Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to provide a background to the debates surrounding national identity in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Since 1979, the Islamic regime has adopted a quintessentially Islamic discourse and has rejected the previously Persianist identity adhered to by the Pahlavi shahs. This chapter therefore traces the three decades of events and practices through which the Islamic regime has reshaped Iran’s national identity. The chapter focuses on two crucial factors in Iran’s identity discourse—nationalism and Islamism—and explores the ways in which this discourse has had an impact on the state’s societal security dilemma. These two ideologies have been linked by the state in an attempt to create a cohesive and theological national Iranian identity. Conflicts between the two identities, however, have had a great impact on the construction of Iran’s domestic, regional, and international policy. In studying such complexities in the interplay between identity and policy, this chapter looks at Iran’s security discourse by analyzing the regime’s political and ideological perceptions of its ethnic and religious minorities. The status of ethnic and religious minorities will be viewed in relation to the constitution and polity. This chapter explores the linkage between ethnoreligious political identity and national security as well as the impact of this relationship on the state’s territorial fragility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
H. Walipour, Goftemanhaye Amniate Melli Dar Goumhori Islami Iran (Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies, 2004), 24.
R. Cottam, “Inside Revolutionary Iran,” in Iran’s Revolution: The Search for Consensus, ed. R. K. Ramazani (Washington, DC: Indiana University Press, 1990), 3.
S. Maloney, “Identity and Change in Iran’s Foreign Policy,” in Identity and Foreign Policy in the Policy in the Middle East, ed. S. Telhami and M. Barnett (New York: Cornell University Press, 2002), 88.
E. Abrahamian, Iran between Two Revolutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 529.
Valayat Faqih, Keyhan International, April 12, 1981.
Quoted in H. Omid, Islam and the Post-Revolutionary State in Iran (London: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), 59–60.
Quoted in S. K. Farsoun and M. Mashayekhi, Iran, Political Culture in the Islamic Republic (London: Routledge, 1992), 133.
M. Tajic, Negahi Be Masaeele Amniyati Iran (Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies, 2003), 45.
D. M. Ollapally, “Foreign Policy and Identity Politics: Realist versus Culturalist Lessons,” International Studies 35, no. 3 (1998): 7.
Quoted in David Menashri, “Iran’s Regional Policy: Between Radicalism and Pragmatism,” Journal of International Affairs 60, no. 2 (2007): 154.
Quoted in D. Waxman, “The Islamic Republic of Iran: Between Revolutionary and Realpolitik,” Conflict Studies 308 (1998): 11.
Ahl al-Dhimma refers to protected people in Islamic communities; E. Sanasarian, Religious Minorities in Iran (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), xviii.
C. L. Cahen, “Dhimmi,” in Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol. 2, ed. B. Lewis, C. Pellat, and J. Schacht (Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1965), 227–301.
D. McDowall, A Modern History of the Kurds (London: I. B. Tauris, 2004), 271.
U. Furman, “Minorities in Contemporary Islamist Discourse,” Middle Eastern Studies 36, no. 4 (2000): 2–3.
A. Vali, “The Kurds and Their ‘Others’: Fragmented Identity and Fragmented Politics,” Comparative Studies of Africa, South Asia and the Middle East 18, no. 2 (1998): 91.
C. Walker, Countries at the Crossroads, A Survey of Democratic Governance (New York: Freedom House, 2005), 305.
D. F. Eickelman, The Middle East and Central Asia, an Anthropological Approach (London: Upper Saddle River, 1998), 201.
E. Abrahamian, A History of Modern Iran (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 165.
A. Eftekhari, “Geosecurity; A Normative Perspective,” Strategic Studies Quarterly 6, no. 2 (2006): 16.
A. J. Motyl, ed., Encyclopaedia of Nationalism: Leaders, Movements, and Concepts, vol. 2 (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001), 239.
L. Diamond, “Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflicts,” The Journal of Modern African Studies 25, no. 1 (1987): 121.
B. Shaffer, Iran and the Challenge of Azarbaijani Identity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002): 142–143.
M. Moaddel, Class, Politics, and Ideology in the Iranian Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 219.
Quoted in H. G. Azodanloo, “Characteristics of Ayatollah Khomeini’s Discourse and the Iran-Iraq War,” Orient 34 (1993): 408.
Jalal-din Farsi, a longtime disciple of Khomeini, was prevented from standing in the presidential election of 1980 because of his Afghani origin; E. Abrahamian, Khomeinism, Essays on the Islamic Republic (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), 15.
R. Graham, Iran: The Illusion of Power (London: Croom Helm, 1978), 191.
L. Binder, Iran, Political Development in a Changing Society (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1962), 77.
K. Yildiz and T. B. Taysi, The Kurds in Iran; the Past, Present and Future (London: Pluto Press, 2007), 31.
“Khomeini would not allow either group to go too far because ultimately the survival of the Islamic Revolution mattered most”; Hashim, Ahmed, The Crisis of the Iranian State. Domestic, Foreign and Security Policies in Post-Khomeini Iran (London: Oxford University Press, 1995), 9.
H. Rouhani, “Dar Amadi Bar Mashroueyate Wa Karamadi,” Strategic Studies Quarterly 18 (2000): 7.
A. Ehteshami, After Khomeini: The Iranian Second Republic (London: Routledge, 1995), 27.
A. Eftekhari, Dar Amadi Bar Khotote Ghermez Dar reghabathaye Siasi (Tehran: Centre of Strategic Studies, 2003), 63.
T. R. Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971), 9.
M. Khatami, Pishrafthaye Siasi, Pishrafthaye Eghtesadi wa Amniat (Tehran: Tarhe Noo, 2001), 128.
A. Zahiri, Islamic Revolution and National Identity (Qom, Iran: Zolal Kouthar, 2002), 198.
Quoted in S. Razavi and H. Alizadeh, Golbange Sar Bolandi (Tehran: Rouznamee Salam, 2001), 40.
R. Izadi, ed., H. AhmadiIran, Hovieyat, Mellieyat, Ghomieyat (Tehran: Moasaseye Tahghighat va Toseeye Uloume Insani, 2004), 412.
S. Chubin, Whither Iran? Reform, Domestic, Politics and National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 21.
S. Chubin and C. Tripp, Iran-Saudi Arabia Relations and Regional Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 5.
N. Keddie, “Iranian Women’s Status and Struggles since 1979,” Journal of International Affairs 60, no. 2 (2007): 29.
M. Boroujerdi, “Iranian Islam and the Faustian of Western Modernity,” Journal of Peace Research 34, no. 1 (1997): 4.
B. Buzan, People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 123.
S. Chubin and R. S. Litvak, “Debating Iran’s Nuclear Aspirations,” The Washington Quarterly 26, no. 4 (Autumn 2003): 99–114.
A. Saikal, “Iran’s New Strategy,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 61, no. 3 (2007), 296.
Copyright information
© 2013 Alam Saleh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saleh, A. (2013). Continuity and Change. In: Ethnic Identity and the State in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310873_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310873_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45676-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31087-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)