Abstract
In the fall of 2010 a public debate arose on Bosnian war victims’ spokespersons.1 It was sparked by what some remember as the ‘Angelina case’. Hollywood actress and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Ambassador Angelina Jolie was about to shoot her first movie on the Bosnian war. The press caught wind of the fact that it would be a wartime love story between a Bosnian Muslim woman detained in a rape camp and one of the Serb camp guards. Soon enough, the spokesperson of an association of women victims of wartime rape, Bakira Hase?cić, expressed her outrage with the idea that Angelina Jolie might portray ‘a victim in a rape camp falling in love with her rapist. That’s not only impossible,’ she said, ‘but the idea is insulting’ (Meikle, 2010). She subsequently tried and succeeded in having the film permit withdrawn. In some of the independent Sarajevo media, this move stirred up strong criticism against Bakira Hase?cić. A journalist from Sarajevo weekly Dani harshly criticized the association leader on three main grounds: first, according to her, Bakira Hase?cić had turned her activism as a victim into a professional ‘business’; second, she was exploiting the victims for her own interest and for political manipulation; and third, she was claiming an exclusive right over the interpretation of the victims’ memories of war rape.2
Varieties of both constructionists and deconstructionists emphasize that the past is produced in the present and is thus malleable. (…) Within presentism, however, it is possible to emphasize either instrumental or meaning dimensions of memory: the former see memory entrepreneurship as a manipulation of the past for particular purposes where the latter see selective memory as an inevitable consequence of the fact that we interpret the world – including the past – on the basis of our own experience and within cultural frameworks.
(Olick and Robbins, 1998, p. 128)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Benbassa (2008) ‘La concurrence des victimes’, in N. Bancel, P. Blanchard and S. Lemaire (eds), Culture coloniale en France. De la révolution frančaise à nos jours (Paris: CNRS Editions), pp. 585–94.
E. Benbassa (2010) ‘Préface’, in J. Michel (ed.), Gouverner les mémoires. Les politiques mémorielles en France (Paris: PUF), pp. IX–XV.
P. Blanchard and I. Veyrat-Masson (eds) (2010) Les guerres de mémoires. La France et son histoire. Enjeux politiques, controverses historiques, stratégies médiatiques (Paris: La Découverte).
J.-M. Chaumont (2002) La concurrence des victimes. Génocide, identité, reconnaissance, 2nd edn (Paris: La Découverte).
I. Delpla (2007) ‘In the midst of injustice: the ICTY in the perspective of some victims associations’, in X. Bougarel, E. Helms and G. Duijzings (eds), The New Bosnian Mosaic. Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 211–34.
G. Erner (2006) La société des victimes (Paris: La Découverte).
N. Fraser (2004) ‘Justice sociale, redistribution et reconnaissance’, Revue du MAUSS semestrielle, 23: 152–64.
S. Gensburger (2002) ‘Les figures du Juste et du résistant et l’évolution de la mémoire historique frančaise de l’occupation’, Revue frančaise de science politique, 52(2–3): 291–322.
S. Gensburger (2010) Les Justes de France: Politiques publiques de la mémoire (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po).
S. Gensburger and M.-C. Lavabre (2005) ‘Entre “devoir de mémoire” et “abus de mémoire”: la sociologie de la mémoire comme tierce position’, in B. Müller (ed.), L’histoire entre mémoire et épistémologie. Autour de Paul Ricoeur (Lausanne: Payot), pp. 75–96.
E. Helms (2010) ‘Justice et genre. Mobiliser les survivantes de guerre bosniaques’, in I. Delpla and M. Bessone (eds), Peines de guerre. La justice pénale internationale et l’ex-Yougoslavie (Paris: EHESS), pp. 249–65.
M.-C. Lavabre and D. Tartakowsky (2006) ‘Acteurs nationaux du politique: Introduction’, in C. Andrieu, M.-C. Lavabre and D. Tartakowsky (eds), Politiques du passé. Les usages politiques du passé dans la France contemporaine (Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence), pp. 185–97.
S. Lefranc, L. Mathieu and J. Siméant (2008), ‘Les victimes écrivent leur histoire: introduction’, Raisons politiques, 30(2): 5–19.
D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (1996), ‘Opportunities, mobilizing structures and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements’, in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–20.
J. Meikle (2010) ‘Bosnian government denies Jolie permission to film in country’, The Guardian, 25 October.
L. Nettelfield (2010) Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague’s Tribunal Impact in a Postwar State (New York: Cambridge University Press).
J. Olick and J. Robbins (1998) ‘Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 105–40.
M. Pollak (1993) Une identité blessée. Etudes de sociologie et d’histoire (Paris: Métailié).
M. Pollak (2000) L’expérience concentrationnaire. Essai sur le maintien de l’identité sociale (Paris: Métailié).
P. Ricoeur (2000) La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli (Paris: Seuil).
B. Stora (2008) La guerre des mémoires. La France face à son passé colonial, 2nd edn (La Tour d’Aigues: Editions de l’Aube).
S. Wagner (2008) To Know Where He Lies: DNA Technology and the Search for Srebrenica’s Missing (Berkeley: University of California Press).
R. Wagner-Pacifici and B. Schwartz (1991) ‘The Vietnam veterans memorial: commemorating a difficult past’, American Journal of Sociology, 97(2): 376–420.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Cécile Jouhanneau
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jouhanneau, C. (2013). Would-be Guardians of Memory: An Association of Camp Inmates of the 1992–95 Bosnian War under Ethnographic Scrutiny. In: Mink, G., Neumayer, L. (eds) History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302052_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302052_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34638-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30205-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)