Abstract
The links between the micro and macro levels have challenged theoretical efforts in many fields, and economics is no exception. It is well known that the thought on micro-macro interactions in economic theory has followed at least two alternative paths. One of them comprises rational expectations and the construction of macroeconomic models based on adding up a certain number of identical, representative agents that uniformly maximize utility and profits. The other path is related to the evolutionary school and the concept of bounded rationality, heterogeneous agents and behaviour structured by institutions, in which the macro level evolves along with the learning process and transformation of the micro units.1 Jorge Katz has made significant contributions to this second approach, which we believe is the most useful to discuss the process of accumulation of technological capabilities in economic development.2 His works on the evolution of firms and industries under different macro conditions and institutional frameworks in Latin America allowed him to identify different patterns of micro–macro interactions (see in particular Katz, 1982, 1997 and 2001; Katz and Ablin, 1985; Cimoli and Katz, 2003). Such patterns evolved from the period of import-substituting industrialization to the “lost decade” of the 1980s, the pro-market reforms of the 1990s and the bonanza in commodity exports that began in 2004.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Araujo, A. and G.T. Lima (2007), “A Structural Economic Dynamics Approach to Balance-of-Payments-Constrained Growth”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), 755–774.
Bell, M. and K. Pavitt (1993), “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries”. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(1), 157–210.
Bresser-Pereira, L.C. (2008), “Dutch Disease and Its Neutralization: A Ricardian Approach”. Brazilian Journal ofPolitical Economy, 28(1), January, 47–71.
Cimoli, M. and G. Dosi (1995), “Technological Paradigms, Patterns of Learning and Development: An Introductory Roadmap”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5(3), 243–268.
Cimoli, M. and J. Katz (2003), “Structural Reforms, Technological Gaps and Economic Development: A Latin American Perspective”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), April, 387–411.
Cimoli, M. and G. Porcile (2010), “Specialization, Wage Bargaining and Technology in a Multigoods Growth Model”, Metroeconomica, 61(1), 219–238.
Cimoli, M. and G. Porcile (2011), “Learning, Technological Capabilities and Structural Dynamics”, in J.A. Ocampo and J. Ros (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics, 546–568. Oxford University Press).
Dosi, G., K. Pavitt, and L. Soete (1990), The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Freeman, C. (1994a), “The Economics of Technical Change: A Critical Survey”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 1–50.
Freeman, C. (1994b), “Technological revolutions and Catching-up: ICT and the NICs”, in J. Fagerberg, N. von Tunzelman, and B. Verspagen (eds), The Dynamics of Technology, Trade and Growth, 198–222. London: Edward Elgar.
Frenkel, R. (2004), “From the Boom in Capital Inflows to Financial Traps”. ECLAC Research project on Management of Volatility, Financial Globalization and Growth in EEs, supported by the Ford Foundation, to be published in IPD Capital Account Liberalization volume.
Katz, J. (1984), “Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage”. Journal of Development Economics, 16, 13–38.
Katz, J. (ed.) (1987), Technology Generation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Katz, J. (1997), “Structural Reforms, the Sources and Nature of Technical Change and the Functioning of the National Systems of Innovation: The Case of Latin America”. Paper presented at the STEPI International Symposium on Innovation and Competitiveness in NIEs’ Seoul, Korea, May.
Katz, J. (2000), “Pasado y presente del comportamiento tecnológico de América Latina”. ECLAC, Serie Desarrollo Productivo, No. 75, March.
Katz, J. (2008), “Una nueva visita a la teoría del desarrollo económico”. ECLAC, colección Documentos de Proyecto, LC/W.167, LC/BUE/W.21.
Katz, J. and E. Ablin (1985), “De la industria incipiente a la exportación de tecnología: la experiencia Argentina en la venta internacional de plantas industriales obras de ingeniería (1973–1977)”, in Internationalizatión de empresas y tecnología de origen argentino. Buenos Aires: CEPAL/EUDEBA.
Katz, J., M. Lizuka, and S. Muñoz (2011), “Creciendo con base en los recursos naturals, “tragedias de los comunes” y el futuro de la industria salmonera chilena”. ECLAC, Serie Desarrollo Productivo 191, April.
McCombie, J. and P.A. Thirlwall (1994), Growth and the Balance-of-Payments Constraint. London: Macmillan.
Metcalfe, J.S. (2001), “Institutions and Progress”. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), September, 561–586.
Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993), National Systems of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ocampo, J.A., C. Rada and L. Taylor (2009), Growth and Policy in Developing Countries: A Structuralist Approach. Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press.
Pavitt, K. (1984), “Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”. Research Policy, 13, 343–375.
Peneder, M. (2002), “Tracing Empirical Trails of Schumpeterian Development”. Papers on Economics and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Research in Economic Systems.
Peres, W. (2009), “The (slow) Return of Industrial Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean”, in M. Cimoli, G. Dosi and J.E. Stiglitz (eds), The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation: The Past and Future of Policies for Industrial Development. Oxford University Press, 175–202.
Prebisch, R. (1950), The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.
Rodriguez, O. (1980), La teoría del subdesarrollo de CEPAL. México: Siglo XXI.
Thirwall, A. (1979), “The Balance of Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rates Differences”. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 32(128), 45–53.
Thirwall, A. (2011), “Balance of Payments Constrained Growth Models: History and Overview”. University of Kent, School of Economics Discussion Paper 1111, May.
Verspagen, B. (1990), “Localised Technological Change, Factor Substitution and the Productivity Slowdown”, in C. Freeman and L. Soete (eds), New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change, 193–212. London: Pinter.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Mario Cimoli and Gabriel Porcile
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cimoli, M., Porcile, G. (2013). Micro-Macro Interactions in Technological Learning and Growth. In: Dutrénit, G., Lee, K., Nelson, R., Vera-Cruz, A.O., Soete, L. (eds) Learning, Capability Building and Innovation for Development. EADI Global Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137306937_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137306937_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45527-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30693-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)