Skip to main content
  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

Innovation is not an option for firms these days, especially those operating in an international context. It is essential for competing, indeed surviving, in today’s rapidly changing and increasingly digital world. We believe that in order to understand how innovation in a digital world can be managed, supported and promoted, we must view it in an interdisciplinary way. This book takes a first step towards building such a view by first discussing perspectives from a number of different disciplines and then examining the ideas that arise from the interaction between them. This happens to be a well-known technique of innovation in general. In this introduction, we develop the rationale for a particular set of perspectives that, we believe, are essential for understanding innovation: strategic management, operations management economics, and information systems (IS). Moreover, as innovation is increasingly organized across national borders and organizational boundaries, we choose to pay special attention to innovation in the context of international business and open innovation.1

Both authors contributed equally

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharonson, B.S. (2008), The technological landscape: Competition and opportunity, PhD. Thesis, University of Toronto, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. (1986), ‘Organizational structure, information technology and R&D productivity’, Working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2008), ‘Service system fundamentals: Work system, value chain and life cycle’, IBM Systems Journal, 47(1): 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W.R. (1956), An introduction to cybernetics, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bard, J.R, Balachandra, R., and Kaufmann, P.E. (1988), ‘An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35: 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., Gregory, R., and Prifling, M. (2008), ‘Cultural intelligence and project management interplay in IT offshore outsourcing projects’, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besson, P. and Rowe, F. (2012), ‘Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A trans-disciplinary review and new directions’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2): 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorn, P. and Ngwenyama, O. (2009), ‘Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence’, Information Systems Journal, 19(1): 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R., Tenkasi, R., and Te’eni, D. (1994), ‘Designing information technology to support distributed cognition’, Organization Science, 5: 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L. (1970), Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. (2004), ‘Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries’, Organization Science, 15(5): 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebon, P. and Newton, P. (1999), ‘Innovation in firms: Towards a framework for indicator development’, Melbourne Business School Working Paper 99–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971), The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organization, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, C. G., Chand, D., Newell, S., and Resende-Santos, J. (2008), ‘Integrated collaboration across distributed sites: The perils of process and the promise of practice’, Journal of Information Technology, 23(1): 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibiaggio, L. (2012), ‘The governance of knowledge integration’, in Dibiaggio, L. and Meschi, X. (Eds), Management in the knowledge economy: New managerial models for success, 25–44, Paris: Pearson France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor, P. and Segev, E. (1978), Managing management information systems, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichman, R. (2004), ‘Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods’, Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 5(8): 314–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. (1974), ‘Organization design: An information processing view’, Interfaces, 4(3): 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, M., Ernst, H., and Proserpio, L. (2007), ‘How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(2): 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lings, B., Lundell, B., Agerfalk, P., and Fitzgerald, B. (2006), ‘Ten strategies for successful distributed development, in the transfer and diffusion of IT for organisational resilience’, Proceedings of the WIP WG8.6 Working Conference, National University of Ireland, Galway, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1991), ‘Exploration and exploitation in organization learning’, Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merali, Y., Papadopoulos, T, and Nadkarni, T. (2012), ‘Information systems strategy: Past, present, future?’ Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2): 125–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merminod, V. and Rowe, R (2012), ‘How does PLM technology support knowledge transfer and translation in new product development? Transparency and boundary spanners in an international context’, Information and Organization, 22(4): 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2003), ‘Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development’, MIS Quarterly, 27(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2013), Information technology and product/service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research, JAIS, 14(Special Issue): 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. and Wilemon, D. (2000), ‘Software development and new product development: Potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2): 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13(3): 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasmore, W.A. (1988), Designing effective organizations: The socio technical systems perspective, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P.A. and El Sawy, O.A. (2006), ‘From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development’, Information Systems Research, 17(3): 198–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, F., Marciniak, R., and Clergeau, C. (2011), ‘The contribution of information technology to call center productivity: An organizational design analysis’, Information Technology ana People, 24(4): 336–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S., Keinschmidt, E.J., and De Brentani, U. (2010), ‘Managing new product development teams in a globally dispersed NPD program’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7): 955–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990), The fifth discipline, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ughetto, E. (2008), ‘Does internal finance matter for R&D? New evidence from a panel of Italian firms’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6): 907–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2000), Product design and development, 2nd edition, oNew York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. (1986), Central problems in the management of innovation, ManagementScience, 32(5):590-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Offenbeck, M., Boonstra, A., and Seo, D. (2013), ‘Towards integrating acceptance and resistance research: Evidence from a telecare case study’, European journal of Information Systems, 22(4): 434–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy L. (1968), General system theory: Foundations, development, applications, New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Zedwitz, M., Gassman, O., and Boutellier, R. (2004), ‘Organizing global R&D: challenges and dilemmas’, journal of International Management, 10(1): 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, E., Teigland, R., Donnellan, B., and Golden, W. (2010), ‘How Internet technologies impact information flows in R&D: Reconsidering the technological gatekeeper’, R&D Management, 40(4): 400–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, E., Golden, W., and Donnellan B. (2013), ‘Digitising the R&D social network: Revisiting the technological gatekeeper’, Information Systems journal, 23(3): 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010),” The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research’, Information Systems Research, 21(4): 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Dov Te’eni and Frantz Rowe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Te’eni, D., Rowe, F. (2014). Introduction: A Systemic View of Innovation. In: Rowe, F., Te’eni, D. (eds) Innovation and IT in an International Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336132_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics