Abstract
How do we sociologists understand our own history? This is not an easy question to answer. If we adopt a version of an ‘insider’ view of our development, in which we trace our forebears, our pioneering models, and our intellectual inspirations as a series of steps to where we are now, then how do we square this with the now familiar critique from Foucauldian scholars and sociologists of science who insist on understanding knowledge in its wider epistemic context? As Walter Benjamin (1973, p. 255) so subtly reminds us, ‘as flowers turn toward the sun, by dint of a secret heliotropism the past strives to turn toward that sun which is rising in the sky of history’. How do we both welcome these sociological flowers opening up to our sun, yet also do justice to those which remain out of today’s warmth and remain closed from our sight? And how do we sociologists, who are used to choosing our own research methods in the light of our current research questions deal with the ‘relics’ of our own past studies. John Goldthorpe (1991), famously, has insisted that sociologists should leave such archival relics to historians who are better skilled to deal with archival sources, and we should instead focus on what we do best. But can we rely on historians to properly render our own archival sources? And should we just focus on contemporary research apparently heedless of our past mistakes?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Abbott, A. (2002) Discipline and Department. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, P. (1968) ‘Origins of the Present Crisis’, New Left Review: 26–53.
Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2010) ‘The Sociological Imagination as Popular Culture’, in J. Burnett, S. Jeffers and G. Thomas (eds), New Social Connections: Sociology’s Subjects and Objects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 233–52.
Bishop, E. (2007) ‘A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/ Secondary Dualism’, Sociological Research Online 12(3): 2.
Burawoy, M. (2005) ‘For Public Sociology’, American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28.
Calhoun, C. (ed.) (2007) a History of Sociology in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Charles, N. (2012) Families, Communities and Social Change: Then and Now’, Sociological Review 60(3): 438–56.
Collini, S. (2008) Absent Minds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corti, L. and Thompson, P. (1998) ‘Are You Sitting on Your Qualitative Data? Qualidata’s Mission’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(1): 85–9.
Corti, L. and Thompson, P. (2004) ‘Secondary Analysis of Archived Data’, in C. Seale et al. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 327–43.
Crompton, R. (2008) ‘Forty Years of Sociology: Some Comments’, Sociology 42(6): 1218–27.
Davies, C.A. and Charles, N. (2002) ‘The Piano in the Parlour: Methodological Issues in the Conduct of a Restudy’, Sociological Research Online 7(2), www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/davies.html.
Dench, G.; Gavron, K. and Young, M. (2006) The New East End: Kinship, Race and Conflict. London: Profile.
Desrosieres, A. (1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Devine, F. (1992) Affluent Workers Revisited. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Dirks, N. (2003) Castes of Mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Edgerton, D. (2006) Warfare State, Britain, 1920–1970. Oxford: Clarendon.
Elliott, J. (2010) ‘Imagining a Gendered Future: Children’s Essays from the National Child Development Study in 1969’, Sociology 44(6): 1073–90.
Fuller, S. (2006) A New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage.
Fuller, S. (2007) ‘A Path Better Not to Have Taken’, Sociological Review 55: 807–15.
Goldman, L. (2002) Science, Reform, and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Social Science Association, 1857–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldthorpe, J.H. (1991) ‘The Uses of History in Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 42(2): 211–30.
Halsey, A.H. (2004) a History of Sociology in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hinton, J. (2009) Nine Wartime Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmwood, J. (2010) ‘Sociology’s Misfortune: Disciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity and the Impact of Audit Culture’, British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 639–58.
Joyce, P. (2003) The Rule of Freedom. London: Verso.
Kushner, T. (2005) We Europeans? Mass-Observation, ‘Race’ and British Identity in the Twentieth Century. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kynaston, D. (2007) Austerity Britain. London: Bloomsbury.
Lyon, D. and Crow, G. (2012) ‘The Challenges and Opportunities of Re-Studying Community on Sheppey: Young People’s Imagined Futures’, Sociological Review 60(3): 498–517.
Mann, M. (1971) Workers on the Move. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mauthner, N.S.; Parry, O. and Backett-Milburn, K. (1998) ‘The Data Are Out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data’, Sociology 32(4): 733–45.
Mauthner, N.S. and Doucet, A. (2003) ‘Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis’, Sociology 37(3): 413–31.
Mitchell, T. (2002) The Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Moretti, F. (ed.) (2006) The Novel: Vol. 2: Forms and Themes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Oakley, A. (2011) a Critical Woman: Barbara Wootton, Social Science and Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. London: Bloomsbury.
Osborne, T.; Rose, N. and Savage, M. (2008) ‘Sociology and its Inscription Devices’, introduction to centenary issue of Sociological Review 56(4) (November): 519–34.
Pahl, R. (2011) ‘Identities and Social Change in Britain since 1940: A Review’, Sociological Review 59(1): 165–76.
Pickstone, J. (2000) Ways of Knowing. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Prakash, G. (1990) Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modem India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Platt, J. (2005) a Sociological History of the British Sociological Association. London: Routledge.
Renwick, C. (2011) British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rose, N. (1999) Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.
Savage, M. (2005a) ‘Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies’, Historical Social Research/ Historische Sozialforschung 30(1): 118–39.
Savage, M. (2005b) ‘Working Class Identities in the 1960s: Revisiting the Affluent Worker Study’, Sociology 39(5): 929–46.
Savage, M. (2007) Changing Social Class Identities in Post-War Britain: Perspectives from Mass-Observation’, Sociological Research Online 12(3) (29 May).
Savage, M. (2008a) ‘Elizabeth Bott and the Formation of Modern British Sociology’, Sociological Review 56(4): 579–605.
Savage, M. (2008b) ‘Affluence and Social Change in the Making of Technocratic Middle Class Identities’, Contemporary British History 22(4): 457–76.
Savage, M. (2010a) Identities and Social Change in Britain since 1940: The Politics of Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savage, M. (2010b) ‘Unpicking Sociology’s Misfortunes’, British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 659–65.
Savage, M. (2011) ‘Using Archived Qualitative Data to Study Socio-Cultural Change’, in Jennifer Mason and Angela Dale (eds), Understanding Social Research: Thinking Creatively about Method. London: Sage.
Savage, M., and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology 41(5): 885–99.
Scott, J. and Bromley, R. (2013) Envisoning Sociology. Victor Bran ford, Patrick Geddes, and the Quest for Social Reconstruction
Scott, J. and Husbands, C.T. (2007) ‘Victor Branford and the Building of British Sociology’, Sociological Review 55(3): 460–84.
Spivak, G. (1988) ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Stacey, M.; Batstone, E.; Bell, C. and Murcott, A. (1975) Power, Persistence and Change: A Second Study of Banbury. London: Routledge.
Steinmetz, G. (ed.) (2004) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Studholme, M. (2007) ‘Patrick Geddes: Founder of Environmental Sociology’, Sociological Review 55(3): 441–59.
Studholme, M.; Scott, J. and Husbands, C.T. (2007) ‘Doppelgängers and Racists: On Inhabiting Alternative Universes’, Sociological Review 55(3): 816–22.
Thompson, M. (2008) Psychological Subjects: Identity, Health and Culture in 20th Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Todd, S. (2008) ‘Affluence, Class and Crown Street: Reinvestigating the Post-War Working Class’, Contemporary British History 22(4): 501–18.
Webber, R. (2009) ‘Response to “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology”: An Outline of the Research Potential of Administrative and Transactional Data’, Sociology 43(1): 169–78.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Mike Savage
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savage, M. (2014). The History of British Sociology from the Perspective of its Archived Qualitative Sources: Ruminations and Reflections. In: Holmwood, J., Scott, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sociology in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318862_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318862_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33548-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31886-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)