Skip to main content

An Experienced Teacher’s Use of the Textbook on an Academic English Course: A Case Study

  • Chapter
English Language Teaching Textbooks

Summary

Although the textbook enjoys a prominent role in many ELT classrooms, empirical research investigating textbook usage in classroom contexts is lacking. Using a repeating cycle of classroom observations and pre- and post-interviews over the course of a semester, this qualitative descriptive case study focused on the way John, an experienced teacher, used the mandated textbook, and his explanations for these behaviours as he sometimes adapted, but frequently abandoned, the book. The study was situated in a UK university, on an English course to prepare students for academic study; and although the textbook was supposed to constitute the syllabus, John enjoyed considerable freedom and autonomy in choosing what was covered in class, and how. Results revealed that John’s decisions regarding the use of the textbook were influenced by his evaluation of the quality of the textbook and its lack of alignment with his preferred pedagogical approach, but also by contextual factors, such as: John’s views on the lack of fit between the textbook material and the needs, abilities, and interests of his students; course logistics, with new students enrolling halfway through the course; and his course director’s refusal to allow him to replace the mandated textbook with an alternative title which John felt was at a more appropriate level. Our findings echo those of mainstream education research, which conclude that textbook usage patterns are context-bound and mediated, and also suggest that Eunice Hutchinson’s (1996) framework for describing the factors affecting textbook use is valid. We end the chapter by proposing various textbook consumption projects for future research of a more evaluative bent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, K.M. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. In K.M. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behm, S.L. and Lloyd, G.M. (2009). Factors influencing student teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum materials. In J.T. Remillard, B.A. Herbel-Eisenmann, and G.M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 205–222). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, A. (2011). Negotiated syllabuses: Do you want to? In j. Macalister and I.S.P. Nation (Eds.), Case studies in language curriculum design: Concepts and approaches in action around the world (pp. 166–177). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M.P. and Littlejohn, A. (2000). Classroom decision-making: Negotiation and process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J.T. Remillard, B.A. Herbel-Eisenmann, and G.M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D.F. (1991). The negotiated syllabus: What is it and how likely is it to work? Applied Linguistics, 12, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Monison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E.A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C.T., and Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P.A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammatosi, F. (in preparation). English language teachers and teaching materials: A situated study of textbook use. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E.G. (1996). What do teachers and learners actually do with textbooks? Teacher and learner use of a fisheries-based ELT textbook in the Philippines. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeau, I. and Rees, G. (2008). Elementary language leader coursebook. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manouchehri, A. and Goodman, T (1998). Mathematics cumculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, C.C. and Crespo, S.M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51, 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M. (1998). Exploring the gap between teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about ‘useful’ activities for EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J.T (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J.T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J.T. and Bryans, M.B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 352–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S. (2010a). Classroom-level cumculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S. (2010b). Classroom-level teacher professional development and satisfaction: Teachers learn in the context of classroom-level cumculum development. Professional Development in Education, 36, 597–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S., Gilmore, D., and Banks-Joseph, S. (2009). Learner-driven EFL curriculum development at the classroom level. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L.S., Moore, C., Jackson, A.Y., and Fry, P.G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., and Johnson, T.S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed cuniculum. English Education, 34, 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wette, R. (2009). Making the instructional curriculum as an interactive, contextualized process: Case studies of seven ESOL teachers. Language Teaching Research, 13, 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wette, R. (2010). Professional knowledge in action: How experienced ESOL teachers respond to feedback from learners within syllabus and contextual constraints. System, 38, 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wette, R. (2011). Meeting curriculum, learning and settlement needs: Teachers’ use of materials in courses for adult migrants. TESOL in Context, 21, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Fotini Grammatosi, Nigel Harwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grammatosi, F., Harwood, N. (2014). An Experienced Teacher’s Use of the Textbook on an Academic English Course: A Case Study. In: Harwood, N. (eds) English Language Teaching Textbooks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics