Skip to main content

Self-Discrepancy and Consumer Responses to Counterfeit Products

  • Chapter
Multinationals and Global Consumers

Part of the book series: The AIB Southeast Asia Series ((AIBSEAR))

  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

Counterfeiting is the production and sale of a fake product that is seemingly identical to an original brand-name product. International trade in counterfeit goods has shown a steady increase in the new millennium, totaling an estimated €475 billion a year, or nearly 8% of world trade (International Anti-counterfeiting Coalition, 2008). This increase in the buying and selling of counterfeit products continues to gain ground despite global efforts by governments, enforcement agents and intellectual property rights—holders to stop counterfeiting and piracy. The anti-counterfeiting forces seem to be fighting a losing a battle, as consumers often knowingly purchase counterfeits (Nia and Zaichkowsky, 2000). Therefore a clear and actionable understanding of the motivations underlying consumers’ purchase of counterfeits is necessary to influence counterfeit consumption behavior (Wilcox, Kim and Sen, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J. L. (1999) “The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Privacy (BASCAP) (2009) “Research report on consumer attitudes and perceptions on counterfeiting and piracy”, http://www.iccwbo.org/uploadedFiles/BASCAP/Pages/BASCAP-Consumer%20Research%20Report_Final.pdf, date accessed August 14, 2012.

  • Baumeister, R. (1998) “The self” in Handbook of Social Psychology (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (1988) “Possession and the extended self”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (1995) “Hyperreality and globalization: Culture in the age of Ronald McDonald”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8, 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrell, M., & J. Wrathall (2007) “Between Chinese culture and the rule of law”, Management Research News, 30(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. (1980) Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety (Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, P., & S. Stumpf (2011) “Consumer complicity with counterfeit products”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claiborne, C., & M. Sirgy (1990) “Self-congruity as a model of attitude formation and change: Conceptual review and guide for future research”, Developments in Marketing Science, Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, V., N. Wongtada & R. Kieschnick (1996) “Counterfeit purchase intentions — Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants”, Journal of Business Research, 35, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, S. (1989) “Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (January), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J., R. Goldsmith & L. Flynn (1999) “Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1994) “Exploring the symbolic meaning of brands”, British Journal of Management, 5(1), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1997) “Existential consumption and irrational desire”, European Journal of Marketing, 31(3), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. (1993) “Assessing self-concept discrepancy in consumer behavior: The joint effects of private self-consciousness and self-monitoring”, Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, T. (1997) “Consumption situations and the effects of brand image on consumers brand evaluation”, Psychology and Marketing, 14(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H., M. Fioravanti & R. Lazzari (1983) “Some implications of self versus ideal-self congruence on the revised adjective check list”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1214–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H., R. Lazzari & M. Fioravanti (1978) “Self versus ideal self: A comparison of five adjective check list indices”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 1085–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., & C. Shapiro (1988) “Counterfeit-product trade”, The American Economic Review, 78(1), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T., R. Bond, T. Klein & T. Strauman (1986) “Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influences affect”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M., A. Cox & K. Keeling (2000) “The impact of self-monitoring on image congruence and product/brand evaluation”, European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 641–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Anti-counterfeiting Coalition (2008) Facts on Fakes, http://counterfeiting.unicri.it/docs/The%20International%20Anti-Counterfeiting%, date accessed 14 August 2012

  • Khalil, E. (2000) “Symbolic products: Prestige, pride and identity goods”, Theory and Decision, 49(1), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambkin, M., & Y. Tyndall (2009) “Brand counterfeiting: A marketing problem that won’t go away”, Irish Marketing Review, 20(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, R., & R. Wolfe (1984) “Revision of the self-monitoring scale”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1349–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A., & L. Lau-Gesk (2007) “Blending cobrand personalities: An examination of the complex self”, Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nia, A., & J. Zaichkowsky (2000) “Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norum, P., & A. Cuno (2011) “Analysis of the demand for counterfeit goods”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onkvisit, S., & J. Shaw (1987) “Self-concept and image congruence: Some research and managerial implications”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, L., A. Wong & L. Wan (2012) “The effects of image congruence and self-monitoring on product evaluations: A comparison between genuine and counterfeit products”, Journal of Global Marketing, 25(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, M., R. Castaño & C. Quintanilla (2010) “Constructing identity through the consumption of counterfeit luxury goods”, Qualitative Market Research, 13(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phau, I., & M. Teah (2009) “Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podoshen, J., L. Li & J. Zhang (2011) “Materialism and conspicuous consumption in China: A cross-cultural examination”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(1), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Predergast, G., C. Leung & I. Phau (2002), ‘Understanding consumer demand for non-deceptive pirated brands’, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 20(7), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1979) “Self-monitoring processes”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 85–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & K. DeBono (1985) “Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 586–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1987) Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-monitoring New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & S. Gangestad (1986) “On the nature of self-monitoring; Matters of assessment, matters of validity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souiden, N., B. M’saad & F. Pons (2011) “A cross-cultural analysis of consumers” conspicuous consumption of branded fashion accessories’, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(5), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinyard, W., R. Heikki & A. Kau (1990) “The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 655–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tom, G., B. Garibaldi, Y. Zeng & J. Pilcher (1998) “Consumer demand for counterfeit goods”, Psychology and Marketing, 15(5), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H., & M. Gelfand (1998) “Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H., R. Bontempo, M. Villareal, M. Asai and N. Lucca (1988) “Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnel, G. (1984) “The Discrepancy between private and public selves: Public self-consciousness and its correlates”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(5), 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, K., H. Kim & S. Sen (2009) “Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands”, Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. (1979) The Self-Concept: Theory and Research on Selected Topics, 2nd edn Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G., & J. Hong (1991) “Self concept and advertising effectiveness: A conceptual model of congruency conspicuousness, and response mode”, Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Ling Peng, Lisa C. Wan and Patrick S. Poon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peng, L., Wan, L.C., Poon, P.S. (2013). Self-Discrepancy and Consumer Responses to Counterfeit Products. In: Chan, T.S., Cui, G. (eds) Multinationals and Global Consumers. The AIB Southeast Asia Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307293_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics