Abstract
John Stuart Mill left an extraordinarily rich, if ambiguous and much contested, legacy to later modern moral and political philosophy.1 This inheritance is usually understood as offering a vigorous defence of negative liberty. But it is often recognized that Mill was also committed strongly to promoting social and political virtue.2 This promotion can be construed in turn as a defence of a particularly robust ideal of active citizenship, where the exercise of both social and political duties is guided by stringent ethical standards that are distinctive from the idea of ethical citizenship defended by British Idealists that the other contributors to this book examine. In political life, the pole-star was of course to be utility, or the common good, not individual or class interest. Mill did not regard the franchise as a right, and late in life turned against the secret ballot as inimical to the exercise of political virtue.3 In society, Mill famously promoted a principle of liberty by which actions that were self-regarding and did not ‘harm’ others were broadly to be tolerated. The question of just how coherent this concept was has generated one of the most substantial — and in terms of its practical applications, important — debates in modern liberalism.4 What is clear, at least, at the outset, is that Mill regarded the problem of moral regulation within society of paramount importance. Carlyle and the Saint-Simonians helped him to appreciate the role of ‘spiritual’ elites, the clerisy, and ‘heroic’ figures in forming opinion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Sociology (3 vols, New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1905), 2
Erving Goffman, Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order (London: Penguin Books, 1971).
Maurice Cowling, Mill and Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963), p. xii
Maurice Cowling, Mill and Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963).
Joseph Hamburger, John Stuart Mill on Liberty andControl (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p. 200.
Ferdinand David Schoeman, Privacy and Social Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 31–32
Alexander Bain, John Stuart Mill. A Criticism. With Personal Recollections (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1882), pp. 108–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Gregory Claeys
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Claeys, G. (2014). Mill, Moral Suasion, and Coercion. In: Brooks, T. (eds) Ethical Citizenship. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329967_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329967_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46076-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32996-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)