Skip to main content
  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

Music moves us, both physically and emotionally. It vibrates on the skin and the ear drum and sets off emotional resonances. Although the eyelid can close and the hand can withdraw, the body is opened and vulnerable to sound through the ear. Sound is a phenomenon that transgresses the boundary between the self and the world with ease and is intimately tied to human emotion. The subject is vulnerable to sound from without, and also hears him or herself from within. For Merleau-Ponty we are sonorous beings. Sound plays a role in that chiasmic relationship between self and self, and self and world. He writes: “[L]ike crystal, like metal, and many other substances, I am a sonorous being, but I hear my own vibration from within; as Malraux said, I hear myself with my throat.” 1 In a similar vein, Jean-Luc Nancy thinks of the body as a “resonance chamber.” 2 He compares the listening body to an instrument, a drum: “Isn’t the space of the listening body, in turn, just such a hollow column over which a skin is stretched, but also from which the opening of a mouth can resume and revive resonance.” 3 It is this self-reflexive sonority and the response of the subject through which sound passes that will set the terms for this exploration of this play. Ghost Trio is filled with resonating chambers: the chamber in which we find F, F himself, and the small cassette recorder held on his lap. All the objects, including F, emerge out of the gray background, but are gray themselves. Like sound, they do not obey the boundaries of wall, floor, body-skin, but echo each other, return and diminish in rhythmic patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingus (Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1969 ), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jean-Luc Nancy, Listening, trans. Charlotte Mandell (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007 ), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mary Bryden, “Beckett and the Sound of Silence,” in Samuel Beckett and Music, ed. Mary Bryden (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998 ), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Samuel Beckett, The Beckett Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, TheUnnamable ( London: Pan Books, 1979 ), 352.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Derval Tubridy, “‘Words pronouncing me alive’: Beckett and Incarnation,” in SBTA 9 (2000): 97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For further analysis of the presence of this radiophonic voice in Beckett’s work, see Everett Frost, “Mediating On: Beckett, Embers and Radio Theory,” in Samuel Beckett and the Arts, ed. Lois Oppenheim (New York and London: Garland, 1999 ), 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilles Deleuze, “The Exhausted,” ed. and trans. Christian Kerslake in Parallax 3 (1996), 126.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graley Herren, Samuel Beckett’s Plays on Film and Television ( Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007 ), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sergei Eisenstein, Selected Works Volume 1: Writings, 1922 –34, ed. and trans. Richard Taylor, 4 vols. (London: British Film Institute, 1988 ), 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michel Chion, Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen, ed. and trans. Claudia Gorbman ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1994 ), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Bordwell and Kristin Thomson, Film Art: An Introduction, ed. David Bordwell and Kristen Thompson (London: McGraw-Hill Hill, 2004 ), 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosette Lamonte, “Beckett’s Eh Joe: Lending an Ear to the Anima,” in Women in Beckett: Performance and Cultural Perspectives, ed. Linda Ben-Zvi (Urbana: Illinois, 1992 ), 233.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. E. Gontarski, Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985 ), 118.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (London: Penguin, 1999 ), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elaine Scarry, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985 ), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ariel Glucklich, “The Tortures of the Inquisition and the Invention of Modern Guilt,” in The Book of Touch, ed. Constance Classen (Oxford, NY: Berg, 2005 ), 127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception , trans. Colin Smyth (London: Routledge, 2002), 235; emphasis mine.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Margharita Giuletti, “Visual and Vocal Ventures in Eh Joe’s Telerhythms,” Journal of Beckett Studies 13 (2003): 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jean-Luc Nancy, Noli me Tangere: On the Raising of the Body, trans. Sarah Clift, Pascale-Anne Brault, and Michael Naas ( New York: Fordham, 2008 ), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arthur Schopenhauer, World as Will and Idea, Vol. 1, trans. R. B. Haldane and J. Kemp ( London: Trübner, 1883 ), 292.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Abrams, Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition ( London: Oxford University Press, 1971 ), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lydia Goehr, The Quest for Voice: On Music, Politics and the Limits of Philosophy ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998 ), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anna McMullan, “Versions of Embodiment/Visions of the Body in Beckett’s… but the clouds…,” SBTA 6 (1997): 360.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quoted in Alfred Einstein, Music in the Romantic Era ( London: Dent, 1941 ), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Catherine Laws, “Beethoven’s Haunting of Beckett’s Ghost Trio,” Assaph: Studies in the Theater 17–18 (2003): 202.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michael Maier “Two Versions of Nacht und Träume : What Franz Schubert Tells Us about a Favourite Song of Beckett,” SBTA 20 (2006): 98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael Maier, “Geistertrio: Beethoven’s Music in Samuel Beckett’s Ghost Trio (Part II),” SBTA 11 (2000): 315.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eric Prieto, “Caves: Technology and the Total Art Work in Reich’s The Cave and Beckett’s Ghost Trio,” Mosaic 35 (2002): 208.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reed, The Schubert Song Companion ( Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985 ), 492–493.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Royal Browne, Overtones and Undertones: Reading Film Music ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994 ), 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Christopher Janaway, Schopenhauer ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994 ), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  32. John Reed, The Schubert Song Companion ( Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985 ), 339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Trish McTighe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McTighe, T. (2013). Ear: Full of Relentless Echoes. In: The Haptic Aesthetic in Samuel Beckett’s Drama. New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275332_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics