Abstract
When an individual writes about his or her life, he or she produces a narrative that offers not only an insight into broader historical processes, but also a particularly subjective interpretation of these events and their impact on the individual and the group. Among efforts to come to terms with the past, life writing offers the reader a sense of authenticity that is difficult to replicate in other genres. Where these narratives are produced by the victims of state violence, they gain the status of testimony; these individuals may be viewed as eyewitnesses (‘Zeitzeugen’), whose past suffering serves to legitimate both their memories and their right to be heard. As Christian Heuer (2010: 76) argues, particularly in the case of traumatic histories, the narration of experience in ego-documents seems to become proof of the authenticity of the biography: ‘These documents are thereby more than simply narrated life history. They appear as documents of fact.’2
This research was carried out as part of the project ‘Reconstructing the Stasi’, generously supported by The Leverhulme Trust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assmann, A. (2006) Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit: Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik (Munich: Beck).
Barthes, R. (1993) Camera Lucida, trans. R. Howard (London: Vintage). First published in French as La Chambre Claire by Editions du Seuil in 1980.
Erll, A. and A. Rigney (2009) ‘Introduction: Cultural Memory and its Dynamics’ in A. Erll and A. Rigney (eds) Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 1–11.
Erll A. (2011) Memory in Culture, trans. S. B. Young (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Fuchs, J. (2007) ‘Dann kommt die Angst’ in H. Knabe (ed.) Gefangen in Hohenschönhausen (Berlin: List), pp. 268–300.
Gallinat, A. (2006) ‘Difficult Stories: Public Discourse and Narrative Identity in Eastern Germany’, Ethnos, 71.3, 343–66.
George, H. (2007) ‘Briefe aus dem Lager’ in H. Knabe (ed.) Gefangen in Hohenschönhausen (Berlin: List), pp. 37–49.
Gewalt hinter Gittern (2010), joint initiative by Gedenkstätte Hohenschönhausen and Gedenkstätte Bautzen, supported by the Stiftung Aufarbeitung der SEDDiktatur. Project led by H. Knabe, S. Klewin and C. Liebold, and displayed at Gedenkstätte Hohenschönhausen from 16 June to 30 August.
Heuer, C. (2010) ‘“…authentischer als alle vorherigen”: Zum Umgang mit Ego-Dokumenten in der populären Geschichtskultur’ in E. U. Pirker, M. Rüdiger, C. Klein, T. Leiendecker, C. Oesterle, M. Sénécheau and M. Uike-Bormann (eds) Echte Geschichte: Authentizitätsfiktionen in populären Geschichtskulturen (Bielefeld: Transcript), pp. 75–91.
Knabe, H. (2007) ‘Einführung’ in H. Knabe (ed.) Gefangen in Hohenschönhausen (Berlin: List), pp. 7–19.
König, F. (2007) Die Gestaltung der Vergangenheit: Zeithistorische Orte und Geschichtspolitik im vereinten Deutschland (Marburg: Tectum).
Kordon, K. (2007) ‘Das Totenhaus’ in H. Knabe (ed.) Gefangen in Hohenschönhausen (Berlin: List), pp. 251–67.
Krämer, S. (1998) ‘Das Medium als Spur und als Apparat’ in S. Krämer (ed.) Medien, Computer, Realität: Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 73–94.
Müller, K. (2007) ‘Der geplante Schauprozeß’ in H. Knabe (ed.) Gefangen in Hohenschönhausen (Berlin: List), pp. 101–29.
Pirker, E. U. and M. Rüdiger (2010) ‘Authentizitätsfiktionen in populären Geschichtskulturen: Annäherungen’ in E.U. Pirker, M. Rüdiger, C. Klein, T. Leiendecker, C. Oesterle, M. Sénécheau and M. Uike-Bormann (eds) Echte Geschichte: Authentizitätsfiktionen in populären Geschichtskulturen (Bielefeld: Transcript), pp. 11–30.
C. R. Plantinga (1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
H. Welzer (2002) Das kommunikative Gedächtnis: Eine Theorie der Erinnerung (Munich: Beck).
H. Welzer (2010) ‘Re-Narrations: How Pasts Change in Conversational Remembering’, Memory Studies, 3 (5), 4–17.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2006) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit CarlWolfgang H., 18 September 2006’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2007a) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Peter W., 4 December 2007’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2007b) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Michael B., 5 December 2007’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2008a) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Bruno S., 14 May 2008’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2008b) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit KlausDieter S., 10 June 2008’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2009a) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Wolfgang W., 16 March 2009’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2009b) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Monika B., 26 May 2009’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2009c) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Hartmut S., 4 June 2009’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2009d) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Lutz L., 11 June 2009’.
Zeitzeugenarchiv Hohenschönhausen (2009e) ‘Zeitzeugeninterview mit Torsten R., 16 June 2009’.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Sara Jones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, S. (2013). Community and Genre: Autobiographical Rememberings of Stasi Oppression. In: Saunders, A., Pinfold, D. (eds) Remembering and Rethinking the GDR. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292094_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292094_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34792-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29209-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)