Abstract
In 2010, South Korea (hereafter Korea) joined the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD/DAC) as the 24th member. This represented a milestone that symbolized Korea’s entry into the ranks of advanced industrialized countries as an important donor of development assistance. Korea has since hosted two important global meetings regarding international development, the G20 Summit Meeting in 2010 and the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) in 2011.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, A., Fuzzo de Lima, A. T., and Moore, M. (2006) “Proliferation and Fragmentation: Transactions Costs and the Value of Aid,” Journal of Development Studies, 42(1): 1–21.
Ahn, E. (2010) “Korea’s Development Cooperation Experience.” Conference paper at the 5th JPI-FNF Join Workshop (Jeju: October 18–20, 2010).
Ashoff, G. (2005) Enhancing Policy Coherence for Development: Justification, Recognition and Approaches to Achievement. Bonn: German Development Institute.
Carbone, M. (2008) “Mission Impossible: The European Union and the Policy for Development,” Journal of European Integration, 30(3): 323–342.
Di Francesco, M. (2001) “Process not Outcomes in New Public Management? ‘Policy Coherence’ in Australian Government,” The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(3): 103–116.
ECOSOC (2008) “Trends in South-South and Triangular Development Cooperation,” Background Study for the Development Cooperation Forum. New York: UN Economic and Social Council.
Fukasaku, K. and Hirata A. (1995) “The OECD and ASEAN: Changing Economic Linkages and the Challenge of Policy Coherence,” in K. Fukasaku, M. Plummer and J. Tan (eds) OECD and ASEAN Economies: The Challenge of Policy Coherence. Paris: OECD.
GDI (2002) “Improving Coherence between Development Policy and Other Policies: The Case of Germany,” GDI Briefing Paper. Bonn: German Development Institute.
IDA (2008) Aid Architecture: An Overview of the Main Trends in Official Development Assistance Flows. An Update. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group.
Joo, D. J. (2009) “The Effectiveness of Loan and Grant and Its Implication.” Unpublished memeo.
Kihara, T. (2012) “Effective Development Aid: Selectivity, Proliferation and Fragmentation, and the Growth Impact of Development Assistance,” ADBI Working Paper No. 342, Tokyo: Asia Development Bank Institute.
Kim, E. M. and Kim, J. H. (2009) Studies on the Impact of the Fragmentation of the ODA System in Korea and Its Improvement Plans. Seongnam: KOICA (in Korean).
Kim, E. M. and Kim, J. H. (2012) “South Korea’s Official Development Assistance Under Lee Myung-bak: Humanitarian or National Interest?” in B. Bahk and G. Shin (eds) South Korea and the Global Economy in Transition. Stanford: Shorenstein APARC.
Knack, S. and Rahman, A. (2004) “Donor Fragmentation and Bureaucratic Quality in Aid Recipients,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3186. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Kwon, Y., Kim, H. S. Park, B., Hwang, J. and Hong, S. (2006) Overall Strategy for Korean ODA Reform. Policy Anayses 06–03. Seoul: KIEP.
May, P., Sapotichne, J. and Workman, S. (2006) “Policy Coherence and Policy Domains,” The Policy Studies Journal, 34(3): 381–403.
MOFAT (2009) Diplomatic White Paper. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Republic of Korea.
Morss, E. (1984) “Institutional Destruction Resulting from Donor and Project Proliferation in Sub-Saharan African Countries,” World Development, 12(4): 465–470.
OECD (2007) 2006 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration, Making Aid More Effective by 2010. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2008) Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews. Paris: OECD.
ODA Watch (2010) “Comments on Reform Plan of International Development Cooperation.” Seoul: ODA Watch. (In Korean)
Office of the President (2009) “The First Report of the Presidential Council on Nation Branding.” Press Release. Seoul: Office of the President.
Office the Prime Minister (2009) “The Sixth Meeting of the Committee on International Development Cooperation (December 18, 2009).” Unpublished mimeo. Seoul: Office of the Prime Minister.
PCNB [Presidential Council on Korea’s Nation Branding] (2009) The First Progress Report. Seoul: Presidential Council on Korea’s Nation Branding.
Picciotto, R. (2004) “Policy Coherence and Development Evaluation: Concepts, Issues and Possible Approaches,” paper presented at the OECD Policy Workshop on Institutional Approaches to Policy Coherence for Development, Paris: OECD.
Picciotto, R. (2005) “The Evaluation of Policy Coherence for Development,” Evaluation, 11(3): 311–330.
Presidential Transition Committee (2008) Presidential Transition Committee White Paper. Seoul: Presidential Transition Committee.
Ross, J. D. (1990) “Aid Coordination,” Public Administration and Development, 10: 331–342.
Rowlands, D. (2008) Emerging Donors in International Development Assistance: A Synthesis Report. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Eun Mee Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, and Jae Eun Lee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, E.M., Kim, J.H., Lee, J.E. (2014). Aid Effectiveness and Fragmentation: Changes in Global Aid Architecture and South Korea as an Emerging Donor. In: Kim, E.M., Kim, P.H. (eds) The South Korean Development Experience. Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278173_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278173_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44753-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27817-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)