Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

Governance offers a broad perspective on the functioning of society. It is assumed that governance takes place between many rather than few actors. Networks play an important role in the study of governance, signifying not only the multitude of actors, but also the different types of actors such as public and private organizations or civic engagement. There is also an emphasis on the processes of governing rather than on structures of government. To put it otherwise, processes of governance highlight ‘soft’ coordination mechanisms, such as negotiation, alliance formation and cooperation, in contrast to ‘hard’ methods of command and control (Kersbergen and Van Waarden, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Alford (2002) ‘Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspective’, Public Administration Review, 62, 3, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Becker, B. Niehaves and A. Krause (2009) ‘Shared Service Center vs. Shared Service Network: A Multiple Case Study Analysis of Factors Impacting on hared Service Configurations’, Electronic government. Lecture notes in computer science, 5693, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Bergvall, C. Charbit, D.-J.Rraan and O. Merk (2005) ‘Intergovernmental Transfers and Decentralised Public Spending’, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5, 4, 111–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Burt (1992) Structural Holes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Caplow (1956) ‘A Theory of Coalitions in the Triad’, American Sociological Review, 21, 4, 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Caplow (1968) Two Against One: Coalitions in Triads (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Cerny (1997) ‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’, Government and Opposition, 32, 2, 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Clifton, F. Comîn and D. Diaz Fuentes (2006) ‘Privatizing Public Enterprises in the European Union 1960–2002: Ideological, Pragmatic, Inevitable?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 5, 736–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Dal Bo (2006) ‘Regulatory Capture: A Review’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 2, 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Dunleavy (1989) ‘The Architecture of the British Central State, Part I: Framework for Analysis’, Public Administration, 67, 3, 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow and J. Tinkler (2006) Digital Era Governance: FT Corporations, the State, and e-Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Dyer and H. Singh (1998) ‘The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23, 4, 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europa (2012) European Comission, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/reform/reform html (home page), date accessed 23 November 2013.

  • M. Everson, G. Majone, L. Metcalfe and A. Schout (1999) The Role of Specialised Agencies in Decentralising EU Governance. Report Presented to the Commission (Florence and Maastricht: European Comission).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Fernandez and R.V. Gould (1994) ‘A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain’, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 6, 1455–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Gallagher (2005) ‘Benchmarking Tax Systems’, Public Administration and Development, 25, 2, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Gamson (1961) ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review, 26, 3, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Gilardi, J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (2006) Regulation in the Age of Globalization: The Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies across Europe and Latin America (Barcelona: IBEI working papers).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.F. Gortner, J. Mahler and J.B. Nicholson (1997) Organization Theory: A Public Perspective (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter (1974) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers, 2nd edn (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Hardiman and C. Scott (2010) ‘Governance as Polity: An Institutional Approach to the Evolution of State Functions in Ireland’, Public Administration, 88, 1, 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Harlow (2006) ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’, European Journal of International Law, 17, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Heider (1946) ‘Attitudes and Cognitive Organization’, Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GA. Hodge, C. Grève and A.E. Boardman (2010) International Handbook on Public Private Partnerships (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • K. Kersbergen and R Van Waarden (2004) ‘Governance’ as a Bridge between Disciplines. Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability, and Legitimacy’, European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.RM. Koppenjan and B. Enserink (2009) ‘Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability’, Public Administration Review, 69, 2, 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Krackhardt (1999) ‘The Ties That Torture: Simmelian Tie Analysis in Organization’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Majone and P. Baake (1996) Regulating Europe (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. M esterton-Gibbons, S. Gavrilets, J. Gravner and E. Akçay (2011) ‘Models of Coalition or Alliance Formation’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 27 A, 1, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.B. Milward and K. Provan (2003) ‘Managing the Hollow State Collaboration and Contracting’, Public Management Review, 5,1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Moran (2002) ‘Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State’, British Journal of Political Science, 32, 2, 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Nutt and R. Backoff (1992) Strategic Management of Public and Third Sector Organizations: A Handbook for Leaders (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Oates (2005) ‘Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism’, In tenia Hon a I Tax a rid Pu Mi c Fi ri a ri ce, 12, 4, 349–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Distributed Public Governance (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) OECD Efficiency Study. Working Party of Senior Budget Officials (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • K.G. Provan and P. Kenis (2007) ‘Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 2, 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Putnam (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ryu, C. Bowling, C. Cho and D. Wright (2008) ‘Exploring Explanations of State Agency Budgets: Institutional Budget Actors or Exogenous Environment?’, Public Budgeting & Finance, 28, 3, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Shah (2007) ‘A Framework for Evaluating Alternate Institutional Arrangements for Fiscal Equalization Transfers’. In J. Martinez-Vazquez and B. Searle (eds), Fiscal Equalization (New York: Springer), 141–162.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • M. Shaw (1954) ‘Some Effects of Problem Complexity upon Problem Solution Efficiency in Different Communication Nets’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48,3,211-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Simmel (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Glencoe, IL: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Simon (1971) ‘Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World’. In M. Greenberger (ed.), Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press), 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unstats (2014) Classification of the Functions of the Government. http://unstats.un.org (homepage), date accessed 6 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Van Slyke (2009) ‘The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century’. In R. O’Leary and L. Bingham (eds), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Walsh, M. Mcgregor-Lowndes and C.J. Newton (2008) ‘Shared Services: Lessons from the Public and Private Sectors for the Nonprofit Sector’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 2, 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Wasserman and K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J.Q. Wilson (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Jan-Erik Johanson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johanson, JE. (2014). Strategic Governance in Public Agencies. In: Joyce, P., Bryson, J.M., Holzer, M. (eds) Developments in Strategic and Public Management. IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336972_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics