Abstract
‘Networks’, argues Barabasi, ‘are present everywhere. All we need is an eye for them’ (Barabasi, 2003: 7). But, like beauty, the nature of a network, and what constitutes it, is in the eye of the beholder. In recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in understanding the properties and nature of networks. The authors Hardt and Negri in their analysis of the modern cultural condition have even argued that networks are a key isomorphism of the modern era. Just as, in Foucault’s terms, we can regard nineteenth-century social forms as organised around and dominated by the image of the prison, so the image of the network has come to be the key image of modern sociality. ‘Today’, they argue, ‘we see networks everywhere we look — military organizations, social movements, business formations, migration patterns, communications systems, physiological structures, linguistic relations, neural transmitters, and even personal relationships. It is not that networks were not around before or that the structure of the brain has changed. It is that the network has become a common form that tends to define our ways of understanding the world and acting in it’ (Hardt and Negri, 2004: 142).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Bolter, D. and Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. London: MIT Press.
Born, G. (2005) ‘On Musical Mediation: Ontology, Technology and Creativity.’ Twentieth-Century Music 2/1: 7–36.
DeNora, T. (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, J. (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hennion, A. (1997) ‘Baroque and Rock: Music, Mediators and Musical Taste.’ Poetics 24: 415–435.
Hennion, A. and Latour, B. (1993) ‘Objet d’art, objet de science: note sur les limites de l’anti-fétichisme.’ Sociologie de l’Art 6: 7–24.
Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press.
Kittler, F. (1999) Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Orton-Johnson, K. and Prior, N. (2011), ‘Unbinding Cybermedia: The Case of Lost,’ unpublished conference paper, BSA Annual Conference, London School of Economics, April 2011.
Ritzer, G. and Jurgenson, N. (2010) ‘Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital “Prosumer”.’ Journal of Consumer Culture 10/1: 13–36.
Thrift, N. (2005) Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage.
Virilio, P. (1997) Pure War. New York: Semiotext(e).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Allison Cavanagh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cavanagh, A. (2013). Imagining Networks: The Sociology of Connection in the Digital Age. In: Orton-Johnson, K., Prior, N. (eds) Digital Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-22283-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29779-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)