Abstract
The study of community has a long and valued history across the disciplines which explore the social world and its meanings, yet dominant definitions of the term have altered with global and local transformations and the term has been used to describe a dizzying variety of social formations (Poplin, 1972). Community is constantly in transition, an extremely adaptive social force by and through which people continue to experience and in some ways shape the world around them. Yet whichever form community has taken, it has always developed as a set of practices which denote connectivity and solidarity with others. It is in community that local, traditional and natural social formations have been given precedence over rational and legalistic forms, reflecting the classical sociologist Tönnies’ (1887) famous characterisation of community as the local and non-contractual relations of Gemeinschaft existing in opposition to Gesellschaft — the larger social frameworks of nation, region and city put in place to order the social world following the ascendancy of the Enlightenment project in the West. In many ways classical sociology envisioned community as an alternative space separated from the bureaucratic and controlling forces of the state and heralding the possibility of a stateless society, a differently ordered world in which relations of trust and mutuality alone regulated social behaviours.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B.S. (1983) Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.
Castells, M. (2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crang, M. and Graham, S. (2007) ‘Sentient Cities: Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space.’ Information, Communication and Society 10(6): 789–817.
Gandy, O. (2010) Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. London: Ashgate.
Introna, L. (2005) ‘Disclosive Ethics and Information Technology.’ Disclosing Facial Recognition Systems, Ethics and Information Technology 7: 75–86.
Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. (2011) Code/Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lessig, L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
Lyon, D. (2010) ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies.’ International Political Sociology 4(4): 325–338.
Miller, D. (2011) Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity.
Mosco, V. (2004) The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robins, K. (1995) ‘Cyberspace and the World We Live in.’ Body and Society 1(3–4): 135–155.
Scott, J. (1999) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., and Chen, W 2003. ‘The Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism.’ Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 8: 3.
Wertheim, M. (1999) The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. New York: Norton.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Karen Evans
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, K. (2013). Re-Thinking Community in the Digital Age?. In: Orton-Johnson, K., Prior, N. (eds) Digital Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-22283-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29779-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)