Abstract
This chapter focuses on the similarities between two books: Hayek’s The Sensory Order (published in 1952, but with a first draft developed in the ‘20s) and Merleau-Ponty’s The Structure of Behaviour (released in 1942). These books share an original standpoint. They criticize the assumptions of sociological holism on the basis of the idea that the mind is both an interpretative device and a self-organized system. As thinkers, Hayek and Merleau-Ponty are of ten considered quite distant from each other. However, unlike Merleau-Ponty — who died many years before him — Hayek explicitly acknowledges the existence of analogies between his conception of mind and that of the French author. In a footnote of the New Studies he underlines that his theory of the “primacy of the abstract” is “very similar” to Merleau-Ponty’s idea of “the primacy of perception” (1978, p. 38).
-
As is well known, the “chief interest behind Merleau-Ponty’s thought … was the phenomenology that emerged in Germany in the early decades of the twenty century” (Carman & Hansen 2005, p. 5). Founded by Edmund Husserl, phenomenology is a philosophical approach focusing on the nature of consciousness and notably on its intuitive and interpretative presuppositions. As Madison (1994, p. 38 ff.) remarks, in spite of the fact that Hayek cannot be considered a direct follower of Husserl, he shares, along with others members of the Austrian school, phenomenology’s dislike for scientistic objectivism. This point has been underlined by Udhen as well (2001, pp. 63, 140). Moreover, according to Udhen (pp. 114, 124), Hayek’s methodological individualism was significantly influenced by the phenomenological sociology of Alfred Schutz, a follower of both Mises and Husserl (see also Cubeddu 1997; Smith 1996).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Agonito, R. (1975), “Hayek Revisited: Mind as a Process of Classification,” Behaviorism: A Forum for Critical Discussions, Vol. 3, No. 2: 162–171.
Antiseri, D. & Pellicani, L. (1995), L’individualismo metodologico. Una polemica sul mestiere dello scienziato sociale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Antiseri, D. (1996), Metodologia delle scienze sociali e teoria della politica nella Scuola austriaca di economia in N. Abbagnano Storia della filosofla, vol IX, Milano: TEA.
Antiseri, D. (2006), Popper’s Vienna: World 3 of Vienna 1870–1930. USA: The Davies Group.
Barbaras, R. (2005), A Phenomenology of Life in Carman T & Hansen M. B. N., The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Besnier, J-M. (2005), Les théories de la connaissance. Paris : Puf.
Boettke, P. J. (1990), “Interpretative Reasoning and the Study of Social Life,” Methodus, vol. 2, No. 2: 35–45.
Boudon, R. & Bourricaud, F. (1990), A Critical Dictionary of Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butos, W. N. & Koppl, R. G. (2007), “Does the Sensory Order Have a Useful Economic Future?,” in E. Krecke and K. Krecke (Eds), Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 8. Elsevier: JAI Press, pp. 19–50.
Butos, W.N. (2010), “The Unexpected Fertility of Hayek’s cognitive Theory: an Introduction to The Social Science of Hayek’s The Sensory Order” in Butos, W.N (Ed.) Advances in Austrian Economics, vol. 13: 1–20.
Caldwell, B. (2004), “Some Reflections on F.A. Hayek’s The Sensory Order, Journal of Bioeconomics, 6: 239–254.
Caldwell, B. (2007), Hayek’s Challenge. An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Carman, T. & Hansen, M. B. N. (2005), Introduction to The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cubeddu, R. (1995), Friedrich A. Von Hayek, Quaderni del centro di Metodologia delle Scienze Sociali Luiss. Roma: Borla.
Cubeddu, R. (1997), The Critique of Max Weber in Mises’ Privatseminar, Cahiers d’épistémologie, 9703/233. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.
Di Iorio, F. (2009), “Hayek’s Connectionist Psychology as a Defense for the Sociology of Good Reasons” in M. Cherkaoui and P. Hamilton Raymond Boudon. A Life in Sociology. Essays in Honour of Raymond Boudon, 4 volumes. Oxford, Uk: The Bardwell Press.
Di Iorio, F. (2010), “The Sensory Order and the Neurophisiological Basics of Methodological Individualism” in W. N. Butos, The Social Science of Hayek’s ‘The Sensory Order’. Bingley, Uk: Emerald.
Di Nuoscio, E. (2006), Il mestiere dello scienziato sociale. Un’introduzione all’epistemologia delle scienze sociali. Napoli: Liguori
Di Nuoscio, E. (2011), Epistemologia del dialogo. Una difesa filosofica del confronto pacifico tra culture. Roma: Carrocci.
Dupuy, J-P. (2000), The Mechanization of Mind. On the Origins of Cognitive Science, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1982), The Rules of Sociological Method : and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. London: The Macmillan press.
Frantz, R. (2012). “Frederick Hayek as a (First Generation) Behavioral Economist.” In, R. Frantz and R. Leeson, Hayek and Behavioural Economics.” Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freud, S. (1949), “The Ego and the Id.” London: The Hogarth Press Ltd.
Gallagher, S. & Zahavi D. (2008), The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London: Routledge.
Gray, J. (1986), Hayek on Liberty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hayek, F. A. (1948), Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1952a), The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1952b), The Sensory Order. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Hayek, F. A. (1967), Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Rules and Order, Vol. 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1978), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Heritier, P. (1997), Ordine spontaneo ed evoluzione nel pensiero di Hayek. Napoli: Jovene.
Klüver, H (1952), Introduction to F. A. Hayek The Sensory Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leibenstein, H. (1966). “Allocative Efficiency vs. ‘X-Efficiency’,” American Economic Review, vol. 56: 392–415.
Leibenstein, H. (1976). Beyond Economic Man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Madison, G. B. (1994), Phenomenology and Economics in P. J. Boettke, The Elgar Companion to Economics: Aldershot, Uk: Edward Elgar,
Marsh, L. (2010), “Hayek: Cognitive Scientist Avant la Lettre”. Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume: 13: 115–155.
Marx, K. (1967) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, D: Reidel Publishing Company.
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1988), The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
Menger, C. (1985), Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York and London: New York University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960), Signes. Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a), The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b), Sense and Nonsense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002), Phenomenology of Perception. London & New York: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2006), The Structure of Behavior. Pittsburg, USA: Duquesne University Press.
Moran, D. (2000), Introduction to Phenomenology. London & New York: Routledge.
Nadeau, R. (1997), Hayek and the Complex Affair of the Mind, Sixty-seventh Annual Conference of the Southern Economic Association. Atlanta, Georgia, November 21–23.
Nadeau, R. (2001), “Friedrich Hayek et la théorie de l’esprit in Cometti,” Jean-Pierre & Mulligan, Kevin (eds), La philosophie autrichienne de Bolzano a Musil. Histoire et actualité. Paris: Vrin.
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nemo, P. (1988), La société de droit selon Hayek. Paris : Puf.
Peillon, V. (1994), La tradition de l’esprit. Itinéraire de Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Paris: Grasset.
Petitot, J., Varela, J. F., Pachoud, B., Roy, J-M. (1999), Beyond the Gap : An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology. In Petitot J., Varela J. F., Pachoud B., Roy J-M. (Eds), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Petitot, J. (2002), “Vers des lumières hayekiennes: de la critique du rationalisme constructiviste è un nouveau rationalisme critique.” In A. Leroux et R. Nadeau (Eds), Friedrich Hayek et la philosophie économique, Philosophie économique, Colloque de Cerisy, No. 2.
Petitot, J. (2003), “Morphodynamical enaction: the case of color,” Biological Research, A Tribute to Francisco Varela (J. Bacigalupo, A.G. Palacios eds.), 36, 1: 107–112.
Petitot, J. (2006a), Modèles formels de la “main invisible”: de Hayek à la théorie des jeux évolutionniste. In P. Nemo & J. Petitot (eds), Histoire du libéralisme en Europe, Paris: Puf.
Petitot, J. (2006b), Libéralisme et Liberté : Hayek avec Kant ou une éthique de la finitude. In P. Nemo & J. Petitot (eds), Histoire du libéralisme en Europe. Paris: Puf.
Popper, K. R. (2006), Unended Quest. London : Routledge.
Rouse, J. (2005), Merleau-Ponty’ Existential Conception of Science. In Carman T & Hansen M. B. N., The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge, Uk: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. (1982b). From substantive to procedural rationality. In H. Simon (Ed.), Models of bounded rationality. Behavioral economics and business organization (Vol. 2, pp. 424–443). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Smith, B. (1996) Austrian Philosophy: the Legacy of Franz Brentano, Chicago: Open Court.
Smith, B. (1997), “The Connectionist Mind: A Study of Hayekian Psychology” in S. F. Frowen (Ed.), Hayek Economist and Social Philosopher: A Critical Retrospect. London: McMillan.
Thompson, E., Palacios, A. & Varela F. (1992), “Ways of coloring: Comparative Color Vision as a Case Study in Cognitive Science,” Behavioral and Brain Science, 15 — 1–45.
Thompson, E. (2007), Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: MA Harvard University Press.
Udehn, L. (2001), Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London & New York: Routledge.
Varela, F. J. (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy. North-Holland, New York: Elsevier.
Varela, F. J. (1989a), Connaître les sciences cognitives. Tendances et Perspectives. Paris: Seuil.
Varela, F. J. (1989b), Autonomie et Connaissance. Essai sur le vivant. Paris : Seuil.
Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991), The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Francesco Di Iorio
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Iorio, F. (2013). Cognitive Autonomy and Epistemology of Action in Hayek’s and Merleau-Ponty’s Thought. In: Frantz, R., Leeson, R. (eds) Hayek and Behavioral Economics. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278159_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278159_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33683-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27815-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)