Skip to main content

Abstract

What is ‘asexuality’? While answers to this question would once have predominantly involved references to biological processes, it is increasingly likely that someone asking this question will receive a rather different response: an asexual person is someone who does not experience sexual attraction.Bogaert (2004) was an early and influential contribution to the literature on asexuality reporting on a secondary analysis of the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (NATSAL), in which 1.05% of participants reported never having experienced sexual attraction towards anyone. Follow-up studies on the next generation of NATSAL found 0.5% of respondents falling into this category (Bogaert, 2012, p. 45). While asexual people are numerous, it is still difficult to be clear about how numerous they are. First, these results do not indicate identificationas asexual, but only experiences which have, in other instances, led people to identify as such. Second, there are important questions which can be raised about the criterion of having neverexperienced sexual attraction, reflecting different orientations to how we understand something like ‘asexuality’. The question “what is asexuality?” is much more complicated than it can initially seem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further reading

References

  • Asexuality Visibility and Education Network (2011). General FAQ.Retrieved from http://www.asexuality.org/home/gener al. html.

  • Barker, M. (2012). Rewriting the rules: An integrative guide to love, sex and relationships.London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. R (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. R (2006). Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. R (2008). Asexuality: Dysfunction or variation. In j. M. Caroll & M. K. Alena (Eds.) Psychological sexual dysfunctions, (pp. 9–13). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Biomedical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. R (2012). Understanding asexuality.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootle, O. (2009). No sex please: An asexual life. The Independent.Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/no-sex-please-an-as exual-lif e-16 4 63 4 7. ht ml.

  • Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed-methods approach. Archives of Sexual behavior, 39(3), 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14(4), 462–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canigan, M. (2012). How do you know you don’t like it if you haven’t tried it? Asexual agency and the sexual assumption. In T. G. Monison, M. A. Morrison, M. Canigan, & D. T. McDermott (Eds.) Sexual minority research in the new millennium, (pp 3–19). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canigan, M. (2013). Asexuality and its implications for sexuality studies. Psychology of Sexualities Review, 4(1). Retrieved from http://markcanigan.net/2013/12/03/asexuality-and-its-implications-for-sexuality-studies-2/ [Accessed 11 December 2014].

  • Canigan, M., Gupta, K., & Morrison, T. G. (2013). Asexuality special theme issue editorial. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerankowski, K.J. & Milks, M. (2010). New orientations: Asexuality and its implications for theory and practice. Feminist Studies, 650–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerankowski, K. J. & Milks, M. (Eds.) (2014). Asexualiti.es: Feminist and queer perspectives.London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasin, C. D. (2011). Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality. Archives of Sexual behavior, 40(4), 713–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasin, C. D. (2013). Reconsidering asexuality and its radical potential. Feminist Studies, 39(2), 405–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasin, C. D. (2014). Making sense in and of the asexual community: Navigating relationships and identities in a context of resistance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, [online first] (doi: 10.1002/casp.2203). [Formerly titled: Amoeba in our habitat: The asexual community from an ecological perspective.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire.Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. (2013). Re-thinking community in the digital age? In K. Orton-Johnson & N. Prior (Eds.) Digital sociology: Critical perspectives, (pp. 79–95). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flore, J. (2014). Mismeasures of asexual desires. In K. J. Cerankowski & M. Milks (Eds.) Asexualities: Feminist and queer perspectives, (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, S. B. & Morrison, M. A. (2011). Asexuality: An emergent sexual orientation. In T. G. Monison, M. A. Monison, M. Canigan, & D. T. McDermott (Eds.) Sexual minority research in the new millennium, (pp. 21–44). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinderliter, A. (2013). How is asexuality different from hypoactive sexual desire disorder? Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2012). Challenge it, report it, stop it. The Government’s plan for dealing with hate aime.Easy Read Document. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97850/easy-read-hate-crime-action-plan.pdf.

  • Kahan, B. (2013). Celibacies: American modernism and sexual life.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. (2010). How much sex is healthy? The pleasures of asexuality. In J. M. Metzl & A. Kirkland (Eds.) Against health: How health became the new morality, (pp. 157–169). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. (2011). Asexuality in disability narratives. Sexualities, 14(4), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2011). Analysis of the 2011 Asexual Awareness Week Community Census.Retrieved from http://asexualawarenessweek.com/docs/SiggyAnalysis-AAWCensus.pdf.

  • Prause, N. & Graham, C. A. (2007). Asexuality: Classification and characterization. Archives of Sexual behavior, 36(3), 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przybylo, E. (2011). Crisis and safety: The asexual in sexusociety. Sexualities, 14(A), 444–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybylo, E. (2013). Afterword: Some thoughts on asexuality as an interdisciplinary method. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 193–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. & Barker, M. (2013). Sexuality and gender for mental health professionals: A practical guide.London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11(5), 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, K. S. (2010a). What asexuality contributes to the same-sex marriage discussion. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 22(1-2), 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, K. S. (2010b). Asexual relationships: What does asexuality have to do with polyamory? In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.) Understanding Non-monogamies.(pp. 154–159). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. & Dawson, M. (2014). Rethinking asexuality: A Symbolic Interactionist account. Sexualities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swankivy. (2012). Shit people say to asexuals(Video file). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/wat ch ?v =W BabpK_nvsO.

  • Wallis, L. (2012). What is it like to be asexual? BBC News Magazine.Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-1655 2173.

  • Westphal, S. P. (2004). Feature: Glad to be asexual. New Scientist.Retrieved from http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6533-feature-glad-to-be-asexual.html.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Mark Carrigan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carrigan, M. (2015). Asexuality. In: Richards, C., Barker, M.J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345899_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics