Skip to main content

‘Le pouvoir de faire dire’: Marginalia in Mary Queen of Scots’ Book of Hours

  • Chapter
Material Cultures of Early Modern Women’s Writing

Part of the book series: Early Modern Literature in History ((EMLH))

Abstract

Recent work on early modern women’s marginalia has already revealed much about the ways in which early modern women read and wrote, using the materials of manuscript and print as markers of relationships and as tools for self-positioning.1 However, as Heidi Brayman Hackel has argued, such traces are thought to be relatively rare, and, to date, studies of substantial archives of marginalia have centred on books annotated by two authors: Margaret Hoby and Anne Clifford.2 In this chapter, I would like to begin to examine a third significant archive: Mary Queen of Scots’ diverse collection of marginalia in her Book of Hours.3 This illuminated fifteenth-century manuscript was given to Mary during her time in the French court and was added to over her lifetime and beyond.4 It contains three different types of marginalia: the queen’s independent marks of ownership, ten other signatures and fourteen quatrains, or fragments of quatrains, some signed and all written in French in Mary Stuart’s very clear italic hand. This chapter examines all three of these types of marginalia in order to reconstruct what Jason Scott-Warren describes as ‘the anthropology of the book’: evidence not only for reading but also for understanding the place of this Book of Hours in the individual, social and material fabric of the lives of its owners and readers over half a century.5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Heidi Brayman Hackel, Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender and Literacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. William H. Sherman, Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Jason Scott-Warren, ‘Reading Graffiti in the Early Modern Book’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 73 (2010): 363–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Helen Smith, ‘Grossly Material Things’: Women and Book Production in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen Orgel, ‘Marginal Maternity: Reading Lady Anne Clifford’s Mirror for Magistrates’, in Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, ed. Douglas Brooks (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 245–65. Margaret Hoby’s marginalia has recently been discussed by Julie Crawford, ‘Reconsidering Early Modern Women’s Reading, or, How Margaret Hoby Read Her de Mornay’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 73 (2010): 193–223 and Andrew Cambers, ‘Reader’s Marks and Religious Practice: Margaret Hoby’s Marginalia’, in Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning, ed. John N. King (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 211–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See David Angus, ‘Mary’s Marginalia’, Review of Scottish Culture, 3 (1987): 9–12. As Angus notes, marginal dates indicate that the Book of Hours was in Mary’s possession as early as 1554, and the evidence of various signatures suggests that the book remained in England until at least 1615. Patricia Z. Thompson draws upon Alexandre Laborde’s work to date the manuscript at c. 1430; it was originally executed for the House of Luxembourg, and later passing to the House of Guise before it was acquired by Mary Stuart. She also offers a lively account of the wider acquisition practices of Peter Petrovich Dobrovskii, who was responsible for bringing the manuscript to Russia and its current place in the manuscript department of the Saltykov-Shchedrin State Public Library, the National Library of Russia in St Petersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Patricia Z. Thompson, ‘Biography of a Library: The Western European Manuscript Collection of Peter P. Dubrovskii in Leningrad’, The Journal of Library History, Philosophy and Comparative Librarianship, 19 (1984): 477–503.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The fourteen poems and fragments were reproduced in the nineteenth century by Prince Alexandre Labanoff, Lettres, instructions et memoires de Marie Stuart, reine d’É’cosse, 7 vols (London, 1852), vol. 7, pp. 348–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jason Scott-Warren, ‘Reading Graffiti in the Early Modern Book’, The Huntington Library Quarterly, 73 (2010): 363–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Apart from David Angus’ article, the manuscript has been discussed in Natalia Elagina, ‘Manuscripts and Documents on Mary Queen of Scots, in the collection of the National Library of Russia’, Studies in Variation, Contact and Change in English, 9 (2011): 1–13. Lisa Hopkins discusses a quatrain written by Mary Stuart in the margins of a Mass book belonging to her aunt Anne of Lorraine in ‘Writing to Control: The Verse of Mary, Queen of Scots’, in Reading Monarchs Writing: The Poetry of Henry VIII, Mary Stuart, Elizabeth I, and James I, ed. Peter C. Herman (Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2002), pp. 36–9, as does Peter Herman in Royal Poetrie: Monarchic Verse and the Political Imaginary of Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010), pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Seth Lerer, ‘Literary Prayer and Personal Possession in a Newly Discovered Book of Hours’, Studies in Philology, 109 (2012): 409–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eamon Duffy, Marking the Hours: English People and their Prayers 1240–1570 (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kathleen Ashley, ‘Creating Family Identity in Books of Hours’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 32.1 (2002): 147–65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Charity Scott-Stokes, Women’s Books of Hours in Medieval England (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2006), pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janet Backhouse, Books of Hours (London: The British Library Reference Division Publications, 1985), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Susan M. Felch, Elizabeth Tyrwhit’s Morning and Evening Prayers (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Virginia Reinburg, French Books of Hours: Making an Archive of Prayer, c. 1400–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Lisa Jardine and Anthony Grafton, ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past and Present, 129 (1990): 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See also Lisa Jardine and William Sherman, ‘Pragmatic Readers: Knowledge Transactions and Scholarly Services in Late Elizabethan England,’ in Religion, Culture and Society in Early Modern Britain, eds Anthony Fletcher and Peter Roberts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 102–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Matt Cohen, The Networked Wilderness: Communicating in Early New England (Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2010), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Evelyn Tribble, Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1993), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For selected historical accounts of Mary Queen of Scots’ life, see Retha M. Warnicke, Mary Queen of Scots (London and New York: Routledge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. John Guy, Queen of Scots: The True Life of Mary Stuart (New York: Mariner Books, 2005) and My Heart is My Own: The Life of Mary Queen of Scots (London: HarperPerennial, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Susan Watkins, Mary Queen of Scots (London: Thames & Hudson, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Antonia Fraser, Mary Queen of Scots (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969; reprinted New York: Random House, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jenny Wormald, Mary Queen of Scots: A Study in Failure (London and New York: I. B. Taurus, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. For work on signature, see Scott-Warren, ‘Reading Graffiti in the Early Modern Book’, p. 367 and Jonathon Goldberg, Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance (Stanford, CA: University of California Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Megan Moore, ‘Illuminating the Four Evangelists: A Comparison of Depiction in the Flemish Book of Hours and French Book of Hours,’ p. 4. http://frenchbookofhours.weebly.com/illuminating-the-four-evangelists-a-comparison-of-depiction-in-the-flemish-book-of-hours-and-french-book-of-hours-by-megan-moore.html [accessed 20 October 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  29. James McDermott, ‘Howard, Charles, Second Baron Howard of Effingham and First Earl of Nottingham (1536–1624)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Jan 2008 http://www.oxforddnb.com.library.newcastle.edu.au/view/article/13885 [accessed 31 October 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anne Duffin, ‘Clinton, Edward Fiennes de, First Earl of Lincoln (1512–1585)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004); online edn Jan 2008 http://o-www.oxforddnb.com.library.newcastle.edu.au/view/article/5679 [accessed 10 July 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Micheline White, ‘Dismantling Catholic Primers and Reforming Private Prayer: Anne Lock, Hezekiah’s Song and Psalm 50/51’, in Private and Domestic Devotion in Early Modern Britain, eds Jessica Martin and Alec Ryrie (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2012), pp. 98–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elizabeth I, ‘The doubt of future foes’, in Collected Works, eds Leah S. Marcus, Janel Mueller and Mary Beth Rose (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For an illuminating account of Elizabeth I and Mary Stuart’s textual rivalry, see Jennifer Summit, Lost Property: The Woman Writer and English Literary History, 1380–1589 (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  34. For the female subject’s use of the volatility of example in popular and elite complaint, see Rosalind Smith, ‘“A goodly sample”: Exemplarity, rhetoric and true crime in female gallows confession’, in Women and the Poem, ed. Susan Wiseman (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013), pp. 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Peter Marshall and Alexandra Walsham, Angels in the Early Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. David Keck, Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 170–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Rosalind Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, R. (2014). ‘Le pouvoir de faire dire’: Marginalia in Mary Queen of Scots’ Book of Hours. In: Pender, P., Smith, R. (eds) Material Cultures of Early Modern Women’s Writing. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342430_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics