft and A. Craft (eds). Mentally abnormal offenders. London: Bailliere, Tindall.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, M. (2010). Theorising dangerousness. In M. Nash and A. Williams (eds). The handbook of public protection (pp. 40–59). Oxon: Willan Publishing.
Charman, S. and Savage, S. P. (2009). Mothers for justice? Gender and campaigns against miscarriages of justice. British founial of Criminology, 49(6), 900–915.
Christie, N. (2000). Crime control as industry: Towards Gulags, Western style. Oxon: Routledge.
Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Conrad, J. P. (1982). The quandary of dangerousness: Towards the resolution of a persisting dilemma. British Journal of Criminology, 22(3), 255–267.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
Floud, J. and Young, W. (1981). Dangerousness and criminal justice. London: Heinemann.
Groves, J. (2013). Firms won £1.4bn in state contracts but paid no tax. The Daily Mail, 12 November, p. 6.
Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (1993). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge.
Hedges, C. and Sacco, J. (2012). Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York: Nation Books.
HM Government (2010). The coalition: Our programme for government. London: Cabinet Office.
Home Office (2002). Protecting the public: Strengthening protection against sex offenders and reforming the laws on sexual offences. Cm 5668. London: Home Office.
Home Office (2010) The Child Sex Offender (CSO) Disclosure Scheme. (Guidance Document).London: HomeOffice, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/184095/disclosure-scheme-guidance.pdf (accessed 28 January 2014).
Infante, F. (2013). Met’s minority report: they use computer algorithms to predict where crime will happen. Mail Online, 29 September, available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2437206/Police-tackle-burglars-mugger s-using-Minority-Report-style-technology-tackle-ruture-crime.html (accessed 11 November 2013).
Jones, O. (2011). Chavs: the demonization of the working class. London: Verso.
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2007) Policy transfer and criminal justice. Exploring US influences over British Crime Control Policy. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Kemshall, H. and Wood, J. (with Sue West wood, Brian Stout, Bernadette Wilkinson, Gill Kelly and Gill Mackenzie) (2010). Child Sex Offender Review (CSOR) public disclosure pilots: A process evaluation (2nd edn). Research Report 32. London: Home Office.
Kvaraceus, W. C. (1966). Anxious youth. Ohio: Columbus.
Magee, B. (2012). The greed of private prisons, available at https://americanhu-manist.org/hnn/details/2012-08-the-greed-of-private-prisons (accessed 11 November 2013).
MOJ (2010). Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders. CM 7972. London: The Stationery Office.
MoJ (2013). Offender management statistics quarterly bulletin: October to December 2012, England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/off ender-management-statistics-quarterly-2 (accessed 15 November 2013).
Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
NAPO (2013). What is ‘medium risk’ — an analysis. A briefing from NAPO — 9th October 2013. London: NAPO.
Nash, M. (1999). Police, probation and protecting the public. London: Blackstone.
Nash, M. (2006). Public protection and the criminal justice process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nash, M. and Williams, A. (2008). The anatomy of serious further offending. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nash, M. and Williams, A. (eds). (2010). The handbook of public protection. Oxon: Willan Publishing.
Newburn, T. (2002). Atlantic crossings: Policy transfer and crime control in the USA and Britain. Punishment and Society, 4(12), 165–194.
Newburn, T. (2007). Tough on crime: Penal policy in England and Wales. Criminal Justice, 70, 425–470.
Prins, H. (2010). Dangers by being despised grow great. In M. Nash and A. Williams (eds). The handbook of public protection (pp. 15–39). Oxon: Willan Publishing.
Prison Reform Trust (2007). Indefinitely maybe? How the indeterminate sentence for public pro tection is unjust and unsu stainable. London: PRT
Prison Reform Trust (2010). Unjust desserts: Imprisonment of public protection. London: PRT.
Savage, S. P. and Charman, S. (2010). Public protectionism and’ sarah’s Law’: Exerting pressure through single-issue campaigns. In M. Nash and A. Williams (eds). The handbook of public protection (pp. 434–453). Oxon: Willan Publishing.
Simon, J. (2009). Governing through crime: How the war on aime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
Strickland, P. and Grimwood, G. G. (2013). The abolition of sentences of imprisonment for public protection. SN /HA/6086. London: House of Commons. Available at http://www.google.co.uk/url? sa=t&rct =j &q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd= 1 &ved= 0CCAQFjAA&url=
The Guardian (4 November 2013). Probation and profit are incompatible, 4 November, available at http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/04/ probation-profit-incompatible (accessed 7 January 2014).
Vess, J. (2010). Forensic risk assessment: Public protection versus offender rights. In M. Nash and A. Williams (eds). The handbook of public protection (pp. 87–102). Oxon: Willan Publishing.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Williams, A. and Thompson, B. (2004a). Vigilance or vigilantes: The Paulsgrove riots and policing paedophiles in the community. Part 1: The long slow fuse. The Police Journal, 77(2), 99–119.
Williams, A. and Thompson, B. (2004b). Vigilance or vigilantes: The Paulsgrove riots and policing paedophiles in the community. Part 2: The lessons of Paulsgrove. The Police Journal, 77(3), 199–205.
Williams, A. (2006). Paedophiles, panics and protests: Understanding penal populism. Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, 31, 52–72.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Andrew Williams and Mike Nash
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, A., Nash, M. (2014). The Realities of Legislating Against and Protecting the Public from Risky Groups. In: McCartan, K. (eds) Responding to Sexual Offending. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358134_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358134_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47099-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35813-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)