Skip to main content

Redefining Agency: Indeterminacy and the Role of Extra-Organizational Dynamics in Organizational Routines and Technologies

  • Chapter
Materiality and Space

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between technologies and organizing has been one of the main concerns of the disciplines of information systems (IS) and organization studies.1 Recent research has found it useful to theorize on the concepts of human and material agencies to address the processes of social and material interweaving constituting technology-organization relations (Hutchby, 2001; Rose & Jones, 2005; Zamutto et al., 2007; Leonardi & Barley, 2008; Orlikowski & Scott, 2008; Leonardi, 2011). Such conceptualizations have the potential to provide valuable insights into the nature and processes constituting everyday working practices and their change (Orlikowski & Scott, 2008); allow an understanding of how and why organizational technologies and routines change over time to produce infrastructures that enable work to be done (Leonardi & Barley, 2008; Leonardi, 2011); and provide a better understanding of how humans and technologies interact and change, from unexpected ways that technologies are used in organizational practices (Schultze & Boland, 2000; Boudreau & Robey, 2005) to workaround changes in the material structure of technology realized by its users (Majchrzak et al., 2000; Orlikowski, 2000; Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Leonardi & Barley, 2008). However, despite these valuable insights, research on agency has several important gaps, such as a lack of consistency in the nature of human and material agencies, and neglecting the embeddedness of the agencies into broader extra-organizational contexts and infrastructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M. & D. E. Leidner (2001) ‘Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues’, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2002) Information systems and global diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2003) The Link between ICT and Economic Growth in the Discourse of Development, Paper presented at the 7th International Conference of IFIP WG 5.0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2008) ‘Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review’, Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003) ‘Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter’, Signs, 28, 801–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the university halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, M.C. & D. Robey (2005) ‘Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective’, Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braa, J., O. Hanseth, A. Heywood, W. Mohammed & V. Shaw (2007) ‘Developing health information systems in developing countries — the flexible standards strategy’, MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa, J., E. Monteiro & S. Sahay (2004) ‘Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries’, MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986) Some Elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?, J. Law (ed.). London, Routledge: 196–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1987) Society in the making; the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis: the Social construction of technological systems, new directions in the sociology and history of technology, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes & T. Pinch (eds). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae, B. & M.S. Pool (2005) ‘The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems’, European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C. (1996) ‘The platform organization: recombining strategies, structures, and surprises’, Organization Science 7(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., K. Braa, A. Cordella, B. Dahlbom, A. Failla & O. Hanseth (2000) From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (ed.) (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structure, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. & A.L. Strauss (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: AldineTransaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature, London, Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1992) The promises of monsters-a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others, in Cultural studies now and in the future, P. Treicher, C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (eds). New York, Routledge: 295–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. & A.V. Ospina (eds) (2012) ICTs, climate change and development: case evidence, Manchester, Centre for Development Informatics, eScholar ID: 176883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I. (2001) ‘Technologies, texts and affordances’, Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannacci, F. (2010) ‘When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures’, European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irni, S. (2010) ‘Indeterminate matter’, NORA — Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18(1), 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. (1995) Theories as Heuristic tools in qualitative research, in Openness in research: the tension between self and other, I. Maso, P.A. Atkinson, S. Delamont & J.C. Verhoeven (eds), Assen, van Gorcum: 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999) ‘Strategies for theorizing from process data’, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (2007) ‘Process thinking in strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996) Aramis or the love of technology, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M. (2011) ‘When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies’, MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M. & S.R. Barley (2008). ‘Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing’, Information and Organization, 18, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A. R.E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King & S. Ba (2000) ‘Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team’, MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. & A.M. Huberman (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. & D. Avison (2002) Introduction: qualitative research in information systems: a reader. M. Myers & D. Avison (eds), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. & Y. Zhao (2008) ‘The Process of ERP implementation and BPR: a tale from two Chinese SMEs’, Information Systems Journal, 18(4), 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (2000) ‘Using technology and constituting structures; a practice lens for studying technology in organizations’, Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (1992) ‘The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations’, Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. & S.R. Barley (2001) ‘Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?’, MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. & S.V. Scott (2008) ‘Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization’, The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1955) Philosophical writings of Peirce (selected and edited by J. Buchler). New York, Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.M. (1990) ‘Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice’, Organization science, 1(3) 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago, University Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. & P. Guzik (eds) (2008) The mangle in practice: science, society, and becoming. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. & E. H. Kramer (2006) ‘Abduction as the type of Inference that characterizes the development of a grounded theory’, Qualitative Research, 6(4), 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. & M. Jones (2005) ‘The double dance of agency: a socio-theoretic account of how machines and humans interact’, Systems, Signs and Actions, 1(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J., M. Jones & D. Truex (2005) ‘Socio-theoretic accounts of IS: the problem of agency’, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U. & R.J. Boland (2000) ‘Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. & K. Ruhleder (1996) ‘Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces’, Information Systems Research, 1, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. & M.S. Poole (1995) ‘Explaining development and change in organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995) ‘Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method’, European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (2009) Case study research: design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamutto, R.G., M.L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D.J. Dougherty & S. Faraj (2007) ‘Information technology and the changing fabric of organization’, Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorina, A. (2012) ‘Technology and Infrastructure Co-creation from the Bottom-up: Institutional, Sociomaterial, Improvisational and Symbolic Accounts from the Field’. Doctoral dissertation, Paris, ESSEC Business School.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Aljona Zorina and David Avison

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zorina, A., Avison, D. (2013). Redefining Agency: Indeterminacy and the Role of Extra-Organizational Dynamics in Organizational Routines and Technologies. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N. (eds) Materiality and Space. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics