Abstract
As Norwegian companies internationalize by establishing major business units in a variety of locations such as North America they have to confront different local human resource management (HRM) policies and practices. These differences are not arbitrary but products of different industrial relations regimes. Using a comparative data set the initial purpose of this chapter is to assess the ‘distance’ between the Norwegian and the North American HRM regimes in terms of ‘calculative’ and ‘collaborative’ HRM practices (Gooderham, Nordhaug & Ringdal, 1999). In line with measures of institutional and cultural distance our findings indicate substantial differences. Thereafter we employ interview data to investigate how these differences have an impact on the selection of HRM practices in the North American operations of a Norwegian multinational enterprise (MNE). In particular we investigate the degree to which the Norwegian MNE ‘exports’ Norwegian HRM practices and the degree to which it succumbs to local pressures to adapt to the North American context. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for the HRM strategies of Norwegian companies in the North American setting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Quinn Mills, D. & Walton, R. 1985. Human Resource Management: A General Manager’s Perspective. New York: Free Press.
Bjorkman, I., Fey, C.F. & Park, H.J. 2007. ‘Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study’. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 430–46.
Botero, J. Djankov, S. La Porta, R. Lopez-de-Silanes, S. & Shleifer, A. 2004. ‘The regulation of labor’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 1339–82.
Dølvik, J.E. & Stokke, T.A. 1998. ‘Norway: The revival of centralized concentration’. In A. Ferner and R. Hyman (eds), Changing Industrial Relations in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell, 118–45.
Fombrun, G.R., Tichy, N.M. & Devanna, M.A. 1984. Strategic Human Resource Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gooderham, P.N. 2007. ‘Enhancing knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: A dynamic capabilities driven model’. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5: 34–43.
Gooderham, P.N., Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K. 1999. ‘Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 507–31.
Gooderham P.N., Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K. 2006. ‘National embeddedness and HRM in US subsidiaries in Europe’. Human Relations, 59: 1491–513.
Gooderham, P.N., Parry, E. & Ringdal, K. 2008. ‘The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (11): 2041–56.
Hall, P.A. & Gingerich, D.W. 2004. ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy’. MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/5. Berlin: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W. & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, Leadership and Organizations; The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lervik, J.E. 2005. ‘Managing matters—Transfer of organizational practices in MNC subsidiaries’. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Oslo: Norwegian School of Management.
Lunnan, R., Lervik, J., Traavik, L.M., Nilsen, S.M., Amdam, R.P. & Hennestad, B.W. 2005. ‘Global transfer of management practices across nations and MNC subcultures’. Academy of Management Executive, 19 (5): 77–80.
Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch C., Penttinen, H. & Tahvanainen, M. 2004. ‘Interviewing in the multinational corporation: Challenges of the organizational context’. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Poutsma, E., Lightart, P.E.M. & Veersma, U. 2006. ‘The diffusion of calculative and collaborative HRM practices in European firms’. Industrial Relations, 45: 513–46.
Rizov, M. & Croucher, R. 2009. ‘Human resource management and performance in European firms’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 253–72.
Sparrow, P. & Hiltrop, M. 1994. European Human Resource Management in Transition. London: Prentice Hall.
Weber, R.P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Paul Gooderham, Birgitte Grøgaard and Odd Nordhaug
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gooderham, P., Grøgaard, B., Nordhaug, O. (2013). Divergent Norwegian and North American HRM Regimes: Implications for Norwegian MNEs. In: Parry, E., Stavrou, E., Lazarova, M. (eds) Global Trends in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304438_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304438_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34661-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30443-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)