Skip to main content

From Mediation to Mediatization: The Institutionalization of New Media

  • Chapter
Mediatized Worlds

Abstract

Within both scholarly research and wider public debate, profound influence on contemporary cultural and social affairs — positively and negatively — is attributed to new media, such as the internet and mobile phones. New media are regarded as either revolutionizing or significantly transforming culture and society, at both the level of global political power and the level of intimate human relationships. At the macro level of social affairs, Castells (2009) suggests that the internet allows a historically new form of ‘mass selfcommunication’ that may reconfigure the distribution and exercise of power in the network society. At the micro level of social affairs, Turkle (2011) provides a very critical view of new media and emphasizes that social relationships suffer in an online world: ‘The ties we form through the internet are not, in the end, the ties that bind. But they are the ties that preoccupy […] We defend connectivity as a way to be close, even as we effectively hide from each other’ (pp. 280–1). New media are also transforming older forms of mass communication, such as broadcasting and journalism, to the extent that we are witnessing a paradigmatic shift in mediated communication. Deuze (2007) prophesies that ‘journalism as it is, is coming to an end. The boundaries between journalism and other forms of public communication […] are vanishing, the internet makes all other types of news media rather obsolete’ (p. 141).

We shape our dwellings, and afterwards our dwellings shape us.

Winston Churchill (1944)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altheide, D. L. and Snow, R. P. (1988) ‘Toward a theory of mediation’. In: Anderson, J. A. (ed.) Communication yearbook, vol. 11, pp. 194–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asp, K. (1990) ‘Medialization, media logic and mediarchy’. In: Nordicom Review, 11(2), pp. 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009) Communication power (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2007) Media work (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemann, N. O. (2011) ‘Mediatization theory and digital media’. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 36(1), pp. 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1956) The presentation of self in everyday life (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1972) Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A. (2012) ‘Mediatization and the “moulding force” of the media’. In: Communications, 37(1), pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A. (2013) Cultures of mediatization (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008) ‘The mediatization of society, a theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change’. In: Nordicom Review, 29(2), pp. 105–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2013) The mediatization of culture and society (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. and Petersen, L. N. (2013) ‘Mediatization and cultural change’. Special issue on mediatization and cultural change. ln: Media Culture, 29(54), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1994) ‘Technological momentum’. In: Smith, M. R. and Marx, L. (eds) Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 101–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I. (2001) ‘Technologies, texts and affordances’. In: Sociology, 3S(2), pp. 441–S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I. (2003) ‘Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction: A response to Brian Rappert’. In: Sociology, 37(3), pp. SB1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. B. (2013) ‘Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization’. In: Communication Theory, 23(3), pp. 203–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2009) ‘Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change’. In: Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (New York: Peter Lang), pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. and Hepp, A. (2013) ‘A concretization of mediatization: How mediatization works and why “mediatized worlds” are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research’. In: Empedocles, 3(2), pp. 119–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. (2000) New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2009) ‘Introduction: “Mediatization” as key’. In: Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (New York: Peter Lang), pp. 1–1B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W. (1999) ‘“Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy?’ In: Political Communication, 16, pp. 247–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1906) No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1990) The design of everyday things (New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2000) ‘Shifts in newspaper advertising expenditures and their implications for the future of newspapers’. In: Journalism Studies, 9(S), pp. 704–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (2004) ‘Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept’. In: European Journal of Communication, 19(1), pp. B7–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (2007) Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008) ‘Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics’. In: International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), pp. 228–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (1995) The media and modernity: A social theory of the media (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (2000) ‘Institutional logics’. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012) The institutional logics perspective. A new approach to culture, structure, and process (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011) Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Stig Hjarvard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hjarvard, S. (2014). From Mediation to Mediatization: The Institutionalization of New Media. In: Hepp, A., Krotz, F. (eds) Mediatized Worlds. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics