Abstract
Japan, China, Russia, and the United States, four of the most powerful nations in the world, positioned cheek by jowl in Northeast Asia with some of the world’s most extensive trade and mutually interlocking investments binding them together, have long had “complicated” political-strategic relations. They form two duos, each of which is or was formally bound by a mutual security alliance. In focus here is the Japan-US security alliance (JUSA). Though the JUSA is “the most important bilateral relationship in the world, bar none” (according to former ambassador Mike Mansfield), forming the northern tier of the pentagonal US “hub-and-spokes” Asian-Pacific alliance network, it is a bilateral alliance from which China is excluded. The JUSA has never been explicitly directed against China but against the former Soviet Union, wherein it enjoyed full Chinese support. Since the end of the Cold War eliminated the Soviet Union as a target of the alliance and both Sino-American and Sino-Japanese relations began for a number of reasons to fray, China’s view of the alliance has grown increasingly skeptical, however.
Financial support from the Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership and the Murata Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Glenn H. Snyder, “Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut,” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 44, No. 1 (Spring-Summer 1990): 103–124.
Stephen Walt, “Alliances in a Unipolar World,” World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 1 (January 2009): 86–120.
Takashi Inoguchi, “The Triangle of Japan, South Korea and the United States in Northeast Asia: A Japanese Quasi-Constructivist Perspective,” Japan Spotlight, Vol. 24, No. 5 (September–October 2005): 32–33;
Brian Frederking, “Constructing Post-Cold War Collective Security,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 3 (August 2003): 363–378.
Thomas, Wm. I. and F. Znaniecki, The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, 5 Volumes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1918–1920).
David Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007);
Zhang Jingquan, “Zhan hou Zhong Ri jie meng guan bijiao yanjiu: yi Zhong Su tong meng, Ri Mei tong meng wei li” [A comparative study of the Chinese and Japanese concepts of alliance formation, taking the Sino-Soviet and Japanese-US alliances as examples], unpublished paper, Jinan University, Changchun, China, 2010.
Hua-yu Li, Mao and the Economic Stalinization of China, 1948–1953 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006);
Thomas J. Christensen (Worse than a Monolith: Alliance Politics and Problems of Coercive Diplomacy in Asia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011)
Jian Chen, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001);
Odd Arne Westad, ed., Brothers in Arms: The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance, 1945–1963 (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998);
Lorenz M. Luthi, The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).
Yang Kueisong, “Changes in Mao Zedong’s Attitude toward the Indochina War, 1949–1973,” Cold War International History Project Working Paper No. 34 (February 2002), as quoted in Christensen, Worse than a Monolith, 157.
Marc Lanteigne, Chinese Foreign Policy (New York: Routledge, 2009), 68–69.
Gilbert Rozman, “Post-Cold War Evolution of Chinese Thinking on Regional Institutions in Northeast Asia,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 19, No. 66 (September 2010): 605–620.
Kong Fanhe and Mao Qian, “Feichuantong anquan shijiaoxia de anquan limian” [Security conceptions from a non-traditional security perspective], Taipingyang xuebao, Vol. 57, No. 12 (2005): 72–79.
Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness, Confronting the Bush Doctrine (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005), 153–180.
Iris Chang, Nanjing hao jie: bei yi wang de da tu sha [The Nanjing massacre] (Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe, 1998).
A. F. K. Organski, World Politics (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958;
Ronald L. Tammen, Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Carole Alsharabati, Brian Efird, and A. F. K. Organski, Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century (New York: Chatham House, 2000).
Lowell Dittmer, Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992).
Charles P. Kindleberger, The World in Depression, 1929–1939, revised and enlarged edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
Albert Wohlstetter, The Delicate Balance of Terror (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp, 1958), Rand report number P-1472.
Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund, kaigai keizai kyoroku binran, 1987, 251;
Rex Li, A Rising China and Security in East Asia: Identity Construction and Security Discourse (New York: Routledge, 2009), 215.
Xinbo Wu, “The End of the Silver Lining: A Chinese View of the US-Japan Alliance,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Winter 2005–2006): 119–130.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Takashi Inoguchi and G. John Ikenberry
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dittmer, L. (2013). Japan, China, Russia, and the American “Pivot”: A Triangular Analysis. In: Inoguchi, T., Ikenberry, G.J. (eds) The Troubled Triangle. Asia Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316851_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316851_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45821-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31685-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)