Skip to main content

Organizational Self-Awareness: A Matter of Value

  • Chapter
Organization Design and Engineering

Abstract

This chapter aims at clarifying the notion of organization se If-awareness (OSA) as the state of a collective awareness of the enterprise system. We examine how such awareness arises from the collective action of the enterprise’s agents, while applying principles and methods of enterprise engineering and enterprise architecture. We find that value modeling is a vital enabler of OSA while bridging the gap between the teleological and ontological views of an enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, R. (2013). Enterprise Architecture Artifacts as Boundary Objects — A Framework of Properties. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21th European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, R., Tribolet, J., and Winter, R. (2013). Transformation of Multi-level Systems — Theoretical Grounding and Consequences for Enterprise Architecture Management. Paper presented at the Advances in Enterprise Engineering VII, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B., Johannesson, P., and Bergholtz, M. (2009). Purpose Driven Value Model Design. Paper presented at the Proc. CAiSE workshop BUSITAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveiro, D. (2010). G.O.D. (Generation, Operationalization & Discontinuation) and Control (Sub)Organizations: A DEMO-Based Approach for Continuous Real-Time Management of Organizational Change Caused by Exceptions. UTL, Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveiro, D., Silva, A. R., and Tribolet, J. (2010a, June 4–5, 2010). Extending the Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations with the Generation Operationalization and Discontinuation Organization. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveiro, D., Silva, A. R., and Tribolet, J. (2010b, June 4–5, 2010). Towards a G.O.D. Organization for Organizational Self-Awareness. Paper presented at the 6th International Workshop, CIAO! 2010, held at DESRIST 2010, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveiro, D., Silva, A. R., and Tribolet, J. (2011, May 16–17, 2011). Control Organization: A DEMO Based Specification and Extension. Paper presented at the First Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, EEWC 2011, Antwerp, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (2003). Value-Based Software Engineering. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28(2), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, B., Leaver, S., and Worthington, B. (2009). Value-Based Communication Boosts Business’ Perception of IT. Forrester Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. (2003). The Atoms, Molecules and Fibers of Organizations. Journal Data & Knowledge Engineering — Special Issue: The Language/Action Perspective Archive, 47(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. (2008). Architecture — Building Strategy into Design. The Hague, The Netherlands: Netherlands Architecture Forum, Academic Service — SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G., Hoogervorst, J. A. P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., et al. (2013). The Discipline of Enterprise Engineering. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 3(1), 86–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J. (2002). Value-Based Requirements Engineering: Exploring Innovatie E-Commerce Ideas. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, S. (2012). Enterprise Dynamic Systems Control Enforcement of Run-Time Business Transactions Using DEMO: Principles of Design and Implementation. Instituto Superior Técnico — Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. (1999). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kundisch, D., John, T, Honnacker,J., and Meier, C. (2012). Approaches for Business Model Representation: An Overview. Paper presented at the Multikonferenz Wirt Schaftsinformatik 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. An introductory Volume (8 ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. D. (1970). Multilevel Systems and Concepts in Process Control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 58(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missikoff, M., Chaiabilidis, Y., Goncalves, R., and Popplewell, K. (2012). Future Internet Enterprise Systems — Research Roadmap 202S — version 2.0. European Commission, Technical report by the EC. HQ at Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Op ‘t Land, M., and Pombinho, J. (2012). Strengthening the Foundations Underlying the Enterprise Engineering Manifesto. Paper presented at the 2nd Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). The Business Model Ontology — A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., and Tribolet, J. (2012). Towards Objective Business Modeling in Enterprise Engineering — Defining Function, Value and Purpose. Paper presented at the 2nd Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., and Tribolet, J. (2013). Value-Oriented Solution Development Process — Uncovering the Rationale behind Organization Components. Paper presented at the 3rd Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., and Tribolet, J. (2014). Linking Value Chains-Combining e3 Value and DEMO for Specifying Value Networks. Paper presented at the Fourth Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, EEWC 2014, Funchal, Madeira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyttner, L. (2005). General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice (2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open Group (2012). Archimate2.0Specification. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1973). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: G. Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Hayperuma, T., et al. (2006). On the Notion of Value Object. Paper presented at the CAiSE 2006, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, R. J. (2006). Requirements Engineering: Frameworks for Understanding. Amsterdam: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. J., and Butler, B. S. (2011). Creating Bigger Problems: Grand Challenges as Boundary Objects and the Legitimacy of the Information Systems Field. Journal Of Information Technology, (26), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacarias, M., Magalhàes, R., Caetano, A., Pinto, H. S., and Tribolet, J. (2007). Towards Organizational Self-Awareness: An Initial Architecture and Ontology. In Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction. Lisboa, Portugal, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 José Tribolet, João Pombinho and David Aveiro

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tribolet, J., Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D. (2014). Organizational Self-Awareness: A Matter of Value. In: Magalhàes, R. (eds) Organization Design and Engineering. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351579_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics