Skip to main content

Encouraging Generosity: The Practice and Organization of Fund-Raising across Nations

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy

Abstract

The international collaboration in this book creates a unique opportunity to establish, discuss and draw conclusions about fund-raising across nations. Based on the 26-country dataset provided by the authors in this volume, this chapter describes and analyzes for the first time the diverse fund-raising environments around the world that are shaped by different historical, cultural, social, religious, political and economic conditions. It begins by noting the lack of research on fund-raisers and fund-raising in contrast to the extensive studies undertaken of donors and argues that the demand side of charitable transactions is worthy of greater attention if a complete and dynamic understanding of giving is to be achieved. It then presents and discusses key themes related to fund-raising in the countries represented in this book. A typology is suggested to impose order on the huge variety of fund-raising approaches and stages of development in the organization of this activity around the world; this typology also strengthens understanding of the connection between asking and giving. After offering suggestions for future research in this area of study, the chapter ends by noting that despite global differences in the evolution of fund-raising as a profession and the diversity of current contexts, fund-raisers in every country face shared challenges that would benefit from greater exchange of knowledge and best practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, B.A., & Schmitz, M.D. (1978). The ‘crowding out’ effect of government transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice, 33(1), pp. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACOSS (2005). Giving Australia: Research on Philanthropy in Australia. Summary of Findings. Retrieved October 24, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/statistics/eprint/61389/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35(1), pp. 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1998). Towards a theory of charitable fundraising. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), pp. 1186–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5), pp. 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelov, G. (2011). What happened to donations in 2010?. Politiki, 9, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, S., Hall, M., & Vodarek, L. (2009). Perspectives on Fundraising: What Charities Report to the Canada Revenue Agency. Toronto, Canada: Imagine Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. (1999). Fundraising in Brazil: The major implications for civil society organizations and international nonprofit organizations. Development in Practice, 9(1–2), pp. 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich can Save the World. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackbaud (2011). 2011 State of The Nonprofit Industry Executive Overview. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from https://events.blackbaud.com.au/document.doc?id=18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackbaud (2012). 2012 State of The Nonprofit Industry Survey Summary Report. Retrieved August 1, 2014, from https://www.blackbaud.com/files/resources/soni_final_2012.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeze, B. (2012). The Coutts Million Pound Donors Report. London, UK: Coutts and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagney, P., & Ross, B. (2013). Global Fundraising: How the World Is Changing the Rules of Philanthropy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Canada Help (2013). Homepage. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from http://www.canadahelp.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W.B. (1997). Fund raising and the college presidency in an era of uncertainty: From 1975 to the present. Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), pp. 53–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cutlip, S.M. (1965). Fundraising in the United States: Its Role in America’s Philanthropy. New Brunswick, UK: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012). Interim Report on Progress in Bulgaria under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/cvm/docs/com_2012_57_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • France Générosités & CerPhi (2012). Evolution de la générosité en France [Evolution of Giving in France]. Paris, France: CerPhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasman, M. (2004). Rhetoric vs. reality: The fundraising messages of the United Negro College Fund in the immediate aftermath of the Brown decision. History of Education Quarterly, 44(1), pp. 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giving USA (2012). The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year2006. New York: Giving USA Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. (1998). Bazaars and Fair Ladies: The History of the American Fundraising Fair. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., Keenan, E.A., & Gneezy, A. (2014). Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Science, 346(6209).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong SAR Government (2012). Hong Kong: The Facts, Social Welfare. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from http://www.gov.hk/en/abouthk/lactsheets/docs/social_welfare.pdl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hristova, D. (2011). SMS Charity?. Politiki, 3, pp. 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoft, D., & Rölling, M. (2009). The potential of web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable rundraising NPOs’. Public Relations Review, 35(1), pp. 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel Gives (2013). Homepage. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from http://www.israelgives.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S., & Mukai, R. (2011). Foundation Growth and Giving Estimates. New York: Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, R., & Tandon, A. (2012). Emerging Philanthropy Markets. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(4), pp. 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, R. (2007). Two thousand years of disreputable history. In J. Mordaunt & R. Paton (Eds.), Thoughtful Fundraising: Concepts, Issues and Perspectives (pp. 9–18). Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (1987). Building Troyes Cathedral: The Late Gothic Campaigns. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCVO/CAF (2012). UK Giving Survey. London, UK: NCVO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayr, M., & Schober, C. (2012). Giving in Austria: Factors Influencing Giving Behavior of the Austrian Population (Projektbericht). Wien: Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Philanthropic Trust (2012). Philanthropy Timeline. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from http://www.nptrust.org/history-ol-giving/timeline/1600s/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, T. (2007). Japanese fundraising: A comparative study of the United States and Japan. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 7(3), pp. 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, Z., Altinkemer, K., De, P., & Ozcelik, Y. (2010). Donor-to-nonprofit online marketplace: An economic analysis of the effects on fund-raising. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), pp. 213–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M. (2000). Charity ends with the lottery: It ain’t what you give, it’s the way that you give it. New Economy, 7(2), pp. 120–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PIRAC (Public Interest Research and Advocacy Centre, Indonesia) (2002). Investing in Ourselves: Giving and Fundraising in Indonesia. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). Do government grants to charity reduce private donations. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions (pp. 313–329). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round-up Israel (2013). Homepage. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from http://www.round-up.org.il/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal National Lifeboat Institution (2013). RNLI History. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from http:/rnli.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/RNLIhistorydownloadablefactsheet.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A. (2011). 2011 State of the Nonprofit Industry Executive Overview. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from https://events.blackbaud.com.au/document.doc?id=185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., Hudson, J., & Wilson, S. (2012). Donor complaints about fundraising: What are they and why should we care?. Voluntas, 23, pp. 791–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., & Jay, E. (2004). Fundraising Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shier, M., & Handy, F. (2012). Understanding online donor behavior: The role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 27(3), pp. 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, V., & Elder, S. (2000). Becoming a fundraiser: The Principles and Practice of Library Development. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedham, A. (2012). Charitable Giving, Fundraising, and Faith-Based Organizations: Islamic Relief World Wide and World Vision International — A Comparison. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/international_history_politics/shared/working_papers/WPIH_11_Tedham.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M. (2013). Fun and fundraising: The selling of charity in New Zealand’s past. Social History, 38(1), pp. 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Oxford English Dictionary (2013). Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, J. (2006). Nonprofit fund-raising in competitive donor markets. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), pp. 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, D. (2010). You Have a Noble Profession (Conference Presentation April 13, 2010. Baltimore, MD and the 47th Association of Fundraising Professionals International Conference). Retrieved August 1, 2014, from http://call2action.com/news/2010–04-16/you-have-noble-profession.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Way Worldwide (2013). Homepage. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from http://worldwide.unitedway.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • VFI (2012). Persbericht Week van het Testament [Week of the Will]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, T. (2010). Nonprofit Organizations in Germany. In K.J. Hopt & T. von Hippel (Eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organizations (pp. 197–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B., & Dominguez, N. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior?. Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), pp. 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Beth Breeze and Wendy Scaife

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breeze, B., Scaife, W. (2015). Encouraging Generosity: The Practice and Organization of Fund-Raising across Nations. In: Wiepking, P., Handy, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341532_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics