Skip to main content

This Space Is Occupied!: The Politics of Occupy Wall Street’s Expeditionary Architecture and De-gentrifying Urbanism

  • Chapter
Occupying Political Science

Abstract

On their first day, Occupy Wall Street (OWS) demonstrators marched past a group of individuals, dressed up and drinking champagne, gathered on the balcony of the Merchant’s Exchange building at 55 Wall Street. Footage shows the celebrants adjacent to, but securely removed from the street, mockingly toasting the protesters, photographing them, chanting “pay your share.”1 This widely disseminated video provided a convenient visualization of the Occupy Movement’s assertions: a privileged 1%, safely elevated from the tumult of the 99% struggling below, engaging in activities completely discordant with the circumstances surrounding them. But the event also illustrates how the built environment frames and mediates social interactions, how space can be inscribed with political significance and structure social interaction. Through architectural intervention—a private space elevated above the public street—antithetical activities each retained their integrity. The building operated as a “technology of separation.”2 Spatial politics underpin the Occupy Movement and have shaped its unfolding. By locating itself in an urban context contingent on a unique confluence of architectural, political, and economic factors, OWS engaged with the complex forces that produce and inscribe space, that engender, shape, and circumscribe the polis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle, trans. Ken Knabb (London: Rebel Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Judith Butler, “Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street,” eipcp., September 2011, http://eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en, accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nick Blomley, “Making Private Property: Enclosure, Common Right and the Work of Hedges,” Rural History 18, no. 1 (2007): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alex Vasudevan, Colin McFarlane, and Alex Jeffrey, “Spaces of Enclosure,” Geoforum 39 (2008): 1641–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alex Jeffrey, Colin McFarlane, and Alex Vasudevan, “Rethinking Enclosure: Space, Subjectivity and the Commons,” Antipode, Early View (November 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin, Splintering Urbanism (New York: Routledge, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. David Harvey, “The Right to the City,” New Left Review 53 (2008): 23–40, at 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aihwa Ong, Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations of Citizenship and Sovereignty (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.f. William Koch, “Claiming the Camp: Biopolitics and the Occupy Movement,” the new everyday, April 19, 2012, http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/pieces/claiming-camp-biopolitics-and-occupy-movement, accessed June 13, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. PBS, “Timeline: A Selected Wall Street Chronology,” 2010, www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/timeline/crash/,accessed May 25, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace, Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arthur Bankoff and Alyssa Loorya, “The City Hall Park Project,” Archaeology, February 12, 2007, www.archaeology.org/online/features/cityhallpark/index.html, accessed April 15, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burrows and Wallace, Gotham; 167–168, 156; Michael L. Blakey, “The New York African Burial Ground Project: Past Biases, Current Dilemmas, and Future Research Opportunities,” Historical Archaeology 38, no. 1 (2004): 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1994), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hilary Ballon, ed., The Greatest Grid: The Master Plan of Manhattan, 1811–2011 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garret Dash Nelson, Grid and Anti-Grid: A Landscape Dialectic of Socioenvironmental Ideals, May 2009, http://people.matinic.us/garrett/papers/grid-antigrid.pdf, accessed June 14, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matai Denes, “Manhattan’s Other Grid,” Büa, March 13, 2012, http://matei23.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/manhattans-other-grid/, accessed June 15, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adam Schreiber, “Spectacle and Space: A Foucaultian Reading of Delirious New York,” Theory of Architectural Form, May 19, 2003, http://wso.williams.edu/~aschreib/DNY.htm,accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York: Vintage, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. see also: Pamela Wridt, “Block Politics,” Children’s Geographies 2, no. 2 (August 2004): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Phil Patton, “200 Years on the Grid,” AIGA, March 22, 2011, www.aiga.org/200-years-on-the-grid/,accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gabrielle Esperdy, “Defying the Grid: A Retroactive Manifesto for the Culture of Decongestion,” Perspecta 30 (1999): 10–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. see also: Robert A. Caro, The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York (New York: Vintage, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity (New York: Penguin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neil Smith, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (New York: Routledge, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. William Sites, Remaking New York: Primitive Globalization and the Politics of Urban Community (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sharon Zukin, Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. David Harvey, The New Imperialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alex Vitale, City of Disorder: How the Quality of Life Campaign Transformed New York Politics (New York: NYU Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Judith A. Green, “Zero Tolerance: A Case Study of Police Policies and Practices in New York City,” Crime and Delinquency 45, no. 2 (April 1999): 171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phil Hubbard, “Revenge and Injustice in the Neoliberal City: Uncovering Masculinist Agendas,” Antipode 36, no. 4 (September 2004): 665–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Neil Smith, “Guiliani Time: The Revanchist 1990s,” Social Text no. 57 (Winter 1998): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin F. Manalansan IV, “Race, Violence, and Neoliberal Spatial Politics in the Global City,” Social Text23, nos. 3–4 (Fall—Winter 2005): 84–85

    Google Scholar 

  34. Delario Lindsey, “To Build a More ‘Perfect Discipline’: Ideologies of the Normative and the Social Control of the Criminal Innocent in the Policing of New York City,” Critical Sociology 30, no. 2 (2004): 321–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Christopher Glazek, “Raise the Crime Rate,” n+1, no. 13 (January 26, 2012), http://nplusonemag.com/raise-the-crime-rate, accessed May 11, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sharon Zukin, Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), xii

    Google Scholar 

  37. See also: Jacobs, Great American Cities; Anthony Flint, Wrestling with Moses: How Jane Jacobs Took On New York’s Master Builder and Transformed the American City (New York: Random House, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. For example, Janet Abu-Lughod, From Urban Village to East Village: The Battle for New York’s Lower East Side (Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Christopher Mele, Selling the Lower East Side: Culture, Real Estate, and Resistance in New York City (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  40. David Harvey, Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution (London: Verso, 2012), 161.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sharon Zukin, Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 125–158.

    Google Scholar 

  42. New York Department of City Planning, “Privately Owned Public Spaces: History,” www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/pops/pops—history.shtml, 2012, accessed May 9, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jerold S. Kayden, The New York City Department of City Planning & The Municipal Art Society of New York, Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience (New York: Wiley, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jerold S. Kayden, “Occupying Wall Street at the Public—Private Frontier,” The Architect’s Newspaper, October 12, 2011, www.archpaper.com/news/articles.asp?id=5691, accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. New York Department of City Planning, “Privately Owned Public Spaces: History,” www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/pops/pops—history.shtml, 2012, accessed May 9, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jerold S. Kayden, The New York City Department of City Planning & The Municipal Art Society of New York, Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience (New York: Wiley, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kayden, The New York City Department of City Planning & The Municipal Art Society of New York, Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  48. C.f. Rodolphe el-Khoury, “Polish and Deodorize: Paving the City in LateEighteenth-Century France,” Assemblage, no. 31 (December 1996): 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity, 2000), 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Writers for the 99%, Occupying Wall Street: The Inside Story of an Action that Changed America (Chicago: Haymarket Press, 2011), 10–19. Note: Originally, Zucotti Park was named “Liberty Plaza Park.”

    Google Scholar 

  51. Karrie Jacobs, “Strange Bedfellows,” Metropolis, December 2011, www.metropolismag.com/story/20111215/strange-bedfellows, accessed June 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  52. David Haack, “The New Left zombie is dead! Long live Occupy!” The Platypus Review, no. 45 (April 2012): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  53. In Matt Flegenheimer and John Eligon, “Bloomberg Says ‘Tent City’ Goes Beyond Free Speech,” The New York Times, October 17, 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/nyregion/bloomberg-says-tent-city-at-wall-street-protestexceeds-free-speech.html?_r=2&hp, accessed June 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Joe Coscarelli, “Jesse Jackson Literally Links Arms With Occupy Wall Street Protesters to Protect Medical Tent,” New York, November 18, 2011, http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/10/jesse_jackson_literally_links.html, accessed June 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gregory Cowan, “Nomadology in Architecture: Ephemerality, Movement and Collaboration,” Thesis (MArch.) for School of Architecture, Landscape Architecture & Urban Design, 2002, http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/37830, accessed June 13, 2012.

  56. Gregory Cowan, “Street Protest Architecture—Dissent Space in Australia,” Bad Subjects, no. 65, January 2004, http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/65/cowan.html, accessed June 13, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gregory Cowan, “Collapsing Australian Architecture: The Aboriginal Tent Embassy,” Journal of Australian Studies 25, no. 67 (2001): 30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bruce Missingham, “The Village of the Poor Confronts the State: A Geography of Protest in the Assembly of the Poor,” Urban Studies 39, no. 9 (2002): 1647–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lance Hosey, “Slumming in Utopia: Protest Construction and the Iconography of Urban America,” Journal of Architectural Education 53, no. 3 (February 2000): 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Christopher Robbins, “Inside Occupy Wall Street’s New 24-Hour Medical Center,” Gothamist, November 8, 2011, http://gothamist.com/2011/11/08/inside_occupy_wall_streets_new_24-h.php#photo-1, accessed June 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  61. In David Haack, “The New Left Zombie Is Dead! Long Live Occupy!” The Platypus Review no. 45 (April 2012): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tasneem Raja and Josh Harkinson, “Map: Protesters’ Long-Term Plans for Occupying Zuccotti Park,” Mother Jones, October 15, 2012, www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/zuccotti-park-map-protest-plan, accessed June 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  63. C.f. Eyal Weizman, The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza (London: Verso, 2012), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Esmé E. Deprez, Joel Stonington, and Chris Dolmetsch, “Occupy Wall Street Park Cleaning Postponed,” Bloomberg, October 14, 2011, www.bloomberg.com/news/2011–10–14/occupy-wall-street-park-cleaning-is-postponed-as-14-protesters-in-custody.html, accessed May 25, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Christopher Herring and Zoltan Gluck, “The Homeless Question,” Occupy! n+1, no. 2 (November 2011): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Eric Zerkel, “Occupy Wall Street Organizes Security Team,” Pavement Pieces, October 5, 2011, http://pavementpieces.com/occupy-wall-street-organizes-security-team/,accessed May 30, 2012. OWS eventually moved away from the language of “security” in favor of “Community Watch” and “De-escalation.”

    Google Scholar 

  67. Occupy WallSt, “Occupy Wall Street: Improving Quality of Life for the 99%,” November 4, 2011, http://occupywallst.org/article/occupy-wall-street-improving-quality-life-99/, accessed May 30, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Judith Butler, “Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street,” eipcp, September 2011, http://eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en, accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chris Hedges, “The Cancer in Occupy,” truthdig, February 6, 2012, www.truthdig.com/report/item/the—cancer—of—occupy—20120206/, accessed June 13, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hannah Arendt, On Violence (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1969), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Henri Lefebvre, Le droit à la ville (Paris: Anthopos, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mark Purcell, “Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and Its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant,” GeoJournal 58 (2002): 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. C.f. Reinhold Martin, “Occupy: What Architecture Can Do,” Places, November 7, 2011, http://places.designobserver.com/feature/occupy-what-architecture-cando/31128/, accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Manissa Maharawal, “Standing Up,” Occupy! n+1, no. 1 (October 2011), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Peter Marcuse, “The Purpose of the Occupation Movement and the Danger of Fetishizing Space,” November 15, 2012, http://pmarcuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/the-purpose-of-the-occupation-movement-and-the-danger-offetishizing-space/, accessed June 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  76. William Koch, “Claiming the Camp: Biopolitics and the Occupy Movement,” the new everyday, April 19, 2012, http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/pieces/claiming-camp-biopolitics-and-occupy-movement, accessed June 13, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Emily Welty Matthew Bolton Meghana Nayak Christopher Malone

Copyright information

© 2013 Emily Welty, Matthew Bolton, Meghana Nayak, and Christopher Malone

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolton, M., Froese, S., Jeffrey, A. (2013). This Space Is Occupied!: The Politics of Occupy Wall Street’s Expeditionary Architecture and De-gentrifying Urbanism. In: Welty, E., Bolton, M., Nayak, M., Malone, C. (eds) Occupying Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277404_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics