Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: The Crossroads of Creativity and Ethics

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Creativity

Abstract

“More creativity!” seems to be the current mantra for success. Institutions, cities, and nations seek globally for people who will” break the mold,”” cultivate disruption,” or” hack the future” to provide competitive advantage and” stay ahead of the curve.” Several higher education institutions have augmented their traditional strengths of general and professional knowledge by promoting the” twenty-first-century skills” of creativity and collaboration.

“New is better.”” Innovate faster.”” Change the world.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, R., & Barabâsi, A.L. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 45(2), 357–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P. E. Ill, Kolodinsky, R. W., & Charette, B. J. (2009). Understanding the complex relationship between creativity and ethical ideologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative behavior, 41(3), 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (1993). Theater of the Oppressed. New York: Theatre Communications Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In J. S. Bruner, On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, S. I. (2005). The Origins of the Russell-Einstein Manifesto. Washington, DC: Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, http://www.pugwash.org/ publication/phs/history9.pdf, accessed July 8, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabria, M., Lentz, R., Karecki, M., Omar, I., & Cusato, M. (2008). Daring to Embrace the Other: Tranciscans and Muslims in Dialogue. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassandro, V.J., & Simonton, D. K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative behavior, 44(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughron, J. J., Shipman, A. S., Beeler, C. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Social innovation: Thinking about changing the system. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 29(1), 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B., Wotruba, T. R., & Loe, T. W. (2003). Ethics code familiarity and usefulness: Views on idealist and relativist managers under varying conditions of turbulence. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some Do Care: Contemporary Lives of Moral Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, M. W., & Moran, S. (2008). All the wiser: Wisdom from a systems perspective. Invited talk at University of Chicago Arete Initiative, Chicago, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2007). Creativity and responsibility. In H. Gardner (ed.), Responsibility at Work (pp. 64–80). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, A. S. (1978). Dimensions of Moral Creativity: Paradigms, Principles, and Ideals. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arlach, L., Sanchez, B., & Feuer, R. (2009). Voices from the community: A case for reciprocity in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daloz, L., Keen, C, Keen, J., & Parks, S. (1996). Common Tire: Lives of Commitment in a Complex World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, W. C. (2010). Asset bubble and the implications for central bank policy. Speech at Economic Club of New York, New York, April 7. http://www.bis.org/review/rl00409c.pdf, accessed November 11, 2013.

  • Erikson, E. (1958). Young Man Luther. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2012). TheRise of the Creative Class: Revisited. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Ol other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, S, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good Work: When Ethics and Excellence Meet. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Moral satisficing: Rethinking moral behavior as bounded rationality. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 528–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, R, & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side ol creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, R, Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The ellect ol one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3): 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaveanu, V. R (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength ol weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity ol others is the mother olinven-tion: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. Chicago, IL: University ol Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1993). Creativity in the moral domain: Ought implies can implies create. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1-2), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, S, AAA-ASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimerà, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, J. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J, & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Allect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(A), 613–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E., & Horn, H. (2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Rosson, P. (2006). The impact ol technological turbulence on entrepreneurial behavior, social norms and ethics: Three internet-based cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy olthe commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H. (1993). Moral creativity and education for citizenship. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havel, V. (1997). The Art of the Impossible: Politics as Morality in Practice. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, R. (1990). Mathematics and ethics. Mathematical Intelligencer, 12, 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We Make the Road by Walking: Conversations on Education and Social Change (B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters, eds.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1955). Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R.E. Money-Kyrle (eds.), New Directions in Psychoanalysis (pp. 478–498). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M. (2010). The innovation dilemma: Some risks of creativity in strategic agency. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 91–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the Mind: Explorations in Thinking, rev. edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2009). Categories of novelty and states of uncertainty. Review of General Psychology, 13(4), 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1989). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licuanan, B. R, Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P. (2009). Ethical imagination and design. Design Studies, 30, 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1991). The ethic of aesthetics. Theory, Culture and Society, 8(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, T., & Dowd, K. (2007). Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, N. (2005).” Saffron” gives us taste of immigrants’ lives in Chicago. Chicago Tribune, July 5. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2005–07-05/features/0507040197_l_restaurant-immigrants-meal, accessed November 11, 2013.

  • Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009a). Creativity: A systems perspective. In T. Richards, M. Runco, & S. Moger (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Creativity (pp. 292–301). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009b). Metaphor foundations of creativity research: Boundary versus organism. Journal of Creative behavior, 43(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009c). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010a). Changing the world: Tolerance and creativity aspirations among American youth. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010b). Commitment and creativity: Transforming experience into art. In C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjano vie-Shane (eds.), Vygotsky and Creativity: A Cultural-Historical Approach to Meaning-Making, Play, and the Arts (pp. 141–160). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010c). Creativity in school. In K. S. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. K. Staarman (eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 319–360). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010d). Returning to the Good Work Project’s roots: Can creative work be humane? In H. Gardner (ed.), Good Work: Theory and Practice (pp. 127–152). Cambridge, MA: Good Work Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010e). The roles ol creativity in society. In J. C. Kaulman & R. J. Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 74–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2012). Book review: The dark side ol creativity (D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaulman, & M.A. Runco, eds.). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 295–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & Gardner, H. (2006). Extraordinary cognitive achievements: A developmental and systems analysis. In W. Damon (series ed.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (vol. eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, Perception, and Language, 6th edn. (pp. 905–949). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contribution to the dialectic ol creativity and development. In K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. Sternberg, D. Feldman, et al. (eds.), Creativity and Development (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (eds.), Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 11–25). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhr, S. L. (2010). Ethical interruption and the creative process: A reflection on the new. Culture and Organization, 26(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E., & Nadler, J. (2008). Moral spillovers; The effect ol moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1239–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustalson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., etal. (2010). Creativity and ethics: The relationship ol creative and ethical problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliner, S. P., & Oliner, P. M. (1988). The Altruistic Personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. (2007).” Amazing Grace” tells the story ol British abolition. NPR Fresh Air Irom WHYY, March 15. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8926395, accessed November 11, 2013.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century (the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture). Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983[1962]). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1993). Creative morality: Intentional and unconventional. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1-2), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2010). Creativity has no dark side. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 15–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (2003). Creativity in the moral domain: Integration and implications. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2007). The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, R. (2011). Understanding the future of change agency in sustainability through cellular automata scenarios: The role of timing. Sustainability, 3, 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, R. S., & Gero, J. S. (2004). Diffusion of creative design: Gatekeeping effects. International Journal of Design Computing, 4, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, R. S., & Gero, J. S. (2005). A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 19(4), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1966). Class, status, and power among jazz and commercial musicians. Sociological Quarterly, 7(1), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1971). Commitment to Deviance. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1993). Moral issues facing intermediaries between creators and the public. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. R, Jarvin, L., Moga, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom from gatekeepers: Secrets of success in music performance. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4(1), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, E. (1996). Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2006). In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1991). The beyonders and their characteristics. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 16, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1993). The beyonders in a thirty year longitudinal study of creative achievement. Roeper Review, 15, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and Human Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics ol” small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684): 440–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (2001). Moral Freedom. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, D. (2012). Dynamics ol creativity and empathy in role reversal: Contributions from neuroscience. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clark University, USA

    Seana Moran

Authors
  1. Seana Moran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Clark University, USA

    Seana Moran

  2. University of South Australia, Australia

    David Cropley

  3. University of Connecticut, USA

    James C. Kaufman

Copyright information

© 2014 Seana Moron

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, S. (2014). Introduction: The Crossroads of Creativity and Ethics. In: Moran, S., Cropley, D., Kaufman, J.C. (eds) The Ethics of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation