Abstract
This chapter juxtaposes recent governmental political rhetoric intended to convince the electorate that their priorities include local-level concerns about fairness in contemporary Britain, with rhetoric in society and the everyday explanations and sensibilities of ‘fairness’, as in what is perceived to be fair on local and individual levels. As an anthropological contribution to this multidisciplinary discussion of British political rhetoric, this chapter addresses rhetoric as a kind of discourse used by individuals in relationships with others, with an audience, that functions in flexible ways depending on the context of its usage. It deals specifically with the indeterminacy of rhetorical action and the everyday micro-politics of intentionality which the language of fairness mediates. It takes rhetoric out of the sphere of formal politics into culture, showing that rhetoric is defined by the innovative use of language in everyday life as much as in the speeches of political leaders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Back, L. (1996) New Ethnicities and Urban Culture: Racisms and Multiculture in Young Lives (London: UCL Press).
Battaglia, D. (1995) ‘Problematising the Self: A Thematic Introduction’, in D. Battaglia (ed.), Rhetorics of Self-Making (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Betz, H-G. (1993) ‘The New Politics of Resentment: Radical Right-wing Populist Parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Politics, 25(4), 413–427.
Butler, J. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (London: Routledge).
Cameron, D. (2009) ‘Making Progressive Conservatism a Reality’, Speech to Demos, 22 January, http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/01/David_Cameron_Making_progressive_conservatism_a_reality.aspx, date accessed 12 October 2013.
Carrithers, M. (1992) Why Humans have Cultures: Explaining Anthropology and Social Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Carrithers, M. (2005) ‘Why Anthropologists Should Study Rhetoric’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(3), 577–583.
Clarke, J. (2005) ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilised, Abandoned?’ Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 447–463.
Cohen, T. (1999) ‘Identifying with Metaphor: Metaphors of Personal Identification’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(4), 399–409.
Duncan Smith, I. (2013) ‘Restoring Fairness to the Welfare System’, Speech, Conservative Party Conference, Manchester, UK, http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2011/10/Duncan_Smith_Restoring_fairness_to_the_welfare_system.aspx, date accessed 12 October 2013.
Edwards, J., Evans, G., and Smith, K. (2012) ‘Introduction: The Middle-Classification of Britain’, Focaal: The Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 62, 3–16.
Finlayson, A. (2007) ‘From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis (RPA)’, Political Studies Association, 9, 545–563.
Finlayson, A. and Martin, J. (2008) ‘“It ain’t what you say...”: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech Rhetoric’, British Politics, 3, 445–464.
Griffiths, S. and Hickson, K. (eds) (2010) British Political Parties and Ideology after New Labour (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Hall, S. (2005) ‘New Labour’s Double-Shuffle’, Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 27(4), 319–335.
Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate Politics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Hill, J. (2008) The Everyday Language of White Racism (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
McAnulla, S. (2010) ‘Heirs to Blair’s Third Way? David Cameron’s Triangulating Conservatism’, British Politics, 5(3), 286–314.
Modood, T. (2010) Still Not Easy Being British: Struggles for a Multicultural Citizenship (Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books Ltd).
Osborne, G. (2010) ‘Emergency Budget’, Speech, http://www.conservatives.com/News/.../Budget_2010.aspx, date accessed 13 October 2013.
Parkin, D. (1984) ‘Political Language’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 345–365.
Reicher, S. and Hopkins, N. (1996) ‘Self-Category Constructions in Political Rhetoric: An Analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s Speeches Concerning the British Miners’ Strike (1984–5)’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353–371.
Rosaldo, M. (1982) ‘The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy’, Language in Society, 11(2), 203–237.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1997) ‘Policy: A New Field of Anthropology’, in C. Shore and S. Wright (eds), Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power (New York: Routledge).
Skeggs, B. (2002) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Smith, K. (2012a) Fairness, Class and Belonging in Contemporary England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Smith, K. (2012b) ‘Anxieties of Englishness and Participation in Democracy’, Focaal: The Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 62, 30–41.
Smith, K. (Forthcoming) ‘Finding My Wit: Explaining Banter and Making the Effortless Appear in the Unstructured Interview’, in K. Smith, J. Staples and N. Rapport (eds), Extraordinary Encounters: Authenticity and the Interview (Oxford: Berghahn).
Strathern, M. (1988) The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Turnbull, N. (2010) ‘Legitimation in Terms of Questioning: Integrating Political Rhetoric and the Sociology of Law’, in C. Thornhill and S. Ashenden (eds), Legality and Legitimacy: Normative and Sociological Approaches, Studies on Political Sociology Series (Baden Baden: Nomos).
Werbner, P. (1997) ‘Essentialising Essentialisms, Essentialising Silence: Ambivalence and Multiplicity in the Construction of Racism and Ethnicity’, in P. Werbner and T. Modood (eds), DebatingCultural Hybridity: Multicultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism (London: Zed Books).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Katherine Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, K. (2014). Rhetoric and the Everyday — Fairness as Rhetorical Force and the Micro-Politics of Intentionality in a North Manchester Town. In: Atkins, J., Finlayson, A., Martin, J., Turnbull, N. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Rhetoric, Politics and Society Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45941-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32553-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)