Abstract
British society is going through a sustained period of change, which has been accompanied by controversy and debate. This change was stimulated by major economic shifts, the transformation to a multicultural society, and closer integration with the European Union. In such times of transition, rhetoric comes to the fore as a way for social actors to articulate the shape of problems and to search for solutions by integrating the new with the old. Rhetoric allows individuals to symbolically frame these changes, to adapt to change and to preserve tradition, but always with a political slant because the linguistic representation of the world is a powerful way to define reality and shape conceptions of a possible future. The chapters in this book reveal much about the nature of rhetorical power and how it is used in British politics and society. Through rhetoric, individuals — whether the prime minister, public commentators, journalists or ordinary Britons — cope with change and stake their own claims about what it is to be British, about who should be praised and who vilified, about what makes British culture and about what we should do politically to adapt to social change. The very idea of Britishness is negotiated through rhetoric, although never with a single voice. Rhetoric is a language of multiplicity, of metaphors and metonymy, a world created through implied meaning in which it is necessary for the audience to interpret who is included in the vision of the nation, a vision which is always contested.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle (2004) The Art of Rhetoric (London: Penguin Books Ltd).
Atkins, J. (2011) Justifying New Labour Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Atkins, J. and Finlayson, A. (2013) ‘“... A 40-Year-Old Black Man Made the Point to Me”: Anecdotes, Everyday Knowledge and the Performance of Leadership in British Politics’, Political Studies, 61(1), p. 161–177.
Cameron, D. (2011) ‘King James Bible’, Speech, 16 December, available: http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=326, accessed 12 November 2013.
Charteris-Black, J. (2012) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, 2nd Edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Edwards, G.C. (2003) On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Finlayson, A. (2002) ‘Elements of the Blairite Image of Leadership’, Parliamentary Affairs, 55, 586–599.
Goodin, R.E. and Saward, M. (2005) ‘Dog Whistles and Democratic Mandates’, The Political Quarterly, 76(4), 471–476.
Lakoff, G. (2002) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Martin, J. (2014) Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge).
Tulis, J.K. (1987) The Rhetorical Presidency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Judi Atkins and Nick Turnbull
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkins, J., Turnbull, N. (2014). Conclusion: Rhetoric, British Identity and Interdisciplinarity. In: Atkins, J., Finlayson, A., Martin, J., Turnbull, N. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Rhetoric, Politics and Society Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45941-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32553-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)