Abstract
As is well known, Adam Smith spent about two years in Europe, most of it in France. It was in fact during his stay in Toulouse that he began to work on what became The Wealth of Nations (WN);1 but what proved decisive for the deepening of his understanding of market processes were his encounters in Paris with Paul-Henri Thiry (Baron d’Holbach), Claude Helvetius, Jean d’Alembert, André Morellet, Jacques Necker, and especially his discussions with Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot and Franç;ois Quesnay.2 (Quesnay was universally regarded as the leader of the so-called Physiocrats, who also included Pierre-Paul Le Mercier de la Rivière, Pierre Samuel du Pont de Nemours, and Turgot — but the latter did not rigidly subscribe to the core dogmas of that school.) Although no one denies that Smith was profoundly influenced by these encounters, the question of precisely what debt Smith owed to these thinkers is not central to my purpose here. It is, indeed, a controversial one. Roberts (1935), for example, argued that Smith drew heavily from the writings of Pierre Le Pesant de Boisguilbert whom he would have known through later writers; Du Pont de Nemours and the Marquis de Condorcet, on the other hand, suggested that anything of value in Smith’s WN could be found in what Turgot had written (Groenewegen, 1968, p. 271). But this question is probably impossible to answer categorically, partly because Smith’s manuscript notes were destroyed after his death. To talk about an intellectual debt is to put the matter in terms that are too narrow and could be of interest only to erudite biographers.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Beer, M. (1966/[1939]) An Inquiry into Physiocracy (New York: Russell & Russell).
Brems, Hans (1978) ‘Cantillon versus Marx: The Land Theory and the Labor Theory’, History of Political Economy 10, no. 4, 669–78.
Brewer, Anthony (1987). ‘Turgot: Founder of Classical Economics’, Economica, 54, 417–28.
Brewer, Anthony (1992). Richard Cantillon: Pioneer of Economic Theory (London: Routledge).
Brewer, Anthony (2005). ‘Cantillon, Quesnay and the Tableau Economique’, Discussion Paper 05/577. Bristol: Department of Economics, University of Bristol.
Cadet, Félix (1870). Pierre de Boisguilbert, précurseur des économistes (Paris: Librairies Guillaumin; reprinted as Research and Source Work Series no. 211, New York: Burt Franklin, 1967).
Caillaud, Eugène (1908). Les idées économiques de Condorcet (reprinted as Research and Source Work Series no. 550, New York: Burt Franklin, 1970).
Campbell, R. H. and A. S. Skinner (1976). ‘General Introduction’ in Smith, Adam 1982/[1776]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vol., R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner (eds) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).
Cantillon, R. (1964/[1755]). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, transl. H. Higgs (New York: Augustus M. Kelley).
Clough, Shepard B. (1936). ‘Review of Boisguilbert: Economist of the Reign of Louis XIV by Hazel Van Dyke Roberts’, The Journal of Modern History 8, no. 2, 214–15.
Coase, Ronald (1994). Essays on Economics and Economists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot, Abbé de, (2008/[1776]). Commerce and Government Considered in their Mutual Relationships transl. S. Eltis (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).
Delatour, Albert (1886). Adam Smith: sa vie, ses travaux, ses doctrines (Paris: Librairies Guillaumin).
Destutt de Tracy, Antoine Louis Claude (1817). A Treatise on Political Economy (Georgetown: Joseph Milligan;electronic reproduction;Farmington Hills: Thomson Gale, 2005).
Dobb, Maurice (1973). Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ekelund, R. B., jr. and R. F. Hebert (1990). ‘Alternative Visions of the Entrepreneur: Cantillon, Say, Dupuit’ in D. Mogridge (ed.) Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, vol. III (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).
Faccarello, Gilbert (1998a). ‘Pierre Le Pesant de Boisguilbert (1646–1714)’ in H. D. Kurtz and N. Salvadori (eds) The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, vol. 1 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Faccarello, Gilbert (1998b). ‘Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot (1727–1781’ in H.D. Kurtz and N. Salvadori (eds) The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, vol. 2 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Faccarello, Gilbert (1999). The Foundations of Laissez-faire: The Economics of Pierre de Boisguilbert (London: Routledge).
Faccarello, Gilbert and Philippe Steiner (2008). ‘Interest, Sensationism and the Science of the Legislator: French “Philosophie Economique,” 1695–1830’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15, 1–23.
Gouverneur, Fabienne (2013). ‘Pierre Le Pesant de Boisguilbert, the Organization of Economic Space, and Prosperity’, Paper presented to the 4th National Conference of Doctoral Students, Budapest: University of Technology and Economics. http://andrassyuni.academia.edu/FabienneGouverneur
Groenewegen, Peter G. (1968). ‘Turgot and Adam Smith’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 15, 271–287.
Groenewegen, Peter G. (1971). ‘A Re-Interpretation of Turgot’s Theory of Capital and Interest’, The Economic Journal, 81, no. 322, 327–40.
Hamowy, Ronald (1987). The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press).
Heertje, Arnold (2005). ‘Economics, Technical Change, the Firm and Entrepreneurs: An Overview from Cantillon to Schumpeter’ in Marco Guidi and Daniela Parisi (eds), The Changing Firm: Contributions from the History of Economic Thought (Milan: Franco Angeli).
Henry, John F. (2000). ‘Adam Smith and the Theory of Value: Chapter Six Reconsidered’, History of Economics Review, 31, 1–13.
Hutchison, Terrence (1988). Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Klein, Daniel (1985). ‘Deductive Economic Methodology in the French Enlightenment: Condillac and Destutt de Tracy’, History of Political Economy, 17, 51–71.
Lebeau, Auguste (1903). Condillac économiste (Paris: Guillaumin & cie.; reprinted by Lexox Hill Publ. [Burt Franklin], New York, 1970).
Macleod, Henry Dunning (1896). History of Economics (London: Bliss, Sands & Co.).
McDonald, Stephen L. (1954). ‘Boisguilbert: A Neglected Precursor of Aggregate Demand Theorists’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 401–14.
Mernudo, Jose and Jose O’Kean (2006). ‘The French Tradition: An Alternative Theoretical Framework’, Working Papers 06.24, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
Moriarty, Michael (2006). Fallen Nature, Fallen Selves: Early Modern French Thought II (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Opie, Redvers (1938). ‘Review of Boisguilbert: Economist of the Reign of Louis XIV by Hazel Van Dyke Roberts’, Journal of Political Economy, 46, no. 4, 592–5.
Paganelli, Maria (2008). ‘The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments’, History of Political Economy, 40, 365–82.
Peach, Terry (2009). ‘Adam Smith and the Labor Theory of (Real) Value: A Reconsideration’, History of Political Economy, 41, 383–406.
Roberts, Hazel Van Dyke (1935). Boisguilbert: Economist of the Reign of Louis XIV (New York: Columbia University Press).
Roberts, Hazel Van Dyke (1956). ‘Boisguilbert: A Neglected Precursor of Aggregate Demand Theorists: Comments’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 165–6.
Rothbard, Murray (1995). Economic Thought Before Adam Smith. 2 vols (Brookfield: Edward Elgar).
Rothschild, Emma (2001). Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Say, Jean-Baptiste (1880/1821]) A Treatise on Political Economy or the Production, Distribution and Consumption of Wealth, transl. C. R. Prinsep (Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen & Haffelfinger; Reprints of Economic Classics, New York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1970).
Schumpeter, Joseph (1954). History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press).
Skinner, Andrew S. (2003). ‘Adam Smith (1723–1790): Theories of Political Economy’ in W. J. Samuels, and J. B. Davis (eds), A Companion to the History of Economic Thought (Oxford: Blackwell).
Smith, Adam (1982/[1776]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vol., R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (eds) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques (1793/[1774]). Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth, unknown transl. (London: E. Spragg). http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/trgRfl1.html.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, Sigmund (2013). ‘The Adam Smith Problem Revisited: A Methodological Resolution’, Journal des économistes et de études humaines, 19, 1, 63–99.
Weber, Dominique (2007). ‘Le “commerce d’amour propre” selon Pierre Nicole’, Astérion, 5, 169–195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Laurent Dobuzinskis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dobuzinskis, L. (2014). Adam Smith and French Political Economy: Parallels and Differences. In: Hardwick, D.F., Marsh, L. (eds) Propriety and Prosperity. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321053_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321053_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45778-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32105-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)