Abstract
The expression “communications gap” is, as noted in the Introduction, a loaded term that implicitly attributes to a mediation problem the distance between EU institutions and their citizens. In order to consider the “communication deficit” as one of the potential explanations and not the only explanation for the lack of popular engagement with EU politics, I derive from the literature on political publicity two concepts — “domesticisation” and “politicisation” — that account, without implying any media-related judgement, for the sociopsychological remoteness of the EU and the prominence of bureaucracy and administration over ideological conflict.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Lippmann’s Public Opinion (2003 [1922])
Ortega y Gasset’s Revolt of the Masses (2009 [1931])
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, tellingly entitled Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Time (1952)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Francisco Seoane Pérez
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pérez, F.S. (2013). The True Deficits of the European Public Sphere: Domesticisation and Politicisation. In: Political Communication in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305138_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305138_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45472-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30513-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)